This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/iraq-crisis-us-to-send-in-special-forces-as-president-obama-signals-change-of-heart-9550138.html

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Iraq crisis: US to send in Special Forces as President Obama signals change of heart Iraq crisis: US to send in Special Forces as President Obama signals change of heart
(about 1 hour later)
President Barack Obama has announced a limited first step by the US military back into Iraq by authorising the deployment a 100-strong contingent of Special Forces to help the Iraqi army contain the uprising of jihadist militants that is threatening to break the country apart. President Obama has announced a limited first step to put the US military back into Iraq by authorising the deployment up to 300 military advisers to help the Iraqi armed forces contain the uprising of jihadist militants that is threatening to break the country apart.
The plan, drawn up over recent days by the Pentagon, was endorsed by the President during an emergency meeting of his national security team in the White House earlier today. The Special Forces personnel would be deployed in groups at various Iraqi Army brigade headquarters around the country. The plan, drawn up by the Pentagon, was endorsed by the President during an emergency meeting of his full national security team in the White House earlier. The advisers, likely to be made up of special forces personnel, would probably be dispersed in groups to new joint US-Iraqi operations centres in Baghdad and in the north of the country, and would be involved in training Iraqi personnel and helping to gather and analyse intelligence.
Mr Obama, who came to office on a pledge to withdraw the US from Iraq – a process he completed when the last US soldiers left in 2011 – insisted they would be there in an advisory role only and would not engage in combat. The US has watched in dismay as the Iraqi military appeared virtually to crumble in the face of the rebel advances. While still holding back from air strikes, Mr Obama did not rule them out as a future option. “We will be prepared to take targeted and precise military action if we conclude the situation on the ground requires it,” he said. John Kerry, the Secretary of State, will consult with allies in the Middle East this weekend.
Nonetheless, his decision will stir intense controversy at home given that he has repeatedly ruled out boots on the ground over recent days. Even as the crisis in Iraq has burgeoned, sentiment on Capitol Hill has been running strongly against the US becoming involved once more in a sectarian struggle that it may not be able to influence. Should any of these personnel find themselves fired upon they would fire back. Addressing speculation about the future of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, Mr Obama said “it is not our job to choose Iraq’s leaders”. But he went on: “I don’t think it is any secret that right now at least there are deep divisions between Sunni, Shia and Kurdish leaders,” in the country.
The deployment of the Special Forces, which would be likely to include Navy Seal specialists, Army Rangers and Green Berets, comes on top of an earlier decision to send roughly 270 personnel to Iraq to beef up protection of US assets in the country, notably the embassy in Baghdad, the biggest US diplomatic complex anywhere in the world. Hinting that Mr Maliki may not be the best person to heal divisions, he added that “only those who can govern inclusively” can end the upheaval. “The test is before him and other Iraqi leaders as we speak,” Mr Obama said. “The fate of Iraq is in the balance.”
While the Iraqi government has publicly appealed for US air strikes against the insurgents, there has so far been no decision to grant that request or much appetite to, in part because of difficulty in collecting the intelligence accurately to identify suitable targets. Mr Obama has also made clear he would expect the Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to move first towards forging political reconciliation with Sunni and Kurdish elements brought into government. Mr Obama, who came to office on a pledge to withdraw the US from Iraq – a process he completed when the last US soldiers left in 2011 – insisted that the advisers he is sending would not engage in combat.  “American forces will not be returning to combat in Iraq,” he said in the White House briefing room.
Officials in Washington confirmed that the US is already flying fighter jets from an aircraft carrier in the Gulf over Iraqi territory to help gather intelligence about the size and speed of the advance by rebel fighters, most of them tied to Isis, an al-Qa’ida splinter group. They have also acknowledged conversations with Iran about the crisis. “We do not have the ability to simply solve this problem by sending in tens of thousands of troops and committing the kinds of blood and treasure that has already been expended in Iraq,” Obama told reporters. “Ultimately, this is something that is going to have to be solved by Iraqis.”
Isis militants with a captured Iraqi army vehicle at a checkpoint outside the Baiji refinery, north of Baghdad, yesterday In an interview with NBC News, the Secretary of State, John Kerry, insisted that the contacts with Iran were limited in scope and were not intended to lead to any kind of military co-ordination in Iraq. “We are interested in communicating with Iran,” he said. “That the Iranians know what we’re thinking, that we know what they’re thinking and there is a sharing of information so people aren’t making mistakes.” Isis militants with a captured Iraqi army vehicle at a checkpoint outside the Baiji refinery, north of Baghdad, yesterday Nonetheless, there will be inevitable questions asked about the risk of “mission creep” once the US re-involves itself, however limited at the outset.  Even as the crisis in Iraq has burgeoned, sentiment on Capitol Hill has been running strongly against the US becoming embroiled once more in a sectarian struggle that it may or not be able to influence. It is clear that should any of these personnel find themselves fired upon they would fire back.
The notion of a rapprochement between Iran and the US triggered by the Iraqi insurgency has rung alarm bells among some of America’s traditional allies in the region, notably Saudi Arabia. The Sunni-led kingdom considers the Shia regime in Iran as its greatest foe. Officials in Washington confirmed that the US is already flying fighter jets from an aircraft carrier in the Gulf to help gather intelligence about the size and speed of the advance by rebel fighters, most of them tied to Isis, which is linked to al-Qa’ida. They also acknowledged conversations with Iran about the crisis.
That dismay was reflected in a statement released by the Saudi embassy in London. It said Riyadh opposed “all foreign intervention and interference in the internal affairs of Iraq. Instead, we urge all the people of Iraq, whatever their religious denominations, to unite to overcome the current threats and challenges facing the country.” Earlier, Mr Kerry said the contacts with Iran were limited in scope and would not extend to military coordination in Iraq. “We are interested in communicating with Iran,” he said. “That the Iranians know what we’re thinking, that we know what they’re thinking and there is a sharing of information so people aren’t making mistakes.”
Mr Kerry meanwhile played down reports that the US is actively considering asking Mr Maliki to step down as Prime Minister. “What the United States is doing is about Iraq, it’s not about Maliki. Nothing the President decides to do is going to be focused specifically on Prime Minister Maliki. It is focused on the people of Iraq,” he said. The notion of a rapprochement between Iran and the US triggered by the Iraqi insurgency has triggered alarm bells among some of America’s traditional allies in the region, notably Saudi Arabia. The Sunni-led Kingdom considers the Shia regime in Iran as its greatest foe. In a statement, the Saudi embassy in London said Riyadh opposed “all foreign intervention and interference in the internal affairs of Iraq. Instead, we urge all the people of Iraq, whatever their religious denominations, to unite to overcome the current threats and challenges facing the country.”
Among those on Capitol Hill giving voice to worries about even a modest deployment of Special Forces was the House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi. “I think that you have to be careful sending Special Forces because that’s a number that has a tendency to grow. And so I’d like to see the context, purpose, time line and all the rest for anything like that,” she said. Among those on Capitol Hill giving voice to worries about even a modest deployment of forces was House Democrat leader Nancy Pelosi. “I think that you have to be careful sending special forces because that’s a number that has a tendency to grow. And so I’d like to see the context, purpose, timeline and all the rest for anything like that,” she said.