This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/08/world/asia/kerry-visits-afghanistan-to-urge-election-deal.html

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Kerry Visits Afghanistan to Urge Election Deal Kerry Visits Afghanistan to Urge Deal on the Election
(about 9 hours later)
KABUL, Afghanistan — Secretary of State John Kerry made an unannounced visit to Afghanistan on Thursday in a bid to rescue the political agreement he negotiated almost four weeks ago. KABUL, Afghanistan — Secretary of State John Kerry made an unannounced visit here on Thursday to press Afghanistan’s rival presidential candidates to form a government of national unity and rescue the political agreement he negotiated almost four weeks ago.
The Obama administration is pressing the Afghans to inaugurate a president before NATO nations hold a summit meeting in Wales in early September. The Obama administration is urging Afghan politicians to accept the result of an internationally monitored audit so a new president can be inaugurated before NATO nations hold a summit meeting in Wales in early September.
“We would like to see the president inaugurated and arriving at NATO as part of a government of national unity,” said a senior State Department official who is travelling with Mr. Kerry. “We would like to see the president inaugurated and arriving at NATO as part of a government of national unity,” said a senior State Department official who is traveling with Mr. Kerry.
But that will require the two sides to stop squabbling so that the vote auditing process can be accelerated and power-sharing issues can be resolved. Getting a new Afghan president into office would require the rival campaigns of Abdullah Abdullah and Ashraf Ghani to stop the infighting that has delayed the auditing of votes from the June 14 runoff presidential election, which was marred by allegations of widespread fraud.
A delay in picking a president could have enormous ramifications for Afghanistan’s security. More important, it would also require the two sides to resolve thorny power-sharing arrangements.
Hamid Karzai, who has remained Afghanistan’s president while the election results are being sorted out, has left to his successor the decision of whether to sign two security accords that would provide the legal basis for American and other NATO troops to remain after 2014. Mr. Kerry met separately Thursday evening at the American Embassy compound with Mr. Ghani and Mr. Abdullah, and with Jan Kubis, the senior United Nations official here.
Ashraf Ghani and Abdullah Abdullah, the two political opponents who squared off in the June runoff, have each made it clear that they would sign the accords. Neither American nor Afghan officials disclosed what was discussed.
But because of the infighting over the ballot recount procedures, only 2,400 of the nation’s 23,000 ballot boxes have so far been audited. But when Mr. Kerry asked Mr. Ghani how he had marked the recent end of Ramadan, the monthlong Muslim holiday that involves long days of fasting, the Afghan candidate wryly offered a sense of the political mood.
Mr. Kerry plans to meet with Mr. Ghani, Mr. Abdullah and with Jan Kubis, the senior United Nations official here, on Thursday night. Mr. Kerry is also scheduled to see Mr. Karzai and to hold follow-up meetings before leaving on Friday for a conference of Asian nations in Myanmar. “On Ramadan, tempers go up,” Mr. Ghani said.
During his previous visit to Kabul last month, Mr. Kerry brokered a deal that called for all eight million votes cast in the runoff election to be audited under international supervision. “Oh, I know,” Mr. Kerry replied.
The agreement also outlined a power-sharing arrangement in which the loser of the election, or a representative of his choice, would serve under the president as the government’s chief executive officer. Mr. Kerry plans to meet again with the candidates on Friday and with President Hamid Karzai before leaving for a meeting of Asian nations in Myanmar.
After a loya jirga, or grand council, is held in two years, the chief executive post would be elevated to that of an executive prime minister, under the plan. Posts in the major security and economic ministries would be shared equally between the two sides. A delay in picking a president could have enormous ramifications for Afghanistan’s security. Mr. Karzai has left to his successor the decision of whether to sign two security accords that would provide the legal basis for American and other NATO troops to remain after this year.
The one-page agreement has not yet been signed by the candidates or formally made public. And since the agreement was announced, the understanding has begun to fray. Aides to Mr. Ghani and Mr. Abdullah have argued about the procedures for invalidating fraudulent ballots. Mr. Ghani and Mr. Abdullah have each made clear that he would sign those accords if he became president.
With the outcome of the election still uncertain, and each side’s political patronage networks at stake, the candidates have been reluctant to complete the power-sharing arrangements. During his visit to Kabul last month, Mr. Kerry brokered a deal that called for all eight million votes cast in the runoff in June to be audited under international supervision.
The senior State Department official asserted that the two sides had recently begun to work more collaboratively. But he acknowledged that Mr. Kerry would press them to reaffirm their commitment to the agreement with an eye to meeting the NATO summit deadline. But because of disputes over the ballot recount procedures, only 2,400 of the nation’s 23,000 ballot boxes have so far been audited.
“What is most important right now is not whether it is signed or not,” the official said of the agreement, “but really whether both sides demonstrate that they continue to be committed to it, that they are not walking back from the commitments.” The political side of the agreement Mr. Kerry brokered has been even more problematic. It outlined a power-sharing arrangement in which the loser of the election, or a representative of his choice, would serve under the president as the government’s chief executive.
“We need to continue to help to accelerate it,” he added. After a loya jirga, or grand council, is held in two years, the chief executive post would be elevated to that of an executive prime minister, according to the plan.
Mr. Kerry’s visit follows the shooting death on Tuesday of Maj. Gen. Harold J. Greene during a so-called insider attack by an Afghan soldier at Afghanistan’s premier military academy near Kabul. Fifteen people were shot before Afghan troops rushed in and killed the soldier, who was identified on Wednesday as Rafiullah, from the Jani Khel district of Paktika Province. Posts in the major security and economic ministries would be shared equally between the two sides.
The State Department official, who requested anonymity in accordance with the agency’s procedures for briefing reporters, said the candidates recognized that they needed to make headway on the political track and insisted there had been recent indications of “some collaborative work.”
But so far much of the deal’s contents — a “framework” is what officials are calling it — remains a mystery because neither Mr. Abdullah nor Mr. Ghani has publicly detailed what he is prepared to accept.
Instead, each side has cast the deal in ways most likely to appeal to its hard-line supporters. Mr. Abdullah’s camp has portrayed it as a step toward a parliamentary system, which he has long favored, while Mr. Ghani has played down the significance of the chief executive and prime minister roles, preferring to emphasize the primacy of the president.
In addition, Mr. Ghani has refused to sign the deal. Without a signature, the deal may not be viewed as binding by many Afghans, though American officials have insisted it would be good enough for the two men to simply lay out what they agreed to.
“They’ve made no progress at all,” said a senior Afghan official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid being seen as weighing in on a political matter. “There is very little that the supporters of each one of the men will agree to, and so they can’t agree to much when they are face to face.”
Further complicating matters is the role of Mr. Karzai, whose enmity toward Mr. Abdullah is longstanding and who has been said to be pushing Mr. Ghani to not compromise on the political side of the Kerry deal.
Aimal Faizi, a spokesman for Mr. Karzai, said in a telephone interview that it was absolutely “baseless” that the president supported any candidate.
“When the president meets with Mr. Kerry in the morning, he is going to tell him, ‘Let’s get it done as soon as possible, let’s get it done this month.’ ”
The NATO summit meeting next month has become an important deadline for settling on an Afghan president for several reasons.
The United States and its NATO partners want to see a new Afghan president inaugurated and security agreements signed so they can make plans for a training and advisory role after 2014.
And the presence of a new Afghan president would also enable the alliance to say that the nation was making progress after long years of NATO involvement there.