This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/15/orwell-would-recognise-the-logic-of-postcolonialism-at-play-in-west-papua

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Orwell would recognise the logic of postcolonialism at play in West Papua Orwell would recognise the logic of postcolonialism at play in West Papua
(about 1 month later)
Few Few people know that George Orwell, better known as the author of the dystopian novel 1984, is one of the earlier founders of postcolonial studies. Orwell’s best known contribution to the field is Burmese Days, but his earliest contribution was How a Nation Is Exploited – The British Empire in Burma. Published in the French journal Le Progrès civique, Orwell describes how the land, labour and resources of one country – that is, Burma - are used to finance the industrial development of another – in this case, Britain.
people know that George Orwell, better known as the author of the dystopian Care is taken to avoid technical and industrial training [in Burma]. This rule, observed throughout India, aims to stop India from becoming an industrial country capable of competing with England.
novel 1984, is one of The role of the colony, then, is under-development for the sake of the coloniser’s development. This is the logic of colonialism.
the earlier founders of postcolonial studies. Orwell’s best known contribution One might think this is merely of historical interest. If only. There is a newly industrialised country on our doorstep and it is using a colony to finance its growth. Orwell would recognise the coloniser – Indonesia – and the logic of colonialism in the West Papua region.
to the field is Burmese Days, but his Indonesia annexed West Papua in the 1960s. Thus began and thus continues the deadliest postcolonial struggle in Oceania. In the past half century the Indonesian security forces have killed as many as 500,000 West Papuans. Last year the Asian Human Rights Commission released The Neglected Genocide, a report on atrocities committed in 1977 and 1978. Survivors describe how they escaped the killing fields while others recount their run-ins with the torture squads. Violence wasn’t just something that happened in West Papua, it was a form of government.
earliest contribution was How a Nation Is Exploited – One would hope that, some 40 years later, things have improved. It doesn’t seem so. According to the Free West Papua Movement a local independence leader was shot dead on his motorcycle in June. The UNPO reports that local democracy activists have been beaten and arrested for handing out leaflets encouraging West Papuans to boycott last week’s presidential election. In the run up to the election the security forces were put on full alert.
The British Empire in Burma. Published in the French journal Le But why does Indonesia cling to West Papua? The basis of Indonesia’s claim to sovereignty is the farcical Act of Free Choice”in 1969. The act was a nominal referendum where a little over 1000 men – less than 1% of the eligible voting population - agreed to transfer sovereignty to Indonesia. The result was controlled - an act of forced choice – with the military carefully selecting and coercing the participants. The Indonesian government has exercised its claim to sovereignty at the end of an assault rifle ever since.
Progrès civique, Orwell describes how the land, labour and resources of one But that claim is only a convenience. West Papuans are ethnically Melanesian and geographically part of Oceania – Jakarta acknowledges this much – but, importantly, the West Papua region is home to the world’s largest goldmine, third largest copper mine and rich mineral deposits. Freeport-McMoRan, the American company that operates the Grasberg mine, is Indonesia’s largest taxpayer. The company has contributed more than $12 billion to Jakarta’s coffers since 1991. Rather than relying on private security at the mine, Freeport-McMoRan pays the Indonesian security forces. Jakarta is happy to oblige.
country – that is, Burma - are used to finance the industrial development of Orwell would recognise the logic of colonialism here. West Papua has largely missed the Indonesian industrial revolution, instead being compelled to finance it. In many respects the West Papuan struggle is the story of Indigenous peoples the world over: exploitation.
another – in this case, Britain. Former Australian prime minister Robert Menzies warned of as much in the 1960s when he said that Indonesian control of West Papua would merely substitute white colonialism for “brown colonialism”. We did not listen then, will we listen now?
Care is
taken to avoid technical and industrial training [in Burma]. This rule,
observed throughout India, aims to stop India from becoming an industrial
country capable of competing with England.
The role of the colony, then, is
under-development for the sake of the coloniser’s development. This is the
logic of colonialism.
One might
think this is merely of historical interest. If only. There is a newly
industrialised country on our doorstep and it is using a colony to finance its
growth. Orwell would recognise the coloniser – Indonesia – and the logic of
colonialism in the West Papua region.
Indonesia
annexed West Papua in the 1960s. Thus began and thus continues the deadliest
postcolonial struggle in Oceania. In the past half century the Indonesian
security forces have killed as many as 500,000 West Papuans. Last year the Asian Human Rights Commission
released The Neglected Genocide, a report on atrocities committed in 1977 and 1978. Survivors describe
how they escaped the killing fields while others recount their run-ins with the
torture squads. Violence wasn’t just something that happened in West Papua, it
was a form of government.
One would
hope that, some 40 years later, things have improved. It doesn’t seem so. According
to the Free West Papua Movement a local independence leader was shot dead on his motorcycle in June. The
UNPO reports that local
democracy activists have been beaten and arrested for handing out leaflets
encouraging West Papuans to boycott last week’s presidential election. In the
run up to the election the security forces were put on full alert.
But why
does Indonesia cling to West Papua? The basis of Indonesia’s claim to
sovereignty is the farcical Act of
Free Choice”in 1969. The
act was a nominal referendum where a little over 1000 men – less than 1% of the
eligible voting population - agreed to transfer sovereignty to Indonesia. The
result was controlled - an act of forced choice – with the military carefully
selecting and coercing the participants. The Indonesian government has
exercised its claim to sovereignty at the end of an assault rifle ever since.
But that
claim is only a convenience. West Papuans are ethnically Melanesian and
geographically part of Oceania – Jakarta acknowledges this much – but,
importantly, the West Papua region is home to the world’s largest goldmine,
third largest copper mine and rich mineral deposits. Freeport-McMoRan, the
American company that operates the Grasberg mine, is Indonesia’s largest taxpayer. The company has contributed more than $12 billion to Jakarta’s coffers
since 1991. Rather than relying on private security at the mine,
Freeport-McMoRan pays the Indonesian security forces. Jakarta is happy to oblige.
Orwell
would recognise the logic of colonialism here. West Papua has largely missed
the Indonesian industrial revolution, instead being compelled to finance it. In
many respects the West Papuan struggle is the story of Indigenous peoples the
world over: exploitation.
Former Australian prime minister Robert Menzies
warned of as much in the 1960s when he said that Indonesian control of West
Papua would merely substitute white colonialism for “brown colonialism”. We did
not listen then, will we listen now?