This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-28030351

The article has changed 18 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
US prosecutors announce fraud charges against Barclays US prosecutors announce fraud charges against Barclays
(35 minutes later)
Fraud charges against Barclays in the US over the bank's "dark pool" trading operations have been announced by New York state prosecutors.Fraud charges against Barclays in the US over the bank's "dark pool" trading operations have been announced by New York state prosecutors.
Dark pools allow banks' clients to trade large blocks of shares while keeping prices more private.Dark pools allow banks' clients to trade large blocks of shares while keeping prices more private.
Prosecutors said Barclays gave clients and investors "false statements" and misrepresented the kinds of investors that were operating within their private trading stock platforms. Prosecutors said Barclays gave clients "false statements" and misrepresented the kinds of investors that were using the dark pool.
Barclays said it "noted" the complaint. Barclays said it is taking the allegations "very seriously".
'Full of predators'
New York Attorney General Schneiderman said: "The facts alleged in our complaint show that Barclays demonstrated a disturbing disregard for its investors in a systematic pattern of fraud and deceit."New York Attorney General Schneiderman said: "The facts alleged in our complaint show that Barclays demonstrated a disturbing disregard for its investors in a systematic pattern of fraud and deceit."
"Barclays grew its dark pool by telling investors they were diving into safe waters. According to the lawsuit, Barclays' dark pool was full of predators - there at Barclays' invitation," he said."Barclays grew its dark pool by telling investors they were diving into safe waters. According to the lawsuit, Barclays' dark pool was full of predators - there at Barclays' invitation," he said.
The lawsuit said that Barclay's marketing material was misleading over the extent of high frequency trading in its dark pool. The lawsuit said that Barclay's marketing material was misleading over the extent of high-frequency trading in its dark pool.
High frequency traders use fast, sophisticated trading software and can make large profits on very small moves in share prices. High-frequency traders use fast, sophisticated trading software and can make large profits on very small moves in share prices.
The lawsuit accused Barclays of telling investors trading was being closely monitored and "predatory" traders would be held accountable.The lawsuit accused Barclays of telling investors trading was being closely monitored and "predatory" traders would be held accountable.
But in fact Barclays did not prohibit a single trading from operating in its dark pool, the law suit said. 'Inside help'
But in fact Barclays did not prohibit a single trader from operating in its dark pool, the lawsuit said.
In addition, the lawsuit alleges that Barclays operated its dark pool to favour high-frequency traders and "actively sought to attract them".
In a statement the bank said: "Barclays has been cooperating with the New York attorney general and the SEC and has been examining this matter internally. The integrity of the markets is a top priority of Barclays."
The attorney general said that the investigation had been significantly helped by a number of former Barclays' employees.
Other investigations
Barclays has been the subject of several investigations, fines and settlements in recent years.
In May it was fined £26m by UK regulators after one of its traders was discovered attempting to fix the price of gold.
In April, Barclays agreed to a $280m (£167m) settlement with the US Federal Housing and Finance Authority (FHFA).
The agreement settles claims by the FHFA that Barclays misled US mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac during the housing crisis.
In 2012 it was fined £290m by UK regulators for attempting to manipulate an important lending rate, known as Libor.