This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/science/animal-magic/2014/jun/09/fifa-brazil-failing-threatened-armadillo-conservation

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Fifa and Brazil are failing threatened armadillo, say conservationists Fifa and Brazil are failing threatened armadillo, say conservationists
(about 2 hours later)
In 2012, Fifa unveiled its mascotIn 2012, Fifa unveiled its mascot
for Brazil 2014, a colourful armadillo called Fuleco. Its real-world inspiration is thefor Brazil 2014, a colourful armadillo called Fuleco. Its real-world inspiration is the
BrazilianBrazilian
three-banded armadillo Tolypeutes tricinctus, a species that has evolvedthree-banded armadillo Tolypeutes tricinctus, a species that has evolved
the defensive trick of rolling up into a near-perfect, football-like sphere.the defensive trick of rolling up into a near-perfect, football-like sphere.
Ironically, the same property that makes it so suitable as the figurehead forIronically, the same property that makes it so suitable as the figurehead for
the World Cup also makes it easy to bag up and barbeque. The combined forces ofthe World Cup also makes it easy to bag up and barbeque. The combined forces of
illegal subsistence hunting and habitat destruction have rendered thisillegal subsistence hunting and habitat destruction have rendered this
remarkable species vulnerableremarkable species vulnerable
to extinction, according to the IUCN.to extinction, according to the IUCN.
Initially, conservationistsInitially, conservationists
were upbeat about the choice of species as mascot, hopeful that the sight of were upbeat about the choice of species as mascot, hopeful that the sight of
Fuleco bouncingFuleco bouncing
across the World Cup stage would raise awareness of the plight of the across the World Cup stage would raise awareness of the plight of the
three-bandedthree-banded
armadillo (or “tatu-bola” as it’s known locally) and the Caatinga, a dryarmadillo (or “tatu-bola” as it’s known locally) and the Caatinga, a dry
forest region in the northeast of Brazil and the main stronghold of forest region in the northeast of Brazil and the main stronghold of
thisthis
enigmatic mammal. But there is increasingenigmatic mammal. But there is increasing
concern that Fuleco isn’t working hard enough to benefit the tatu-bola orconcern that Fuleco isn’t working hard enough to benefit the tatu-bola or
its habitat.its habitat.
The World Cup will profit hugely fromThe World Cup will profit hugely from
the image of Fuleco, says Rodrigo Castro, executivethe image of Fuleco, says Rodrigo Castro, executive
secretary of the Caatinga Association, ansecretary of the Caatinga Association, an
NGO that champions the conservation of the tatu-bola and the Caatinga (which occupiesNGO that champions the conservation of the tatu-bola and the Caatinga (which occupies
over 800,000 km2 or around 10% of the country). In 2013, one of the World Cup’s officialover 800,000 km2 or around 10% of the country). In 2013, one of the World Cup’s official
sponsors Continental Tyres did make a one-off donationsponsors Continental Tyres did make a one-off donation
of 100,000 Reais to the Caatinga Association. But this is only around $45,000of 100,000 Reais to the Caatinga Association. But this is only around $45,000
(or £27,000) and was only enough to get Project(or £27,000) and was only enough to get Project
Tatu-bola rolling, says Castro, a campaign with the aim of preventing the extinction of the threatenedTatu-bola rolling, says Castro, a campaign with the aim of preventing the extinction of the threatened
armadillo in the coming decade. As things stand, Fifa itself has made no directarmadillo in the coming decade. As things stand, Fifa itself has made no direct
contribution to the Caatinga Association or the conservation of the tatu-bola, he says.contribution to the Caatinga Association or the conservation of the tatu-bola, he says.
From where I’m sitting, this does notFrom where I’m sitting, this does not
look good. In the 2012 presslook good. In the 2012 press
release that introduced Fuleco to the world, Fifa's secretary generalrelease that introduced Fuleco to the world, Fifa's secretary general
Jérôme Valcke described the choice of the three-banded armadillo as “very fitting”.Jérôme Valcke described the choice of the three-banded armadillo as “very fitting”.
“One of the key objectives through the 2014 Fifa World Cup is to use the event“One of the key objectives through the 2014 Fifa World Cup is to use the event
as a platform to communicate the importance of the environment and ecology,” heas a platform to communicate the importance of the environment and ecology,” he
said. “We are glad to be able to do so with the help of a mascot who I’m suresaid. “We are glad to be able to do so with the help of a mascot who I’m sure
will be much-loved, not only in Brazil, but all over the world.” After a publicwill be much-loved, not only in Brazil, but all over the world.” After a public
vote on names, Fulecovote on names, Fuleco
won through, a fusion of the words “Futbol” and “Ecologia”.won through, a fusion of the words “Futbol” and “Ecologia”.
But wouldn’t Fifa’s commitment to theBut wouldn’t Fifa’s commitment to the
environment and ecology be so much more credible if it channeled some of itsenvironment and ecology be so much more credible if it channeled some of its
Fuleco-related revenue into the conservation of the Caatinga? Castro agrees andFuleco-related revenue into the conservation of the Caatinga? Castro agrees and
has made several concrete proposals to Fifa. For instance, a small percentagehas made several concrete proposals to Fifa. For instance, a small percentage
of Fuleco soft toy sales (one incarnation retails at $14.99) could be directed towardsof Fuleco soft toy sales (one incarnation retails at $14.99) could be directed towards
the tatu-bola conservation project. “The 2014 World Cupthe tatu-bola conservation project. “The 2014 World Cup
could be remembered by future generations as the first event of this nature tocould be remembered by future generations as the first event of this nature to
have been crucial to save a native species of the host country fromhave been crucial to save a native species of the host country from
extinction,” he says.extinction,” he says.
In April, several senior BrazilianIn April, several senior Brazilian
scientists made another innovative proposal in the journal Biotropica (full article here, scientists made another innovative proposal in the journal Biotropica (full article here). They called on Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff to
but behind a paywall). They called on Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff to
protect 10 km2 of Caatinga forest for every goal scored during the tournament. Theprotect 10 km2 of Caatinga forest for every goal scored during the tournament. The
South Africa 2010 World Cup saw 145 balls in nets, which would translate to 145,000 km2 or around 20% of the region. South Africa 2010 World Cup saw 145 balls in nets, which would translate to 1450 km2 or around 0.2% of the region (corrected from original post, in which I got my maths muddled).
This would be extremely welcome, for lessThis would be extremely welcome, for less
than 1% of the Caatinga is currently designated as a protected area. Thisthan 1% of the Caatinga is currently designated as a protected area. This
is surprising, given that it is home to an impressive suite of species, withis surprising, given that it is home to an impressive suite of species, with
more than 1,000 vascular plants, no fewer than 180 bees, 240 fish, more than 150more than 1,000 vascular plants, no fewer than 180 bees, 240 fish, more than 150
amphibians and reptiles, over 500 birds and around 150 mammals. In comparison toamphibians and reptiles, over 500 birds and around 150 mammals. In comparison to
wetter habitats like the tropical forests along the Brazil’s Atlantic coast orwetter habitats like the tropical forests along the Brazil’s Atlantic coast or
the iconic Amazon, the Caatinga has historically received next-to-nothing.the iconic Amazon, the Caatinga has historically received next-to-nothing.
This lack of scientific and conservationThis lack of scientific and conservation
input probably explains why, just 20 years ago in 1994, the tatu-bola appearedinput probably explains why, just 20 years ago in 1994, the tatu-bola appeared
in an appendix of “extinct or probably extinct” mammal species. With nobody outin an appendix of “extinct or probably extinct” mammal species. With nobody out
there looking, there were no reliable reports that this dinky mammal was stillthere looking, there were no reliable reports that this dinky mammal was still
trotting its way through the scrub. It turns out that the armadillo stilltrotting its way through the scrub. It turns out that the armadillo still
survives but without proper funding, its future is bleak. “The World Cup and FIFA itself could play asurvives but without proper funding, its future is bleak. “The World Cup and FIFA itself could play a
major role in saving the species from extinction,” says Castro. “Unfortunatelymajor role in saving the species from extinction,” says Castro. “Unfortunately
we got no reply from FIFA on our propositions,” he says.we got no reply from FIFA on our propositions,” he says.
I telephoned Fifa this morning at their headquarters in Zurich,I telephoned Fifa this morning at their headquarters in Zurich,
Switzerland and got a recorded message. “OurSwitzerland and got a recorded message. “Our
offices remain closed on Monday 9 June due to a local holiday.” When they areoffices remain closed on Monday 9 June due to a local holiday.” When they are
back at work, they will be busy with the tournament itself. But I don’t thinkback at work, they will be busy with the tournament itself. But I don’t think
it is too late for Fifa and Brazil to seize the opportunity presented by thisit is too late for Fifa and Brazil to seize the opportunity presented by this
curious armadillo. It wouldn’t cost much to support the conservation of thecurious armadillo. It wouldn’t cost much to support the conservation of the
Caatinga (at least not in comparison with the vast wealth being generated byCaatinga (at least not in comparison with the vast wealth being generated by
the event), it would look good for Fifa (which is keen to show off its supportthe event), it would look good for Fifa (which is keen to show off its support
for the environment) and – who knows – it might even do some good.for the environment) and – who knows – it might even do some good.