This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/03/us-household-food-security-report

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
US household food insecurity remains at 2008 levels US household food insecurity remains at 2008 levels
(2 days later)
The number of American households with access to enough food for a healthy, active life has remained largely unchanged since it spiked during the 2008 economic recession, according to the US department of agriculture’s annual report on food security released on Wednesday.The number of American households with access to enough food for a healthy, active life has remained largely unchanged since it spiked during the 2008 economic recession, according to the US department of agriculture’s annual report on food security released on Wednesday.
Eighty-five point seven percent of US households had access to enough food for the entirety of 2013, the report found. The number of households that for at least part of the year did not have access to safe, available foods has hovered in the 14% range since 2008 when it jumped from the the 2007 figure of 11.1% because of the economic recession.Eighty-five point seven percent of US households had access to enough food for the entirety of 2013, the report found. The number of households that for at least part of the year did not have access to safe, available foods has hovered in the 14% range since 2008 when it jumped from the the 2007 figure of 11.1% because of the economic recession.
“At this rate it would take decades to get back to the rate before the recession,” Jim Weill, president of the Food Research and Action Center, told the Guardian. “So the progress that is being made is far, far too slow. The rate was far too high before the recession and we’re not moving very fast at getting back towards that rate.”“At this rate it would take decades to get back to the rate before the recession,” Jim Weill, president of the Food Research and Action Center, told the Guardian. “So the progress that is being made is far, far too slow. The rate was far too high before the recession and we’re not moving very fast at getting back towards that rate.”
Of the 14.3% of households that fall into the food insecurity category, 5.6% are in the lowest threshold of “very low food security.” This checks out to an estimated 6.8m households across the US that had to adjust their eating patterns because of lack of money or other resources to get food. A majority of that group said they had skipped meals or cut down the size of meals because they didn’t have enough money for food.Of the 14.3% of households that fall into the food insecurity category, 5.6% are in the lowest threshold of “very low food security.” This checks out to an estimated 6.8m households across the US that had to adjust their eating patterns because of lack of money or other resources to get food. A majority of that group said they had skipped meals or cut down the size of meals because they didn’t have enough money for food.
“The cure for all this isn’t a mystery,” said Weill. “We know how to do it: it’s a political problem, not a scientific problem. We know that the cure is better employment rates, higher wages and better income nutrition and support programs.”“The cure for all this isn’t a mystery,” said Weill. “We know how to do it: it’s a political problem, not a scientific problem. We know that the cure is better employment rates, higher wages and better income nutrition and support programs.”
For 75% of the food insecure group, the conditions were experienced in three or more months of the year. Of the households with children, 19.5% were food insecure, with 9.9% of households having food insecure adults and children.For 75% of the food insecure group, the conditions were experienced in three or more months of the year. Of the households with children, 19.5% were food insecure, with 9.9% of households having food insecure adults and children.
Dr David Holben, acting associate dean at Ohio University’s college of health and sciences and professions, said food insecurity causes illness, psychological issues and social disturbances. Dr David Holben, professor of nutrition at Ohio University, said food insecurity causes illness, psychological issues and social disturbances.
“You probably have a neighbor that you don’t realize doesn’t have access to food and there are probably some negative things happening because of that,” said Holben.“You probably have a neighbor that you don’t realize doesn’t have access to food and there are probably some negative things happening because of that,” said Holben.
He said federal and non-federal food and nutrition programs are needed to address this disparity. As are community-based actions like increasing job and economic security and helping individuals and households to be self-sufficient.He said federal and non-federal food and nutrition programs are needed to address this disparity. As are community-based actions like increasing job and economic security and helping individuals and households to be self-sufficient.
Data was collected in a survey of 42,147 US households representative of the US. Respondents were asked questions about the accuracy of statements such as: “The food that we bought just didn’t last and we didn’t have money to get more” and “We couldn’t afford to eat balanced meals.” Homeless families and individuals are not included in this data.Data was collected in a survey of 42,147 US households representative of the US. Respondents were asked questions about the accuracy of statements such as: “The food that we bought just didn’t last and we didn’t have money to get more” and “We couldn’t afford to eat balanced meals.” Homeless families and individuals are not included in this data.
Rates of food insecurity were higher than the national average in households headed by single adults, black and hispanic people. Arkansas had the highest prevalence of food insecurity at 21.2%, while North Dakota, had the lowest at 8.7%.Rates of food insecurity were higher than the national average in households headed by single adults, black and hispanic people. Arkansas had the highest prevalence of food insecurity at 21.2%, while North Dakota, had the lowest at 8.7%.
About 62% of food insecure homes said they received government assistance from one or more of the three largest federal assistance programs including Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap) food stamps, free or reduced-price school lunches for students and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC).About 62% of food insecure homes said they received government assistance from one or more of the three largest federal assistance programs including Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap) food stamps, free or reduced-price school lunches for students and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC).