This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jul/04/airports-no-extra-delays-security

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Airports report no extra delays after security tightened Airports report no extra delays after security tightened
(about 5 hours later)
Airports say heightened security measures are not delaying passengers, amid fears that US-led changes will lead to long waits. A heightened airport security regime to combat the new terror threat of ACDs or artfully concealed bombs from returning jihadists has been put in place at British airports.
Britain's three biggest airports, Heathrow, Gatwick and Manchester, all reported business as usual and no additional waiting times, as France announced it would also be stepping up security. The measures may mean more body searches and intensive screening of smartphones, shoes and accessories – but airports insisted on Friday that the increased security was not delaying passengers.
Airports would not give details of the new measures. However, they are believed to involve adjusting the sensitivity of scanners. This means more items will trigger alarms, resulting in more body searches. More random searches of passengers are also expected. Britain's three biggest airports, Heathrow, Gatwick and Manchester, all reported business as usual and no additional waiting times.
Electronic devices such as smartphones are likely to come under greater scrutiny. Removal of belts, shoes, and other accessories, already commonly requested, is likely to become universal practice. Airports refused to give details of the measures introduced after US intelligence suggested al-Qaeda was plotting to use Western Islamists to bring down a US-bound plane. However, they are believed to involve adjusting the sensitivity of scanners, meaning more items will trigger alarms, resulting in more body searches.
Further screening and searches are likely at the gates of US-bound flights. While direct flights to the US are the main focus, enhanced screening will affect all passengers at airports with centralised security. Removal of belts, shoes and other accessories, already frequently requested, is likely to become more common. More random searches of passengers are expected and electronics such as smartphones are likely to come under greater scrutiny.
Further screening and searches are especially likely at the gates of US-bound flights. While direct flights to the US are the main focus, enhanced screening will affect all passengers at airports with centralised security.
The Department for Transport has said the majority of passengers should not experience significant disruption and there had been no change to the threat level, which remains at "substantial".The Department for Transport has said the majority of passengers should not experience significant disruption and there had been no change to the threat level, which remains at "substantial".
The DfT refused to comment further but it is believed that airports operating solely European or regional routes will not be required to implement further measures, meaning busy holiday airports such as Luton or Stansted would be unaffected. The DfT refused to elaborate but airports operating solely European or regional routes are believed not to be required to further tighten security, meaning airports such as Luton or Stansted would be unaffected.
France's aviation authority said the measures "will be carried out in a way to limit as much as possible inconvenience to passengers", but added that delays were possible The increased security is likely to have the greatest impact at Paris Charles de Gaulle, with 47 daily US flights. There are fears that Islamist radicals returning to Europe from the Middle East could be armed with ACDs, new types of bombs with less or no metal that can be carried on to a plane undetected by existing technology.
There are fears that Islamist radicals returning to Europe from the Middle East could be armed with new types of bombs, so-called "artfully concealed devices" with less or no metal, that can be carried on to a plane undetected by existing technology. Reports say US authorities believe al-Qaida operatives in Syria and Yemen had joined forces to develop bombs that could be smuggled aboard. Previous unsuccessful attempts to bomb planes include devices smuggled in shoes, underpants and inside the would-be bomber's body.
Reports say US authorities believe al-Qaida operatives in Syria and Yemen had joined forces to develop bombs that could be smuggled aboard. Previous unsuccessful attempts to bomb planes include devices smuggled on in shoes, underpants and inside the would-be bomber's body.
While drugs are frequently carried through security inside the stomachs of "mules", airports do not have technology to screen people internally.While drugs are frequently carried through security inside the stomachs of "mules", airports do not have technology to screen people internally.
Reports from some passengers travelling through Heathrow suggested that items were being swabbed for explosives. Philip Baum, of Aviation Security International, said: "When the threat is heightened one, of the things that takes place is an increase in the number of random searches and secondary searches. We will see an increase in searches at the gates and the sensitivity of the technology."
Philip Baum, an air security expert at Aviation Security International, said: "When the threat is heightened one, of the things that takes place is an increase in the number of random searches and secondary searches. We will see an increase in searches at the gates and the sensitivity of the technology."
However, he cautioned: "Whatever we do, we mustn't create long queues of people going through security or we simply create a new target."However, he cautioned: "Whatever we do, we mustn't create long queues of people going through security or we simply create a new target."
He questioned the efficacy of intensified searches of the travelling public in general. "Practically speaking, I wish we would dispense with all of it and employ profiling because that responds to whatever threat you are looking for instead," he said.He questioned the efficacy of intensified searches of the travelling public in general. "Practically speaking, I wish we would dispense with all of it and employ profiling because that responds to whatever threat you are looking for instead," he said.
Some reports from passengers travelling through Heathrow suggested that items were being swabbed for explosives. But on Friday, the threats appeared to have had little impact on journeys, with staff and passengers reporting that security checks were running smoothly.
A member of staff in terminal 3 checking people were not taking liquids in their hand luggage said there were the "same checks, more thorough" and no delays. Staff from transatlantic operators British Airways, Virgin Atlantic and American Airlines were not advising people checking in to proceed to security any earlier than usual.
Jacob Eriksson, 28, travelling home to Stockholm via terminal 5 where BA's flights to the US depart, said after clearing security: "It's just like normal, I went through in about 10 minutes. They didn't check my bag ... I didn't see many people having their bag searched but maybe there were a few more having to take off their shoes."
Sandra Kirk, 53, from Nottingham, flying to Calgary in Canada for a family holiday, said: "We didn't have to queue at all. They were searching the odd bag but no more than normal."
Heathrow, which operates dozens of US-bound flights daily, said it not expect any disruption. Gatwick said: "The airport is operating business as usual and remains vigilant on all matters relating to airport security."Heathrow, which operates dozens of US-bound flights daily, said it not expect any disruption. Gatwick said: "The airport is operating business as usual and remains vigilant on all matters relating to airport security."
A Manchester airport spokesman said: "We ask that passengers leave enough time and arrive two hours before their flight to ensure that we keep the security process moving. July is a busy month for the airport and many passengers will be using services from Manchester over the next few weeks. Our security officers are on hand to give advice and we ask that passengers work with us so that we can ensure we get people to their gate on time, in a safe manner." A Manchester airport spokesman said: "We ask that passengers leave enough time and arrive two hours before their flight to ensure that we keep the security process moving. July is a busy month for the airport."
France's aviation authority said the measures would "be carried out in a way to limit as much as possible inconvenience to passengers, however delays are possible.", but added that delays were possible. The increased security is likely to have the greatest impact at Paris Charles de Gaulle, with 47 daily US flights.