This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/jul/15/why-modern-bathroom-wasteful-unhealthy-design

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Why the modern bathroom is a wasteful, unhealthy design Why the modern bathroom is a wasteful, unhealthy design
(35 minutes later)
For centuries, the people of London and otherFor centuries, the people of London and other
big cities got their cooking and washing water from rivers or wells,big cities got their cooking and washing water from rivers or wells,
limiting their consumption to pretty much what they could carry. They limiting their consumption to pretty much what they could carry. They
dumped their waste into brick-lined cesspits that would be emptied by the nightdumped their waste into brick-lined cesspits that would be emptied by the night
soil men, who sold it as fertilizer or dumped it off Dung Pier into the Thames.soil men, who sold it as fertilizer or dumped it off Dung Pier into the Thames.
Liquid waste might be dumped into gutters in the middle of the road.Liquid waste might be dumped into gutters in the middle of the road.
And then in 1854, in the middle of a choleraAnd then in 1854, in the middle of a cholera
epidemic in London, Dr John Snow mapped where victims died and found that theepidemic in London, Dr John Snow mapped where victims died and found that the
deaths seemed concentrated around one of those pumps, at 37 Broad Street. Whendeaths seemed concentrated around one of those pumps, at 37 Broad Street. When
he had the handle removed from the pump, the cholera epidemic stoppedhe had the handle removed from the pump, the cholera epidemic stopped
immediately. He had made the first verifiable connection between human waste andimmediately. He had made the first verifiable connection between human waste and
disease.disease.
After people realised that excrement plus drinkingAfter people realised that excrement plus drinking
water equals death, parliament passed the Metropolitan Water Act to “make provision for securing the supply to the metropolis ofwater equals death, parliament passed the Metropolitan Water Act to “make provision for securing the supply to the metropolis of
pure and wholesome water”. Public pumps were replaced with pipes deliveringpure and wholesome water”. Public pumps were replaced with pipes delivering
water directly to homes.water directly to homes.
This was perhaps the greatest, but now undervalued, convenience. Instead of carrying water, suddenly everyone had as much as they couldThis was perhaps the greatest, but now undervalued, convenience. Instead of carrying water, suddenly everyone had as much as they could
use, all the time, with the turn of a tap. Not surprisingly, according to Abbyuse, all the time, with the turn of a tap. Not surprisingly, according to Abby
Rockefeller in Civilization and Sludge, the average water use per personRockefeller in Civilization and Sludge, the average water use per person
went quickly from three gallons of water per person to 30 and perhaps as much as 100went quickly from three gallons of water per person to 30 and perhaps as much as 100
gallons per person.gallons per person.
The toilet was an almost trivial addition; itThe toilet was an almost trivial addition; it
had been around for a while (John Harington, a member of Elizabeth I’s privyhad been around for a while (John Harington, a member of Elizabeth I’s privy
council invented a flush toilet, but there is no evidence that she ever triedcouncil invented a flush toilet, but there is no evidence that she ever tried
it) but was pretty useless without a water supply. But it became incrediblyit) but was pretty useless without a water supply. But it became incredibly
convenient to just to wash the poop away. Except now there was more faecal effluence than anyone knew what to do with, overflowing the cesspits and flowing into theconvenient to just to wash the poop away. Except now there was more faecal effluence than anyone knew what to do with, overflowing the cesspits and flowing into the
gutters and sewers originally designed for rainwater that all led to thegutters and sewers originally designed for rainwater that all led to the
Thames. The result was even more cholera and disease.Thames. The result was even more cholera and disease.
The environmentalists of the day tried to stopThe environmentalists of the day tried to stop
this; they promoted earth toilets that would keep human waste separate, thatthis; they promoted earth toilets that would keep human waste separate, that
would treat it as a resource. Rockefeller writes: “The engineers were divided againwould treat it as a resource. Rockefeller writes: “The engineers were divided again
between those who believed in the value of human excreta to agriculture andbetween those who believed in the value of human excreta to agriculture and
those who did not. The believers argued in favour of 'sewagethose who did not. The believers argued in favour of 'sewage
farming', the practice of irrigating neighbouring farms with municipalfarming', the practice of irrigating neighbouring farms with municipal
sewage. The second group, arguing that 'running water purifiessewage. The second group, arguing that 'running water purifies
itself' (the more current slogan among sanitary engineers: 'theitself' (the more current slogan among sanitary engineers: 'the
solution to pollution is dilution'), argued for piping sewage into lakes,solution to pollution is dilution'), argued for piping sewage into lakes,
rivers, and oceans.”rivers, and oceans.”
But they never really had a chance to debate theBut they never really had a chance to debate the
issue; it was a done deal as people rushed to install convenient flush toilets.issue; it was a done deal as people rushed to install convenient flush toilets.
Soon every contaminated stream and gutter was being enlarged and covered Soon every contaminated stream and gutter was being enlarged and covered
over and turned into what remains today’s urban sewer system. In the Guardian, Blake Morrison described itover and turned into what remains today’s urban sewer system. In the Guardian, Blake Morrison described it
as being “on a par, aesthetically, with the canal bridgesas being “on a par, aesthetically, with the canal bridges
and railway viaducts of the Victorian era.” But it was really just going with the flow instead of thinkingand railway viaducts of the Victorian era.” But it was really just going with the flow instead of thinking
about the consequences.about the consequences.
Inside our houses, the architects and homeownersInside our houses, the architects and homeowners
of the late 19th century were as confused as the engineers about what to do.of the late 19th century were as confused as the engineers about what to do.
People had washstands in their bedrooms, so at first they just stuck sinks andPeople had washstands in their bedrooms, so at first they just stuck sinks and
taps into them, and put the toilet into whatever closet in the hall or spacetaps into them, and put the toilet into whatever closet in the hall or space
under the stairs that they could find, hence the “water closet.” They quickly realised thatunder the stairs that they could find, hence the “water closet.” They quickly realised that
it didn’t make a lot of sense to run plumbing to everyit didn’t make a lot of sense to run plumbing to every
bedroom when it was cheaper to bring it all to one place, and the idea of thebedroom when it was cheaper to bring it all to one place, and the idea of the
bathroom was born. Since the early adopters, then as now, were the rich with abathroom was born. Since the early adopters, then as now, were the rich with a
few rooms to spare, they were often lavish, with all the fixtures encased infew rooms to spare, they were often lavish, with all the fixtures encased in
wood like the commodes they replaced.wood like the commodes they replaced.
As germ theory became accepted at the end of theAs germ theory became accepted at the end of the
19th century, the bathroom became a hospital room, with fixtures of19th century, the bathroom became a hospital room, with fixtures of
porcelain and lined with tile or marble. These materials are expensive; as theporcelain and lined with tile or marble. These materials are expensive; as the
bathroom became mainstream and accessible to all classes, it got smaller. Thebathroom became mainstream and accessible to all classes, it got smaller. The
plumbers lined everything up in a row to use less pipe. By about 1910 theplumbers lined everything up in a row to use less pipe. By about 1910 the
bathroom is pretty much indistinguishable from the ones built today.bathroom is pretty much indistinguishable from the ones built today.
Nobody seriously paused to think about theNobody seriously paused to think about the
different functions and their needs; they just took the position that if waterdifferent functions and their needs; they just took the position that if water
comes in and water goes out, it is all pretty much the same and should be incomes in and water goes out, it is all pretty much the same and should be in
the same room. Nobody thought about how the water from a shower or bathtub (greywater) is different from the water from a toilet (blackwater); it all justthe same room. Nobody thought about how the water from a shower or bathtub (greywater) is different from the water from a toilet (blackwater); it all just
went down the same drain which connected to the same sewer pipe that gatheredwent down the same drain which connected to the same sewer pipe that gathered
the rainwater from the streets, and carried it away to be dumped in the riverthe rainwater from the streets, and carried it away to be dumped in the river
or lake.or lake.
It is hard to find something that we actually got right in the modernIt is hard to find something that we actually got right in the modern
bathroom. The toilet is too high (our bodies were designed to squat), the sink isbathroom. The toilet is too high (our bodies were designed to squat), the sink is
too low and almost useless; the shower is a deathtrap (an American dies everytoo low and almost useless; the shower is a deathtrap (an American dies every
day from bath or shower accidents). We fill this tiny, inadequately ventilatedday from bath or shower accidents). We fill this tiny, inadequately ventilated
room with toxic chemicals ranging from nail polish to tile cleaners. We flushroom with toxic chemicals ranging from nail polish to tile cleaners. We flush
the toilet and send bacteria into the air, with our toothbrush in a cup a fewthe toilet and send bacteria into the air, with our toothbrush in a cup a few
feet away. We take millions of gallons of fresh water and contaminate it withfeet away. We take millions of gallons of fresh water and contaminate it with
toxic chemicals, human waste, antibiotics and birth control hormones intoxic chemicals, human waste, antibiotics and birth control hormones in
quantities large enough to the gender of fish.quantities large enough to the gender of fish.
We mix up all our bodily functions in a machineWe mix up all our bodily functions in a machine
designed by engineers on the basis of the plumbing system, not human needs. Thedesigned by engineers on the basis of the plumbing system, not human needs. The
result is a toxic output of contaminated water, questionable air quality andresult is a toxic output of contaminated water, questionable air quality and
incredible waste. We just can’t afford to do it this wayincredible waste. We just can’t afford to do it this way
any more.any more.
What could the bathroom of the future look like?What could the bathroom of the future look like?
Tamsin Oglesby’s play The War Next Door opened to mixed reviews in 2007;Tamsin Oglesby’s play The War Next Door opened to mixed reviews in 2007;
one critic said “the shoddy script and hammyone critic said “the shoddy script and hammy
acting left me so bored that I contemplated impaling myself on my biro". However, one prop got worldwide attention, as noted in theacting left me so bored that I contemplated impaling myself on my biro". However, one prop got worldwide attention, as noted in the
synopsis: “Sophie and Max are a thoroughly modern Britishsynopsis: “Sophie and Max are a thoroughly modern British
couple, cosmopolitan, open-minded. They’ve even constructed their own eco loo (well, it does save 30couple, cosmopolitan, open-minded. They’ve even constructed their own eco loo (well, it does save 30
litres of water a day).”litres of water a day).”
That’s seriously open-minded, having a composting toilet in a LondonThat’s seriously open-minded, having a composting toilet in a London
home. It also does a lot more than just save 30 litres of water; ithome. It also does a lot more than just save 30 litres of water; it
eliminates blackwater (contaminated with feaces) as distinct from greywater, what comes out of our eliminates blackwater (contaminated with faeces) as distinct from greywater, what comes out of our
sinks, laundries and showers, which can be reused in the garden. Lots of peoplesinks, laundries and showers, which can be reused in the garden. Lots of people
are doing greywater diversion and using it to flush their toilets, but thatare doing greywater diversion and using it to flush their toilets, but that
just turns it black. A composting toilet is a much more grand gesture, thatjust turns it black. A composting toilet is a much more grand gesture, that
people will resist; I was once told that: “No one will want this inside their house. I know this, because Ipeople will resist; I was once told that: “No one will want this inside their house. I know this, because I
still have a few teeth in my head and a few friends in town.”still have a few teeth in my head and a few friends in town.”
Perhaps. However, if we are going to doPerhaps. However, if we are going to do
something about the incredible waste of water that is the modern bathroom,something about the incredible waste of water that is the modern bathroom,
radical changes may be required. A lot of Britons are proud of going net-zeroradical changes may be required. A lot of Britons are proud of going net-zero
or off-grid with their electricity and energy supply; it’s time to consider going off-pipe too. According to the Parliamentaryor off-grid with their electricity and energy supply; it’s time to consider going off-pipe too. According to the Parliamentary
Office of Science and Technology (Post): “Over 10bn litres of sewage are produced every day in EnglandOffice of Science and Technology (Post): “Over 10bn litres of sewage are produced every day in England
and Wales. It takes approximately 6.34 GW hours of energy to treat this volume ofand Wales. It takes approximately 6.34 GW hours of energy to treat this volume of
sewage, almost 1% of the average daily electricity consumption of Englandsewage, almost 1% of the average daily electricity consumption of England
and Wales.” You’re not net-zero if you are flushing your waste into the sewer.and Wales.” You’re not net-zero if you are flushing your waste into the sewer.
Composting toilets are not yet flush-and-forgetComposting toilets are not yet flush-and-forget
like a conventional loo, but they are getting close. There are vacuum toiletslike a conventional loo, but they are getting close. There are vacuum toilets
that suck it all away to the composter using almost no water; there are foamthat suck it all away to the composter using almost no water; there are foam
flush toilets that are almost indistinguishable from conventional bowls.flush toilets that are almost indistinguishable from conventional bowls.
Companies such as Clivus Multrum supply not only the toilet and the composter, butCompanies such as Clivus Multrum supply not only the toilet and the composter, but
also a service of emptying it, just like the night soil men did 200 years ago.also a service of emptying it, just like the night soil men did 200 years ago.
Shower like the JapaneseShower like the Japanese
The other source of waste and inefficiency isThe other source of waste and inefficiency is
the shower. They are designed so badly; the shower heads aim down, when really,the shower. They are designed so badly; the shower heads aim down, when really,
like a bidet, they should probably aim up. The water runs constantly, even whenlike a bidet, they should probably aim up. The water runs constantly, even when
you are applying soap or shampoo. You are usually standing in a slipperyyou are applying soap or shampoo. You are usually standing in a slippery
dangerous tub or in a tiny stall where you cannot move out of the water stream.dangerous tub or in a tiny stall where you cannot move out of the water stream.
People who care about water waste, either for cost or environmental reasons,People who care about water waste, either for cost or environmental reasons,
take short showers or have miserable low flow shower heads. It’s just not fun.take short showers or have miserable low flow shower heads. It’s just not fun.
In Japan, you sit on a stool and have a bucket,In Japan, you sit on a stool and have a bucket,
sponge, ladle and hand shower that you only turn on when you need it. You cansponge, ladle and hand shower that you only turn on when you need it. You can
sit comfortably for as long as you like, in no danger of slipping, use thesit comfortably for as long as you like, in no danger of slipping, use the
ladle or the hand shower to rinse. It’s really a lovely experience. It uses 10% of the waterladle or the hand shower to rinse. It’s really a lovely experience. It uses 10% of the water
compared to a normal shower. If you do follow up with a hot bath, at least thecompared to a normal shower. If you do follow up with a hot bath, at least the
water is shared among the whole family.water is shared among the whole family.
When thinking about the bathroom of the future,When thinking about the bathroom of the future,
we should look more closely at the Japanese bathrooms of the past. They kept their water supply and their wastewe should look more closely at the Japanese bathrooms of the past. They kept their water supply and their waste
management far apart, and rarely had epidemics of typhoid or cholera. Theymanagement far apart, and rarely had epidemics of typhoid or cholera. They
would never think of putting the toilet in the same room as the tub.would never think of putting the toilet in the same room as the tub.
Instead of treating bathing as a chore, they turned it into a truly Instead of treating bathing as a chore, they turned it into a truly
enjoyable ritual.enjoyable ritual.
The Japanese used to sell their excrement; the richThe Japanese used to sell their excrement; the rich
got more money for theirs because they had better diets and made better qualitygot more money for theirs because they had better diets and made better quality
fertilizer. They farmed more intensively and had fewer farm animals, (as wefertilizer. They farmed more intensively and had fewer farm animals, (as we
probably should) and needed a lot of it. In China, the proverb said: “Treasure night soil as if it were gold.” It was valuable stuff then and still is today.probably should) and needed a lot of it. In China, the proverb said: “Treasure night soil as if it were gold.” It was valuable stuff then and still is today.
In a world where we are running out of freshIn a world where we are running out of fresh
water, making artificial fertilizer from fossil fuels and approaching peakwater, making artificial fertilizer from fossil fuels and approaching peak
phosphorus, it is idiotic and almost criminal that we pay huge amounts inphosphorus, it is idiotic and almost criminal that we pay huge amounts in
taxes to use drinking water to flush away our personal fertilizer andtaxes to use drinking water to flush away our personal fertilizer and
phosphorus and dump it in the ocean. In the future, they should be paying us.phosphorus and dump it in the ocean. In the future, they should be paying us.
Bathrooms and toilets - a history in picturesBathrooms and toilets - a history in pictures
Lloyd Alter is managing editor of TreeHugger.Lloyd Alter is managing editor of TreeHugger.
Interested in finding out more about how you can live better? Take a look at this month's Live Better Challenge here.Interested in finding out more about how you can live better? Take a look at this month's Live Better Challenge here.
The Live BetterThe Live Better
Challenge is funded by Unilever; its focus is sustainable living. All Challenge is funded by Unilever; its focus is sustainable living. All
content is editorially independent except for pieces labelled content is editorially independent except for pieces labelled
advertisement feature. Find out more here.advertisement feature. Find out more here.