This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/oscar-pistorius-trial-defence-continues-closing-arguments-9656011.html
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Oscar Pistorius trial: Defence compares athlete to 'woman who shoots abusive husband' | |
| (about 1 hour later) | |
| The defence for Oscar Pistorius compared the athlete's lifelong insecurities as a result of his double amputation to an abused woman who shoots her husband after enduring years of domestic violence. | |
| Continuing his closing arguments, defence counsel Barry Roux told the court Pistorius had "built up" an exaggerated fear of crime and snapped the same way a victim of domestic abuse would have done the night he shot girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp. | |
| "You have the effect of the slow burn of insecurities over many years. You're an athlete. You're trained to react to a sound, and he stands there now with his finger ready to fire, and then..." Mr Roux told the court, slapping his hand on the desk to mimic the sound Pistorius claims led him to believe an intruder was coming out to attack him. | |
| Throughout the trial, the defence has painted a picture of vulnerable man marked by tragedy after undergoing a double amputation as a child and losing his mother at a young age. Far from enjoying his status as South Africa's national hero, the defence argues Pistorius has struggled to deal with his disability in the privacy of his home. | |
| Yesterday, state prosecutor Gerrie Nel accused the athlete of being a "deceitful and appalling witness" and claimed he had consistently tailored his version of events. He also called for his testimony, in which the athlete insisted that he fired accidentally, departing from his original claim that he fired in self-defence to protect himself from an intruder, to be rejected by the court. | Yesterday, state prosecutor Gerrie Nel accused the athlete of being a "deceitful and appalling witness" and claimed he had consistently tailored his version of events. He also called for his testimony, in which the athlete insisted that he fired accidentally, departing from his original claim that he fired in self-defence to protect himself from an intruder, to be rejected by the court. |
| The prosecution's case is that an enraged Pistorius grabbed his gun and intentionally shot girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp through a locked toilet door with intention to kill, knowing full well she was inside, following a heated argument in the early hours of Valentine's Day last year. | The prosecution's case is that an enraged Pistorius grabbed his gun and intentionally shot girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp through a locked toilet door with intention to kill, knowing full well she was inside, following a heated argument in the early hours of Valentine's Day last year. |
| Delivering his closing arguments, Mr Nel insisted that, even if the court accepts his testimony and takes into account his version of events, the athlete is still guilty of murder because he fired "without a cause....No one came out the door.... A reasonable man would not fire". | Delivering his closing arguments, Mr Nel insisted that, even if the court accepts his testimony and takes into account his version of events, the athlete is still guilty of murder because he fired "without a cause....No one came out the door.... A reasonable man would not fire". |
| “Even in the event of the court accepting the accused version, he cannot escape a verdict of murder,” Mr Nel said. | “Even in the event of the court accepting the accused version, he cannot escape a verdict of murder,” Mr Nel said. |
| “If you fire four shots into a small cubicle with black talon ammunition you see the possibility that you will kill somebody.” | “If you fire four shots into a small cubicle with black talon ammunition you see the possibility that you will kill somebody.” |
| Pistorius is accused of murdering the model and law graduate in his upscale home in Pretoria on Valentine's Day last year. He also faces three separate charges, including two counts of discharging firearms in public and possession of illegal ammunition. He denies all charges and claims he shot Ms Steenkamp by mistake, thinking there was a burglar. | Pistorius is accused of murdering the model and law graduate in his upscale home in Pretoria on Valentine's Day last year. He also faces three separate charges, including two counts of discharging firearms in public and possession of illegal ammunition. He denies all charges and claims he shot Ms Steenkamp by mistake, thinking there was a burglar. |
| Pistorius faces a mandatory life sentence which usually carries a minimum of 25 years in jail if found guilty of premeditated murder, though mitigation could reduce it in this case. If found guilty of the lesser charge of culpable homicide, he could face 15 years or a non-custodial sentence. Pistorius is currently free on bail. | Pistorius faces a mandatory life sentence which usually carries a minimum of 25 years in jail if found guilty of premeditated murder, though mitigation could reduce it in this case. If found guilty of the lesser charge of culpable homicide, he could face 15 years or a non-custodial sentence. Pistorius is currently free on bail. |
| South Africa does not have trial by jury, meaning the athlete's fate will be decided by judge Masipa, with the help of two assessors. | South Africa does not have trial by jury, meaning the athlete's fate will be decided by judge Masipa, with the help of two assessors. |