This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-27537836

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Richard III court reburial bid fails Richard III reburial court bid fails
(35 minutes later)
Distant relatives of King Richard III have lost their High Court battle over where his remains should be reburied.Distant relatives of King Richard III have lost their High Court battle over where his remains should be reburied.
His remains were uncovered in a Leicester car park in September 2012 and the nearby cathedral was lined up for his tomb. His remains were found in a Leicester car park in 2012 and the city's cathedral was lined up for his tomb, but some wanted him reburied in York.
But a group claiming descent from the king's wider family were granted a judicial review, arguing more views should have been taken into account.But a group claiming descent from the king's wider family were granted a judicial review, arguing more views should have been taken into account.
Judges at the High Court said there was "no duty to consult".Judges at the High Court said there was "no duty to consult".
In the ruling, they added: "There was no public law grounds for the court to interfere."In the ruling, they added: "There was no public law grounds for the court to interfere."
'Dignity and honour'
Killed at the Battle of Bosworth in 1485, Richard III was buried in a Leicester church but the building was lost to later development.
Authorities in Leicester said they were delighted at the decision and they looked forward to reinterring the body with "dignity and honour".Authorities in Leicester said they were delighted at the decision and they looked forward to reinterring the body with "dignity and honour".
The group which brought the challenge, the Plantagenet Alliance, claimed York was a more suitable location for Richard's remains as he has spent his childhood and much of his adult life in the North.
In the court case, they had argued the unique nature of the discovery meant more consultation should have taken place.
Lady Justice Hallett, sitting with Mr Justice Ouseley and Mr Justice Haddon-Cave, ruled there were no public law grounds for interfering with the plans for reburial at Leicester Cathedral.
The three judges said in a joint ruling: "Since Richard III's exhumation on 5 September 2012, passions have been roused and much ink has been spilt.
"Issues relating to his life and death and place of reinterment have been exhaustively examined and debated.
"The Very Reverend David Monteith, the Dean of Leicester Cathedral, has explained the considerable efforts and expenditure invested by the cathedral in order to create a lasting burial place 'as befits an anointed King'.
"We agree that it is time for Richard III to be given a dignified reburial, and finally laid to rest."
The reinterment ceremony has been scheduled for spring 2015 and a new design for the tomb is expected to be revealed in "three or four weeks".