This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2014/jul/16/dailymail-women
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Daily Mail goes back in time to analyse female MPs as sex objects | Daily Mail goes back in time to analyse female MPs as sex objects |
| (about 4 hours later) | |
| One of the mystifying things about the Daily Mail is that although it boasts the largest proportion of female readers among national newspapers it is so blatantly sexist in tone and content. | One of the mystifying things about the Daily Mail is that although it boasts the largest proportion of female readers among national newspapers it is so blatantly sexist in tone and content. |
| Consider, for instance, today's spread on David Cameron's reshuffle. Above the nine pictures of Tory women entering or leaving No 10, is the headline "Esther, the queen of the Downing Street catwalk." | Consider, for instance, today's spread on David Cameron's reshuffle. Above the nine pictures of Tory women entering or leaving No 10, is the headline "Esther, the queen of the Downing Street catwalk." |
| Catwalk? Can they be serious? This was not a fashion parade. These were not models on a runway (to use the less sexist US term). It was a wholly inappropriate description, redolent of the red-top tabloids that the Mail affects to despise. | Catwalk? Can they be serious? This was not a fashion parade. These were not models on a runway (to use the less sexist US term). It was a wholly inappropriate description, redolent of the red-top tabloids that the Mail affects to despise. |
| Esther McVey and her eight political colleagues deserve better than to be treated as clothes horses. | Esther McVey and her eight political colleagues deserve better than to be treated as clothes horses. |
| The Mail Online version was hardly better: 'Cameron's cuties' make their presence felt as they march into Downing Street following dramatic Cabinet reshuffle. Those quote marks do not let the paper off the hook.The other odd reality is that the Mail boasts a large number of females on its editorial staff. Yet these women do not only appear content with the output, they actually write stuff they must know is demeaning to their own gender. | The Mail Online version was hardly better: 'Cameron's cuties' make their presence felt as they march into Downing Street following dramatic Cabinet reshuffle. Those quote marks do not let the paper off the hook.The other odd reality is that the Mail boasts a large number of females on its editorial staff. Yet these women do not only appear content with the output, they actually write stuff they must know is demeaning to their own gender. |
| I accept that in the hierarchical nature of male-dominated newsrooms they are powerless to prevent it. But do they have to collude in the objectification of women? | I accept that in the hierarchical nature of male-dominated newsrooms they are powerless to prevent it. But do they have to collude in the objectification of women? |
| For example, McVey's image was "analysed" by Catherine Ostler, a former editor of Tatler and a journalist whose work I generally admire, in terms of her hair, bag, dress, shoes and - would you believe it? - legs. | For example, McVey's image was "analysed" by Catherine Ostler, a former editor of Tatler and a journalist whose work I generally admire, in terms of her hair, bag, dress, shoes and - would you believe it? - legs. |
| The other eight received similar treatment. This one was "a little bit too Eighties air hostess". Another wore "sensible shoes". A third was criticised for wearing "a bold teal jacket" two sizes too big for her. And so on and on... | The other eight received similar treatment. This one was "a little bit too Eighties air hostess". Another wore "sensible shoes". A third was criticised for wearing "a bold teal jacket" two sizes too big for her. And so on and on... |
| An accompanying piece, written by a man - political editor James Chapman - reported that McVey "sashayed into Downing Street" with "her blonde mane thrown backwards as in a shampoo advert." | An accompanying piece, written by a man - political editor James Chapman - reported that McVey "sashayed into Downing Street" with "her blonde mane thrown backwards as in a shampoo advert." |
| I seem to recall reading this kind of stuff in the Daily Mirror in the 1950s. We, the people, have moved on. The Mail clearly hasn't. | I seem to recall reading this kind of stuff in the Daily Mirror in the 1950s. We, the people, have moved on. The Mail clearly hasn't. |
| • The fashion journalist's view: is it OK to talk about politicians' clothes? |