This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-27887639

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Google and Facebook can be legally intercepted, says UK spy boss Google and Facebook can be legally intercepted, says UK spy boss
(35 minutes later)
The UK government has revealed that intelligence service GCHQ can snoop on British citizens' use of Facebook, Twitter and Google without a warrant because the firms are based overseas.The UK government has revealed that intelligence service GCHQ can snoop on British citizens' use of Facebook, Twitter and Google without a warrant because the firms are based overseas.
UK spy boss Charles Farr said that such platforms are classified as external communications.UK spy boss Charles Farr said that such platforms are classified as external communications.
The policy was revealed as part of an ongoing legal battle with campaign group Privacy International (PI).The policy was revealed as part of an ongoing legal battle with campaign group Privacy International (PI).
PI said the interpretation of the law "patronises the British people".PI said the interpretation of the law "patronises the British people".
It is the first time that the UK has commented on how the UK's legal framework allows the mass interception of communications as outlined by US whistleblower Edward Snowden in his leaks about global government surveillance.It is the first time that the UK has commented on how the UK's legal framework allows the mass interception of communications as outlined by US whistleblower Edward Snowden in his leaks about global government surveillance.
The policy was revealed by Charles Farr, director general of the Office of Security and Counter-Terrorism. The ex-National Security Agency contractor revealed extensive details of internet and phone snooping and has since fled the US and sought temporary asylum in Russia.
According to Mr Farr, Facebook, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and web searches on Google, as well as webmail services such as Hotmail and Yahoo are classified as "external communications", which means that they can be intercepted without the need for additional legal clearance. Charles Farr, director general of the Office of Security and Counter-Terrorism told PI that Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and web searches on Google - as well as webmail services such as Hotmail and Yahoo - are classified as "external communications", which means that they can be intercepted without the need for additional legal clearance.
Under British law the internal communications between citizens can only be intercepted when a warrant is issued. Warrants can only be issued when there is suspicion of illegal activity.Under British law the internal communications between citizens can only be intercepted when a warrant is issued. Warrants can only be issued when there is suspicion of illegal activity.
Mr Farr did not reveal the extent to which GCHQ uses its power to intercept external communications.Mr Farr did not reveal the extent to which GCHQ uses its power to intercept external communications.
In a statement, GCHQ said all of its work "is carried out in accordance with a strict legal and policy framework which ensures that our activities are authorised, necessary and proportionate".In a statement, GCHQ said all of its work "is carried out in accordance with a strict legal and policy framework which ensures that our activities are authorised, necessary and proportionate".
'Byzantine' laws'Byzantine' laws
But civil liberty groups were outraged by the revelations.But civil liberty groups were outraged by the revelations.
James Welch, legal director of human rights group Liberty, said: "The security services consider that they're entitled to read, listen and analyse all our communications on Facebook, Google and other US-based platforms.James Welch, legal director of human rights group Liberty, said: "The security services consider that they're entitled to read, listen and analyse all our communications on Facebook, Google and other US-based platforms.
"If there was any remaining doubt that our snooping laws need a radical overhaul there can be no longer.""If there was any remaining doubt that our snooping laws need a radical overhaul there can be no longer."
Meanwhile Eric King, deputy director of Privacy International said the revelation showed that spy agencies operated under their own laws.Meanwhile Eric King, deputy director of Privacy International said the revelation showed that spy agencies operated under their own laws.
"Intelligence agencies cannot be considered accountable to parliament and to the public they serve when their actions are obfuscated through secret interpretations of Byzantine laws.""Intelligence agencies cannot be considered accountable to parliament and to the public they serve when their actions are obfuscated through secret interpretations of Byzantine laws."
The ongoing legal challenge, brought by PI, Amnesty, the American Civil Liberties Union and six other national civil liberties organisations, was a direct response to the revelations made by Edward Snowden about the UK's global digital surveillance. The legal challenge, brought by PI, Amnesty, the American Civil Liberties Union and six other national civil liberties organisations, was a direct response to the revelations made by Edward Snowden about the UK's global digital surveillance.