This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28014035

The article has changed 13 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 6 Version 7
Judge rebukes Cameron for comments on Coulson conviction Judge rebukes Cameron for comments on Coulson conviction
(35 minutes later)
A senior judge has rebuked David Cameron for commenting on the conviction of Andy Coulson while the phone-hacking trial was still going on.A senior judge has rebuked David Cameron for commenting on the conviction of Andy Coulson while the phone-hacking trial was still going on.
The prime minister apologised on Tuesday for employing Coulson, saying it had been the "wrong decision".The prime minister apologised on Tuesday for employing Coulson, saying it had been the "wrong decision".
Mr Justice Saunders said his intervention was "unsatisfactory" and set a bad example to the media.Mr Justice Saunders said his intervention was "unsatisfactory" and set a bad example to the media.
The jury has now been discharged after failing to reach verdicts on outstanding charges against Coulson.The jury has now been discharged after failing to reach verdicts on outstanding charges against Coulson.
Mr Justice Saunders will decide on Monday whether the former News of the World editor will face a retrial.Mr Justice Saunders will decide on Monday whether the former News of the World editor will face a retrial.
Mr Cameron appointed Coulson as his media chief in 2007, six months after he had quit as editor when the paper's royal editor Clive Goodman was jailed for phone hacking.Mr Cameron appointed Coulson as his media chief in 2007, six months after he had quit as editor when the paper's royal editor Clive Goodman was jailed for phone hacking.
Coulson said he knew nothing about hacking at the paper and Mr Cameron took the spin doctor into Downing Street when he became prime minister in 2010.Coulson said he knew nothing about hacking at the paper and Mr Cameron took the spin doctor into Downing Street when he became prime minister in 2010.
But Coulson was forced to quit the following year amid growing allegations about what had gone on when he was in the editor's chair at the now defunct tabloid.But Coulson was forced to quit the following year amid growing allegations about what had gone on when he was in the editor's chair at the now defunct tabloid.
Labour has asked a former senior civil servant to look at how Coulson was vetted before he started work at No 10, suggesting he did not receive the highest level of security clearance that was given to his predecessors in the role.
'Open season''Open season'
Shortly after Coulson was found guilty of conspiring to hack phones on Tuesday, Mr Cameron appeared on camera in Downing Street to issue an apology for employing him.Shortly after Coulson was found guilty of conspiring to hack phones on Tuesday, Mr Cameron appeared on camera in Downing Street to issue an apology for employing him.
At the time the jury had still to reach verdicts on separate charges of misconduct in public office against Coulson and Goodman.At the time the jury had still to reach verdicts on separate charges of misconduct in public office against Coulson and Goodman.
Speaking in court, Mr Justice Saunders said the prime minister's actions had been regrettable.Speaking in court, Mr Justice Saunders said the prime minister's actions had been regrettable.
"I consider that what has happened is unsatisfactory so far as justice and the rule of law are concerned."I consider that what has happened is unsatisfactory so far as justice and the rule of law are concerned.
"The press in court have been extremely responsible in their reporting of this case but when politicians regard it as open season, one cannot expect the press to remain silent.""The press in court have been extremely responsible in their reporting of this case but when politicians regard it as open season, one cannot expect the press to remain silent."
A lawyer for Coulson said the prime minister's intervention was "ill-advised and premature" given the jury had to reach verdicts on other outstanding charges.A lawyer for Coulson said the prime minister's intervention was "ill-advised and premature" given the jury had to reach verdicts on other outstanding charges.
A No 10 spokesman said he had taken the "best legal advice before issuing his apology yesterday".A No 10 spokesman said he had taken the "best legal advice before issuing his apology yesterday".
The BBC's Robert Peston on the vetting question
I know the answer to why Coulson was not given top level security vetting in 2010. What happened was that Cabinet Secretary Sir Jeremy Heywood had decided that too many special advisers had access to the highest level of security clearance and wanted to reduce their number. So he made a policy decision, without pressure from David Cameron, not to get Coulson cleared for access to such material. At the same time, Mr Cameron's chief of staff Ed Llewellyn was given the most vigorous degree of vetting, because of his foreign policy role.
Sir Jeremy simply felt it was inappropriate for large numbers of SPADs - as special advisers are known at Westminster - to have access to this material. He subsequently decided Coulson was a good egg and could have access to this top secret sensitive material, even though he had not been cleared. So if anyone is going to be embarrassed by the failure to vet Coulson, and Labour's investigation into this, it will be Britain's top civil servant, Sir Jeremy Heywood.
He said No 10 had responded to the judge to make it clear that the prime minister's apology was in response to the verdict delivered in open court and was restricted to that issue.He said No 10 had responded to the judge to make it clear that the prime minister's apology was in response to the verdict delivered in open court and was restricted to that issue.
The spokesman said there was widespread media coverage of the verdict and the prime minister had sought legal advice before issuing his statement.The spokesman said there was widespread media coverage of the verdict and the prime minister had sought legal advice before issuing his statement.
'Some comfort''Some comfort'
Former justice secretary Ken Clarke told the BBC that the prime minister's statement was "unwise" but insisted that the trial had not been "prejudiced".Former justice secretary Ken Clarke told the BBC that the prime minister's statement was "unwise" but insisted that the trial had not been "prejudiced".
It is not the first time that Mr Cameron has incurred the wrath of the judiciary for making public comments during a high-profile trial.It is not the first time that Mr Cameron has incurred the wrath of the judiciary for making public comments during a high-profile trial.
Last year, he gave a newspaper interview during the fraud trial of two of Nigella Lawson's former assistants in which he said he was a massive fan of the TV chef and was "on team Nigella".Last year, he gave a newspaper interview during the fraud trial of two of Nigella Lawson's former assistants in which he said he was a massive fan of the TV chef and was "on team Nigella".
The judge in that case told the jury to ignore the PM's "regrettable" comments, which he said could be construed as being "favourable" to Ms Lawson and therefore prejudicial, but refused requests to halt the trial. The two assistants were subsequently cleared of all charges.The judge in that case told the jury to ignore the PM's "regrettable" comments, which he said could be construed as being "favourable" to Ms Lawson and therefore prejudicial, but refused requests to halt the trial. The two assistants were subsequently cleared of all charges.
The officer in charge of the police investigation which led to the phone-hacking trial said she hoped its outcome would provide "some comforts" to victims of intrusion.The officer in charge of the police investigation which led to the phone-hacking trial said she hoped its outcome would provide "some comforts" to victims of intrusion.
"This investigation has never been about an attack on press freedom but one to establish whether any criminal offences had been committed," Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner Cressida Dick said."This investigation has never been about an attack on press freedom but one to establish whether any criminal offences had been committed," Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner Cressida Dick said.
"Those found not guilty have been exonerated after a thorough police investigation and fair trial. It was right that the issues were aired publicly in a court of law.""Those found not guilty have been exonerated after a thorough police investigation and fair trial. It was right that the issues were aired publicly in a court of law."
Meanwhile, in Parliament, Labour leader Ed Miliband said Coulson had "brought disgrace to Downing Street" and the prime minister had been "negligent" in hiring him.Meanwhile, in Parliament, Labour leader Ed Miliband said Coulson had "brought disgrace to Downing Street" and the prime minister had been "negligent" in hiring him.
The prime minister, he suggested, had ignored a warning from the Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg about Coulson and paid scant attention to media reports about Coulson's alleged knowledge of phone-hacking.The prime minister, he suggested, had ignored a warning from the Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg about Coulson and paid scant attention to media reports about Coulson's alleged knowledge of phone-hacking.
"Today we know that for four years the prime minister's handpicked, closest adviser was a criminal and brought disgrace to Downing Street," he told MPs."Today we know that for four years the prime minister's handpicked, closest adviser was a criminal and brought disgrace to Downing Street," he told MPs.
"We also know that the prime minister wilfully ignored multiple warnings about him.""We also know that the prime minister wilfully ignored multiple warnings about him."
Leveson Inquiry
Labour have asked the Commissioner for Public Appointments, Sir David Normington, to look at why Coulson was given a lower level of security clearance than his immediate predecessors.
Mr Cameron said Coulson had been vetted by the senior civil servant in No 10, Sir Jeremy Heywood, and that detailed facts about any involvement in phone-hacking would not have come out during the process.
He insisted that questions about Coulson's suitability for the job and his own role in his appointment had all been considered by the Leveson Inquiry into press standards.He insisted that questions about Coulson's suitability for the job and his own role in his appointment had all been considered by the Leveson Inquiry into press standards.
"Leveson made no criticism of my conduct in this regard whatsoever," he said. He looked into all of the issues about the warnings I was given and the response I gave and he made no criticism of my conduct.""Leveson made no criticism of my conduct in this regard whatsoever," he said. He looked into all of the issues about the warnings I was given and the response I gave and he made no criticism of my conduct."
After 18 months looking into the culture and practices of the press, including its relationship with politicians, the Leveson Inquiry recommended a new body be set up to regulate the industry, backed up by legislation.After 18 months looking into the culture and practices of the press, including its relationship with politicians, the Leveson Inquiry recommended a new body be set up to regulate the industry, backed up by legislation.
'Bad mistake' Labour have asked the Commissioner for Public Appointments, Sir David Normington, to look at why Coulson was not given the highest level of "developed vetting".
Writing in the Times, Conservative peer Lord Finkelstein, a former aide to Chancellor George Osborne, said the prime minister would feel "angry with himself" over Mr Cameron said the vetting process was agreed, not by him or by Coulson, but by the top civil servant in No 10, Cabinet Secretary Sir Jeremy Heywood and the "correct procedures" had been followed.
He suggested that when Coulson had been hired in 2007 the issue of hacking "hardly came into it" since "it seemed in the past, the police having investigated, charged people and moved on". He told MPs that Labour was wrong to claim the vetting process would have "got to the bottom" of Coulson's past conduct as Leveson concluded that it would "not have involved a detailed investigation of phone hacking at News of the World".
This attitude, he acknowledged, now looked "naive and almost wilfully ignorant".
And former News of the World executive editor Neil Wallis said Labour, when it was in government, "did absolutely nothing" about the issue of press regulation.
"It was only after Rupert Murdoch changed sides and voted Tory in 2010 that the Labour Party starting screaming," he told Today. "The truth of the matter is that politicians will always try and cosy up to the press."