This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/11/world/bowe-bergdahl-briefing-leaves-senators-with-new-doubts-on-prisoner-swap.html

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
After Bergdahl Briefing, Senators Still Doubtful on Prisoner Swap After Bergdahl Briefing, Senators Still Doubtful on Prisoner Swap
(about 4 hours later)
WASHINGTON — Senators emerged from a classified, closed-door briefing on the release of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl on Tuesday seemingly less convinced than ever about the wisdom of swapping five high-level Taliban prisoners for the Army soldier after he spent years in captivity.WASHINGTON — Senators emerged from a classified, closed-door briefing on the release of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl on Tuesday seemingly less convinced than ever about the wisdom of swapping five high-level Taliban prisoners for the Army soldier after he spent years in captivity.
At the session, senior Defense Department and military officials briefed members of the Senate Armed Services Committee, again presenting a united front in their support of the prisoner exchange, said Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, the committee’s chairman.At the session, senior Defense Department and military officials briefed members of the Senate Armed Services Committee, again presenting a united front in their support of the prisoner exchange, said Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, the committee’s chairman.
But they appeared to make little headway in defusing the festering political controversy that has again pitted the administration against Republicans — and some Democrats — who question President Obama’s judgment on national security.But they appeared to make little headway in defusing the festering political controversy that has again pitted the administration against Republicans — and some Democrats — who question President Obama’s judgment on national security.
The terms of the exchange signaled “a lack of understanding of the reality of the conflict we’re engaged in,” Senator Jeff Sessions, Republican of Alabama, said as he emerged from the secure hearing room. “It’s got to be demoralizing for our allies. It’s got to be demoralizing for our soldiers. It’s got to embolden the people we’re fighting against.The terms of the exchange signaled “a lack of understanding of the reality of the conflict we’re engaged in,” Senator Jeff Sessions, Republican of Alabama, said as he emerged from the secure hearing room. “It’s got to be demoralizing for our allies. It’s got to be demoralizing for our soldiers. It’s got to embolden the people we’re fighting against.
“We’re in a war,” he continued. “I think this White House does not understand that.”“We’re in a war,” he continued. “I think this White House does not understand that.”
Democrats either shied away from a full-throated defense or took their own shots at the terms of the trade. After the hearing, Mr. Levin offered perhaps the strongest defense yet of the prisoner exchange before congressional testimony on Wednesday by Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel.
“When the chairman of the Joint Chiefs and the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs tell me as chairman of the Armed Services Committee — and try to tell the public — that they very much supported this deal despite the fact that they knew Bergdahl had left his unit and despite the fact that they knew these five Taliban were bad guys, that has a big impact on me,” he said.
But even some fellow Democrats would not join in the defense.
“Was it a good deal or a bad deal?” said Senator Joe Manchin III, Democrat of West Virginia. “In my mind it’s still a bad deal. I still can’t explain it back home to my fellow West Virginians why these five who they’ve tried repeatedly to get some exchange for over the last 10 years, why these five all of the sudden all were released.”“Was it a good deal or a bad deal?” said Senator Joe Manchin III, Democrat of West Virginia. “In my mind it’s still a bad deal. I still can’t explain it back home to my fellow West Virginians why these five who they’ve tried repeatedly to get some exchange for over the last 10 years, why these five all of the sudden all were released.”
Lawmakers in both chambers moved toward some kind of legislative confrontation. The House Appropriations Committee voted 33 to 13 on Tuesday to bar the use of federal money to transfer detainees from the military prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Six Democrats voted yes. Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, has drafted similar legislation.Lawmakers in both chambers moved toward some kind of legislative confrontation. The House Appropriations Committee voted 33 to 13 on Tuesday to bar the use of federal money to transfer detainees from the military prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Six Democrats voted yes. Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, has drafted similar legislation.
The briefers to the Senate Armed Services Committee included Robert O. Work, the deputy defense secretary; Adm. James A. Winnefeld Jr., the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and the Joint Chiefs’ Pakistan and Afghanistan coordinator, the Pentagon’s general counsel and the assistant defense secretary for special operations.The briefers to the Senate Armed Services Committee included Robert O. Work, the deputy defense secretary; Adm. James A. Winnefeld Jr., the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and the Joint Chiefs’ Pakistan and Afghanistan coordinator, the Pentagon’s general counsel and the assistant defense secretary for special operations.
But they did not prove persuasive. Senator John McCain, the Arizona Republican who was a prisoner of war, said the administration’s rationale kept shifting. At one point, the administration used a video from early this year to show that Sergeant Bergdahl was in ill health, and it later asserted that the Taliban were threatening his life.But they did not prove persuasive. Senator John McCain, the Arizona Republican who was a prisoner of war, said the administration’s rationale kept shifting. At one point, the administration used a video from early this year to show that Sergeant Bergdahl was in ill health, and it later asserted that the Taliban were threatening his life.
“They’re not going to kill an American prisoner,” Mr. McCain said. “That’s why they keep him alive. It is of utmost value to them to keep an American prisoner alive. Look what they got for it.”“They’re not going to kill an American prisoner,” Mr. McCain said. “That’s why they keep him alive. It is of utmost value to them to keep an American prisoner alive. Look what they got for it.”
Of course, militants in Pakistan and Iraq have killed American captives, including the Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl and the American contractor Nick Berg.Of course, militants in Pakistan and Iraq have killed American captives, including the Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl and the American contractor Nick Berg.
Mr. Manchin, the West Virginia Democrat, did say that the briefers described the conditions that Sergeant Bergdahl was kept in as “pretty horrific.”Mr. Manchin, the West Virginia Democrat, did say that the briefers described the conditions that Sergeant Bergdahl was kept in as “pretty horrific.”
Mr. Levin, the Michigan Democrat, said of the attacks against Sergeant Bergdahl: “I think there’s been too much prejudgment. Before people reach any conclusion about whether he did anything improper, he’s an American soldier, and he ought to be given due process. That means we should hear from him before people jump to a conclusion.”Mr. Levin, the Michigan Democrat, said of the attacks against Sergeant Bergdahl: “I think there’s been too much prejudgment. Before people reach any conclusion about whether he did anything improper, he’s an American soldier, and he ought to be given due process. That means we should hear from him before people jump to a conclusion.”
Senator Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, the ranking Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee and a member of the Armed Services Committee, also cautioned, “There’s still an awful lot to be discovered from Bergdahl himself, as well as from other folks involved, and that’s still ongoing.”Senator Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, the ranking Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee and a member of the Armed Services Committee, also cautioned, “There’s still an awful lot to be discovered from Bergdahl himself, as well as from other folks involved, and that’s still ongoing.”
But Sergeant Bergdahl’s words may already lack currency in the heated political environment he will find in the United States. Several lawmakers said that little was said in the briefing that had not already been discussed in the news media — about Sergeant Bergdahl’s physical and mental state or the conditions of his captivity.But Sergeant Bergdahl’s words may already lack currency in the heated political environment he will find in the United States. Several lawmakers said that little was said in the briefing that had not already been discussed in the news media — about Sergeant Bergdahl’s physical and mental state or the conditions of his captivity.
But Mr. Manchin appeared to be dismissive about those reports. “All they have is what he’s been able to communicate,” he said. “They don’t have anything else except his communication. That’s it.”But Mr. Manchin appeared to be dismissive about those reports. “All they have is what he’s been able to communicate,” he said. “They don’t have anything else except his communication. That’s it.”
Nor were the Defense Department officials able to alleviate concerns about the threat posed by the five prisoners released to the government of Qatar, in the Persian Gulf. Mr. Sessions said the five had been “taken basically to a resort town” where they and their families were being supported financially for a year, after which they would be free to rejoin the fight.Nor were the Defense Department officials able to alleviate concerns about the threat posed by the five prisoners released to the government of Qatar, in the Persian Gulf. Mr. Sessions said the five had been “taken basically to a resort town” where they and their families were being supported financially for a year, after which they would be free to rejoin the fight.
“It’s already clear they’re under the most minimal of control,” he said.“It’s already clear they’re under the most minimal of control,” he said.