This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/france-orders-hundreds-of-new-trains-too-big-for-platforms-9412274.html

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
French rail operator orders hundreds of new trains too big for platforms France spends $15 billion on trains that are too fat for 1,300 station platforms
(about 2 hours later)
Hundreds of new trains bought to modernise the French railways are too wide to fit in almost 1,300 platforms. The country that brought the TGV high-speed train to Europe has accidentally created another first – the TFT, or the Too Fat Train.
State-owned operator SNCF insisted only 341 of the new TER trains are affected but French weekly Le Canard enchaîné claimed the number was closer to 2,000 when it revealed the faux-par on Wednesday. More than 2,000 new regional trains ordered by the French state railways company, the SNCF, are too wide to enter the old, rural stations that they are supposed to serve. To the indignation of national and local politicians, 1,300 platforms have to be rebuilt at a cost of at least €50m.
The expensive blunder is costing £40.4 million (€50 million) to fix, as building work is carried out to chip away at platforms to give the trains room to pass through. “It’s like ordering a big, new car without checking the width of your garage,” said Emmanuel Grondein, of the SUD-Rail trade union.
The affected platforms make up 15 per cent of all stations in France and work has already started to widen platforms by the few centimetres needed. As rage and amusement competed on French social networks, the two state-owned companies involved sought to shrug off the blunder and also to turn it to their advantage.
Officials said the mistake happened when engineers relied on measurements from the French railway network RFF without realising that they only applied to newer stations. It was “perfectly normal” for 19th-century stations to be modified to take new generations of trains, said Jacques Rapoport, head of Réseau Ferré de France, the organisation that owns the French rail network. Many stations had also been rebuilt to take France’s very successful high-speed TGV trains from the early 1980s, he pointed out.
Older stations, mainly in the Rhône-Alpes and Midi-Pyrénées regions, have narrower tracks. “Admittedly”, he said, the excessive width of the new regional express trains had been “discovered a little late”. All the same, the cost of rebuilding platforms and increasing the distance between tracks would be “only” €50m, around 1 per cent of RFF’s annual budget for modernisation and repairs.
In a statement, RFF said it was normal for the infrastructure to be adapted when new equipment comes in, citing examples in 2003 and 2005. The SNCF – which runs almost all of the trains on RFF’s tracks – blamed the blunder on the decision to split the state-owned network in two in 1997. The RFF (the equivalent of Network Rail in Britain) had failed to point out that many of its older stations still had platforms incompatible with the new trains ordered from Alstom and Bombardier at a cost of €15bn.
A spokesman added: “Work on some platforms will not change the deployment of the new Régiolis et Régio2N trains, which will be on time and according to the schedule agreed by RFF, SNCF and regional councils.” As if by coincidence, a draft law is due to come before the French parliament next month to merge, or re-merge, the two state-owned bodies from next year. Both the SNCF and RFF support the plan but it faces stiff opposition from the French right.
The head of the network, Jacques Rapoport, acknowledged that the problem was discovered the “a little late”. Could the story have been leaked to the investigative weekly newspaper, Le Canard Enchainé, to help make the case?
France’s Transport Minister, Frederic Cuvillier, demanded an inquiry into the “incredible” mistake. The SNCF said that the mistake would have no effect on fares. Nor would it delay the introduction of the smart new Regiolis and Regio 2N trains. More than 300 platforms had already been cut back.
“When you separate the rail operator from the train company, this is what happens,” he added. The RFF said the cost would come from its existing budget. Since part of the cost of the network is borne by France’s regional governments, a row over who pays is nonetheless raging.
Alain Rousset, of the Association of French Regions, said: “We will refuse to pay an extra centime for these repairs. We can’t be at once the financiers of the network and lambs to be fleeced.”
Jean-Christophe Cambadélis, leader of the Socialist party, called on Mr Rapoport of the RFF and Guillaume Pépy, head of the SNCF, to resign.
Both have been called to face interrogation “as soon as possible” by the National Assembly’s environment committee. A case of two “fat controllers” who failed to spot that their trains were oversized?