This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/jun/18/washington-redskins-lose-trademark-team-us-patent-office

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
US patent office strips Washington Redskins of 'offensive' trademark US patent office strips Washington Redskins of 'offensive' trademark
(35 minutes later)
The US Patent and Trademark Office announced on Wednesday that it is to cancel six trademark registrations belonging to the Washington Redskins, ruling that the NFL team's name is disparaging to Native Americans.The US Patent and Trademark Office announced on Wednesday that it is to cancel six trademark registrations belonging to the Washington Redskins, ruling that the NFL team's name is disparaging to Native Americans.
In a landmark decision, the offices's trademark trial and appeal board found that the name cannot be trademarked under federal law, which prohibits the protection of names that “may disparage” individuals or groups, or “bring them into contempt or disrepute”.In a landmark decision, the offices's trademark trial and appeal board found that the name cannot be trademarked under federal law, which prohibits the protection of names that “may disparage” individuals or groups, or “bring them into contempt or disrepute”.
“We decide, based on the evidence properly before us, that these registrations must be cancelled because they were disparaging to Native Americans,” the board wrote in its ruling.“We decide, based on the evidence properly before us, that these registrations must be cancelled because they were disparaging to Native Americans,” the board wrote in its ruling.
Amanda Blackhorse, one of the five petitioners, called the ruling a “great victory for Native Americans – and for all Americans”. Amanda Blackhorse, who brought the case against the team, called the ruling a "great victory for Native Americans – and for all Americans".
While the ruling does not prevent the team from continuing to use its name, Blackhorse said she hopes it will put pressure on the NFL team to change it. While the ruling does not prevent the team from continuing to use its name, Blackhorse said she hopes it will put pressure on the NFL team to change it. "I hope this ruling brings us a step closer to that inevitable day when the name of the Washington football team will be changed," she said.
“I hope this ruling brings us a step closer to that inevitable day when the name of the Washington football team will be changed,” she said. The controversy surrounding the team's name has intensified in the last year, even drawing in President Barack Obama. "If I were the owner of the team and I knew that the name of my team, even if they've had a storied history, that was offending a sizable group of people, I'd think about changing it," Obama told the Associated Press.Washington's owner, Daniel Snyder, however, has said repeatedly that he will not change the team's name. In May, the Washington's president, Bruce Allen, said the name was "respectful" to Native Americans, in a letter to Senate majority leader Harry Reid that was sent after dozens of senators called on NFL bosses to force a a change.
Under US law, people who can demonstrate that they have been “injured” by a trademarked term may file a petition to have it canceled. In 2006, a group of five Native Americans, Blackhorse among them, petitioned the appeal board to have the Redskins' registrations canceled on grounds that the term is offensive. Washington did not immediately return requests for comment on Wednesday.
Blackhorse said: “The team’s name is racist and derogatory. I’ve said it before, and I'll say it again – if people wouldn’t dare call a Native American a ‘redskin’ because they know it is offensive, how can an NFL football team have this name?” Under US law, people who can demonstrate that they have been "injured" by a trademarked term may file a petition to have it canceled. In 2006, a group of five Native Americans, Blackhorse among them, petitioned the appeal board to have the Redskins' registrations canceled on grounds that the term is offensive.
A similar petition was filed in 1992, and in 1999, the appeal board ruled that the term “redskin” was disparaging, ordering the team’s trademark registrations be canceled. Blackhorse said: "The team’s name is racist and derogatory. I’ve said it before, and I'll say it again – if people wouldn’t dare call a Native American a 'redskin' because they know it is offensive, how can an NFL football team have this name?"
A similar petition was filed in 1992, and in 1999, the appeal board ruled that the term "redskin" was disparaging, ordering the team’s trademark registrations be canceled.
The team, however, appealed the board's decision to the DC circuit court of appeals. It ruled in favour of the NFL team on technical grounds, after determining that the petitioners had waited too long after turning age 18 to file their petitions with the board.The team, however, appealed the board's decision to the DC circuit court of appeals. It ruled in favour of the NFL team on technical grounds, after determining that the petitioners had waited too long after turning age 18 to file their petitions with the board.
“This victory was a long time coming and reflects the hard work of many attorneys at our firm,” the plaintiffs' lead attorney Jesse Witten said in a statement.
The term Redskins was used in six separate trademarks authorized between 1967 and 1990.The term Redskins was used in six separate trademarks authorized between 1967 and 1990.
“We are extraordinarily gratified to have prevailed in this case,” attorney Alfred Putnam said in the statement. “The dedication and professionalism of our attorneys and the determination of our clients have resulted in a milestone victory that will serve as a historic precedent.”“We are extraordinarily gratified to have prevailed in this case,” attorney Alfred Putnam said in the statement. “The dedication and professionalism of our attorneys and the determination of our clients have resulted in a milestone victory that will serve as a historic precedent.”