This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/03/revealed-coalition-to-use-national-interest-test-to-deny-permanent-protection-visas

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Revealed: Coalition to use 'national interest test' to deny permanent protection visas Revealed: Coalition to use 'national interest test' to deny permanent protection visas
(about 1 hour later)
The Abbott government has decided to use a new “national interest test” to deny permanent protection visas to refugees who have arrived “illegally” by boat or plane in an attempt to circumvent its stunning loss in the high court last month and implement its policy to refuse permanent settlement to all boat arrivals. The Abbott government will try to use a new “national interest test” to deny permanent protection visas to refugees who have arrived “illegally” by boat or plane in an attempt to circumvent its stunning loss in the high court last month and implement its policy to refuse permanent settlement to all boat arrivals.
The extraordinary move – revealed by the government to stakeholders on Thursday – says immigration minister Scott Morrison will personally decide the new “national interest test”, which will take into account whether giving a permanent visa would:The extraordinary move – revealed by the government to stakeholders on Thursday – says immigration minister Scott Morrison will personally decide the new “national interest test”, which will take into account whether giving a permanent visa would:
The wording of the conditions makes it clear the intention is to refuse permanent visas in almost all cases.The wording of the conditions makes it clear the intention is to refuse permanent visas in almost all cases.
In two unanimous decisions last month, the high court struck down Morrison’s imposition of a cap on the number of permanent protection visas issued to asylum seekers already in Australia, a policy which had been designed to effectively ensure that no protection visas would be issued. “The minister will decide whether to grant a permanent protection visa to illegal arrivals on a case-by-case basis, after personally considering their individual circumstances,” an information sheet on the new system states.
In two unanimous decisions last month, the high court struck down Morrison’s imposition of a cap on the number of permanent protection visas issued to asylum seekers already in Australia, a policy which had been designed to effectively ensure that no permanent protection visas would be issued.
The “cap” was itself imposed as an attempt to get around the Senate’s refusal to allow the government to implement its policy to offer only temporary protection visas, and to refuse any permanent visa.The “cap” was itself imposed as an attempt to get around the Senate’s refusal to allow the government to implement its policy to offer only temporary protection visas, and to refuse any permanent visa.
The government is now drawing on a regulation in the Migration Regulations 1994 to give the minister the power to argue that it is against the national interest for any refugee to be granted a permanent visa – as the high court decision would require.The government is now drawing on a regulation in the Migration Regulations 1994 to give the minister the power to argue that it is against the national interest for any refugee to be granted a permanent visa – as the high court decision would require.
The move aims to circumvent the high court as well as the Senate, and sets the stage for a high court battle, with refugee lawyers returning to the high court Thursday to argue that the government was planning to unlawfully breach the court’s ruling. The move aims to circumvent the high court as well as the Senate, and sets the stage for a high court battle, with refugee lawyers returning to the high court Thursday to argue that the government was planning to unlawfully breach the court’s earlier ruling. Chief justice Robert French ruled that the case would be heard in two weeks.
After the court’s decision last month, a spokesman for Morrison said: "The Coalition government will not be providing permanent visas to illegal boat arrivals" but did not explain how the government would get around the court’s interpretation of the law. “The government is now trying to use yet another device to defy the clear will of the parliament and the rule of law,” said David Manne, executive director of the Refugee and Immigration Legal Centre, who brought the successful high court challenge that the government is now seeking to circumvent.
The government is now saying the new ministerial decisions will be final, and not subject to appeal. The asylum seekers denied permanent visas will be able to apply for the temporary visas – as per the government’s policy. “The minister has foreshadowed in a letter to us that he is considering refusing our client claim on national interest grounds.,” Manne said. He represents a 16-year old Ethiopian boy who came to Australia after stowing away on a ship.
“To refuse would be an extraordinary and most serious defiance of the rule of law in this country ... the government never raised these ‘national interest’ grounds during our high court challenge.”
The government is now saying the new ministerial decisions will be final, and not subject to appeal or review by the Refugee Review Tribunal. The asylum seekers denied permanent visas will be able to apply for temporary visas – as per the government’s policy.
Asylum seekers are being told that once they accept a temporary visa they will be eligible to access Medicare, unemployment benefits and counselling for trauma and torture where required.Asylum seekers are being told that once they accept a temporary visa they will be eligible to access Medicare, unemployment benefits and counselling for trauma and torture where required.
Despite having achieved its aim of stopping new asylum seekers arriving in Australia by boat by turning around asylum seekers’ vessels and processing all newly arriving asylum seekers offshore with no prospect of settlement in Australia, the government claims that it must also refuse permanent settlement to all of the 20,000 or more asylum seekers who are already in the country as an act of “deterrence”.Despite having achieved its aim of stopping new asylum seekers arriving in Australia by boat by turning around asylum seekers’ vessels and processing all newly arriving asylum seekers offshore with no prospect of settlement in Australia, the government claims that it must also refuse permanent settlement to all of the 20,000 or more asylum seekers who are already in the country as an act of “deterrence”.
Morrison says the government will take ''every step necessary to ensure that people who arrive illegally by boat are not rewarded with permanent visas''.Morrison says the government will take ''every step necessary to ensure that people who arrive illegally by boat are not rewarded with permanent visas''.
The high court case was taken on behalf of an Ethiopian boy who came to Australia by stowing away on a cargo ship and another on behalf of a Pakistani man who arrived in 2012.
In both cases the court said Morrison had to decide their case under the existing law (which provides for permanent visas), a decision that had flow-on implications for more than 1,400 other asylum seekers already in Australia and were at a similar stage in the application process when the law changed before the election.In both cases the court said Morrison had to decide their case under the existing law (which provides for permanent visas), a decision that had flow-on implications for more than 1,400 other asylum seekers already in Australia and were at a similar stage in the application process when the law changed before the election.
At the time, the Ethiopian boy’s lawyer, David Manne said: “What this means is that the government must get on with processing the refugee visas that our client and many others are entitled to, which is a permanent protection visa,” he said.
“This really is not only a major victory for this boy but also potentially for thousands of other refugees who have been left in limbo in our community and in detention that the government has sought to block from getting their protection visa. It’s also a very significant victory for the rule of law in Australia.”
A spokesman for Morrison was contacted for comment.A spokesman for Morrison was contacted for comment.