This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/19/indian-court-release-woman-hunger-strike-irom-sharmila

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Irom Sharmila, woman on hunger strike for 14 years, freed by Indian court Indian court orders release of woman on hunger strike for 14 years
(about 2 hours later)
An Indian court has ordered the release of a woman who has staged a 14-year hunger strike in protest at human rights abuses in the country's remote north-east, her lawyer has said. An Indian judge has ordered the release of human rights campaigner Irom Sharmila Chanu, who has been on hunger strike for nearly 14 years in protest at a law granting sweeping powers to security forces in the country's troubled north-east.
"The court has set her free," said Mani Khaidem of Irom Sharmila, who was arrested shortly after beginning her protest. Sharmila, 42, had appeared before a sessions court in the state capital Imphal to appeal against the decision of a lower court to put her on trial on a charge of attempted suicide. Under Indian law any attempt to take one's life is punishable by a year's imprisonment.
Sharmila, known as the Iron Lady of Manipur for her unwavering and non-violent protest, has refused food and water for almost 14 years to draw attention to abuses allegedly committed by the military. Popularly called the Iron Lady of Manipur, she began her hunger strike on 5 November 2000, three days after soldiers from the paramilitary Assam Rifles allegedly shot and killed 10 civilians.
She began her fast in November 2000 after witnessing the killing of 10 people by the army at a bus stop near her home in north-eastern Manipur, which is subject to the draconian Armed Forces Special Powers Act. She has become a figurehead for campaigners seeking repeal of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA), which was introduced in 1958 as a response to anti-government insurgencies in Indian-ruled Kashmir and other parts of the country's remote north-east. The controversial law allows troops to make arrests without warrants and even shoot suspected rebels without fear of prosecution. It also gives police sweeping powers of search and seizure.
She was arrested on charges of attempted suicide and was sent to a prison hospital where she was force-fed via a nasal drip several times a day. Since her last meal on 4 November 2000, Sharmila has been held in the security ward of Imphal hospital, where she is force-fed liquids through a pipe in her nose. She is kept in isolation and the authorities control her meetings with visitors. Once every year, the police go through the ritual of releasing her and then promptly re-arrest her on the same charge of attempted suicide.
Babloo Loitangbam, a human rights activist in the north-east who is close to Sharmila, said the court had accepted that the charge was not sustainable. But on Tuesday the Manipur sessions judge ruled that Sharmila had been wrongly charged with attempting to suicide, since her protest was "in support of a political demand through lawful means".
"There has been a consistent position where activists have been saying that Sharmila is not taking her life, she is making a political point which is to repeal the Armed Forces Special Powers Act," he told the NDTV network. "We argued that a hunger strike is not illegal or unconstitutional," said Irom Sharmila's lawyer, Khaidem Mani. "Even the British had not treated Mahatma Gandhi as a criminal when he fasted for a just cause."
Sharmila also faces similar charges in the capital, New Delhi, where she has staged a hunger strike in the past. "The judge upheld our stand that Irom Sharmila cannot be accused of a crime when she is only demanding the repeal of a draconian law," he told the Guardian.
The act, which covers large parts of north-eastern India and the restive state of Kashmir, gives Indian forces sweeping powers to search, enter property and shoot on sight and is seen by critics as a cover for human rights abuses. Human rights activist Babloo Loitangbam said the court had accepted that the charge of attempting suicide was not sustainable.
"Sharmila is not trying to take her life, she is trying to make a political point which is to repeal the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act," he told the NDTV network.
Human rights campaigners say the armed forces use the law to detain, torture and kill rebel suspects, but oppose reform of the legislation, saying it needs extraordinary powers to deal with insurgents.
Though Sharmila had been told about the judge's order, Mani was unable to meet her, he said. He plans to visit the hospital on Wednesday.
"I am confident she will be released on Wednesday, though the authorities may try to get a stay from a higher court and keep her inside," he said.
But other human rights activists in Manipur expressed doubt that the state government would release Sharmila. "She is held in very high regard in our society for her principled and steadfast struggle," said Bobby Laishangbam, a doctor in Imphal who assists victims of torture. "The sessions court has given a landmark judgment, but the Manipur government will definitely appeal."
Sharmila's brother Irom Singhajit also said he feared Sharmila faced rearrest. "Until and unless the AFSPA is repealed, she is going to continue her protest," Singhajit told AFP. "That is what I fear. Even if she is released, she will be arrested again within a day or two."
There is another legal complication. Sharmila is facing a second court case on the charge of attempted suicide, filed in a Delhi court in 2006. The authorities could refuse to release her, saying she is required to be produced in Delhi.
Amnesty International, which describes Sharmila as a prisoner of conscience, has demanded that all other charges against her be dropped and called for her immediate release.
"Irom Sharmila should never have been arrested in the first place," said Amnesty's Shailesh Rai. "Authorities must instead pay attention to the issues this remarkable activist is raising."
One human rights activist who met Sharmila this year said she is likely to continue campaigning after her release, but would not be reckless. "Since last year the jail authorities have relaxed the restrictions a bit, so she gets a few more visitors.
"What's remarkable is that after so many years of virtual solitary confinement and force-feeding, she has amazing clarity of thought. She was a small town girl, but in custody she has educated herself quite a bit, and displays huge will power."