This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/12/world/africa/oscar-pistorius-south-africa-verdict.html
The article has changed 14 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 9 | Version 10 |
|---|---|
| Oscar Pistorius Not Guilty of Murder; Court Adjourns With Lesser Charge Pending | Oscar Pistorius Not Guilty of Murder; Court Adjourns With Lesser Charge Pending |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| PRETORIA, South Africa — After clearing the Paralympic athlete Oscar Pistorius of the gravest charges against him, the judge in his murder trial abruptly suspended the proceedings on Thursday, leaving one charge of unlawful homicide pending until a further court session on Friday. | PRETORIA, South Africa — After clearing the Paralympic athlete Oscar Pistorius of the gravest charges against him, the judge in his murder trial abruptly suspended the proceedings on Thursday, leaving one charge of unlawful homicide pending until a further court session on Friday. |
| “We’ll have to stop here and resume tomorrow morning,” Judge Thokozile Matilda Masipa said less than half an hour after hearings resumed following a lunch break. She did not explain the adjournment. | “We’ll have to stop here and resume tomorrow morning,” Judge Thokozile Matilda Masipa said less than half an hour after hearings resumed following a lunch break. She did not explain the adjournment. |
| Earlier, in three hours of detailed appraisal of a trial that has transfixed many around the world and that has been compared to the O.J. Simpson case in the United States, the judge cleared Mr. Pistorius of two charges — premeditated murder, which carries a minimum mandatory term of 25 years, and a lesser charge of homicide known simply as “murder.” | Earlier, in three hours of detailed appraisal of a trial that has transfixed many around the world and that has been compared to the O.J. Simpson case in the United States, the judge cleared Mr. Pistorius of two charges — premeditated murder, which carries a minimum mandatory term of 25 years, and a lesser charge of homicide known simply as “murder.” |
| Judge Masipa then turned to the lesser charge of culpable homicide, which is comparable to involuntary manslaughter. | Judge Masipa then turned to the lesser charge of culpable homicide, which is comparable to involuntary manslaughter. |
| Without pronouncing a verdict, she said that Mr. Pistorius had failed three tests to escape culpable homicide charges. One of the tests was what a “reasonable” person would have done under the same circumstances. | |
| Since his trial opened in March, Mr. Pistorius, 27, a double amputee who has also challenged able-bodied runners, has faced accusations by the prosecution that he deliberately took the life of his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp, 29, when he fired into a locked toilet cubicle at his villa in the South African capital in the pre-dawn hours of Feb. 14, 2013. Mr. Pistorius has insisted that he killed her by mistake, believing an intruder had entered his home. | Since his trial opened in March, Mr. Pistorius, 27, a double amputee who has also challenged able-bodied runners, has faced accusations by the prosecution that he deliberately took the life of his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp, 29, when he fired into a locked toilet cubicle at his villa in the South African capital in the pre-dawn hours of Feb. 14, 2013. Mr. Pistorius has insisted that he killed her by mistake, believing an intruder had entered his home. |
| Pointedly, the judge compared Mr. Pistorius’s reaction and behavior to that of the majority of people in South Africa who live under daily threat of crime. “Many people in this country have experienced crime, but they have not resorted to sleeping with a firearm under their pillow,” she said. | Pointedly, the judge compared Mr. Pistorius’s reaction and behavior to that of the majority of people in South Africa who live under daily threat of crime. “Many people in this country have experienced crime, but they have not resorted to sleeping with a firearm under their pillow,” she said. |
| Mr. Pistorius has said he became alarmed when he heard what he thought was the sound of a bathroom window being opened at his villa in a gated complex with round-the-clock guards. “All the accused had to do was to pick up his cellphone and call security or the police,” the judge said, finding that Mr. Pistorius “acted too hastily,” “used excessive force” and had been negligent in his conduct. | Mr. Pistorius has said he became alarmed when he heard what he thought was the sound of a bathroom window being opened at his villa in a gated complex with round-the-clock guards. “All the accused had to do was to pick up his cellphone and call security or the police,” the judge said, finding that Mr. Pistorius “acted too hastily,” “used excessive force” and had been negligent in his conduct. |
| At that point, with many observers in the courtroom forecasting that she was about to deliver her judgment, she adjourned the hearing until Friday. | |
| Earlier, calmly and coolly taking up piece after piece of evidence, dismissing some, discounting others, offering practical interpretations of still more, Judge Masipa said that although Mr. Pistorius made a poor and evasive witness, she found large parts of his story credible. Most significantly, she said it seemed — or at least that the prosecution had been unable to prove otherwise — that when he shot and killed Ms. Steenkamp, he genuinely believed that intruders had broken into his home and were hiding in the bathroom at the time. | Earlier, calmly and coolly taking up piece after piece of evidence, dismissing some, discounting others, offering practical interpretations of still more, Judge Masipa said that although Mr. Pistorius made a poor and evasive witness, she found large parts of his story credible. Most significantly, she said it seemed — or at least that the prosecution had been unable to prove otherwise — that when he shot and killed Ms. Steenkamp, he genuinely believed that intruders had broken into his home and were hiding in the bathroom at the time. |
| Sitting in a wooden dock in a dark suit, white shirt and black tie, Mr. Pistorius slumped forward and sobbed as the judge cleared him of the two murder charges. | Sitting in a wooden dock in a dark suit, white shirt and black tie, Mr. Pistorius slumped forward and sobbed as the judge cleared him of the two murder charges. |
| There are no jury trials in South Africa, so it has been left to Judge Masipa, with the help of two aides, to render the verdict on her own. According to normal procedures in the country, the judgment includes a summation of the facts, an analysis of the evidence, and then the announcement of the verdict, charge after charge. | There are no jury trials in South Africa, so it has been left to Judge Masipa, with the help of two aides, to render the verdict on her own. According to normal procedures in the country, the judgment includes a summation of the facts, an analysis of the evidence, and then the announcement of the verdict, charge after charge. |
| Judge Masipa also dismissed out of hand large portions of the prosecution’s evidence, in particular the testimony of neighbors who said they had heard the sounds of a man and woman arguing in Mr. Pistorius’s house before the shots were fired. And she said that prosecution evidence culled from WhatsApp text messages and meant to demonstrate that Mr. Pistorius and Ms. Steenkamp’s relationship was “on the rocks,” as she put it, could not be considered relevant. Nor, she said, could seemingly contradictory text-message evidence from the defense meant to show that the couple had a loving relationship be helpful in reaching a verdict. | Judge Masipa also dismissed out of hand large portions of the prosecution’s evidence, in particular the testimony of neighbors who said they had heard the sounds of a man and woman arguing in Mr. Pistorius’s house before the shots were fired. And she said that prosecution evidence culled from WhatsApp text messages and meant to demonstrate that Mr. Pistorius and Ms. Steenkamp’s relationship was “on the rocks,” as she put it, could not be considered relevant. Nor, she said, could seemingly contradictory text-message evidence from the defense meant to show that the couple had a loving relationship be helpful in reaching a verdict. |
| “In my view, none of this evidence, from the state or defense, proves anything, she said. “Normal relationships are dynamic and unpredictable sometimes.” | “In my view, none of this evidence, from the state or defense, proves anything, she said. “Normal relationships are dynamic and unpredictable sometimes.” |
| In being acquitted of the two harshest charges against him Mr. Pistorius has possibly escaped a lengthy prison sentence. But culpable homicide, which is defined as the negligent killing of another person and is roughly comparable to involuntary manslaughter, can carry a wide range of sentences, at the discretion of the judge, from no jail time to more than 15 years incarceration. | In being acquitted of the two harshest charges against him Mr. Pistorius has possibly escaped a lengthy prison sentence. But culpable homicide, which is defined as the negligent killing of another person and is roughly comparable to involuntary manslaughter, can carry a wide range of sentences, at the discretion of the judge, from no jail time to more than 15 years incarceration. |
| The judge’s were a huge setback for the prosecutor, Gerrie Nel, who had called for Mr. Pistorius to be convicted of murder and whose pugnacious courtroom manner earned him the nickname the Pit Bull. | |
| In his version of the shooting, Mr. Pistorius has described walking on the stumps of his legs in a darkened passageway, with a handgun thrust out before him, before he opened fire on a locked toilet door. When he broke down the door with a cricket bat, he said, he discovered the bloodstained body of Ms. Steenkamp. | In his version of the shooting, Mr. Pistorius has described walking on the stumps of his legs in a darkened passageway, with a handgun thrust out before him, before he opened fire on a locked toilet door. When he broke down the door with a cricket bat, he said, he discovered the bloodstained body of Ms. Steenkamp. |
| “Before I knew it, I had fired four shots at the door,” Judge Masipa quoted Mr. Pistorius as saying, as she listed the various ways he described the shooting during the trial. At times, he said he shot “in the belief that the intruders were coming out” to attack him. At other moments, he said “he never intended to shoot anyone” and had not fired purposefully at the door, the judge said. Part of Mr. Pistorius’s evidence, she said, was “inconsistent with someone who shot without thinking.” | “Before I knew it, I had fired four shots at the door,” Judge Masipa quoted Mr. Pistorius as saying, as she listed the various ways he described the shooting during the trial. At times, he said he shot “in the belief that the intruders were coming out” to attack him. At other moments, he said “he never intended to shoot anyone” and had not fired purposefully at the door, the judge said. Part of Mr. Pistorius’s evidence, she said, was “inconsistent with someone who shot without thinking.” |
| Ms. Steenkamp, Judge Masipa added, “was killed under very peculiar circumstances,” but “what is not conjecture is that the accused armed himself with a loaded firearm.” | Ms. Steenkamp, Judge Masipa added, “was killed under very peculiar circumstances,” but “what is not conjecture is that the accused armed himself with a loaded firearm.” |
| Nonetheless, the judge ruled, the prosecution’s evidence to support a charge of premeditated murder was “purely circumstantial.” | Nonetheless, the judge ruled, the prosecution’s evidence to support a charge of premeditated murder was “purely circumstantial.” |
| “The state clearly has not proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty of premeditated murder,” she said. “There are not enough facts.” | “The state clearly has not proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty of premeditated murder,” she said. “There are not enough facts.” |
| Much of the trial, with 41 days of testimony since it opened in March, has revolved around Mr. Pistorius’s state of mind and intentions when he opened fire. During cross-examination in April, Mr. Pistorius sobbed, wailed and retched as he recalled the events surrounding Ms. Steenkamp’s death. | Much of the trial, with 41 days of testimony since it opened in March, has revolved around Mr. Pistorius’s state of mind and intentions when he opened fire. During cross-examination in April, Mr. Pistorius sobbed, wailed and retched as he recalled the events surrounding Ms. Steenkamp’s death. |
| While she accepted that Mr. Pistorius “would feel vulnerable” because of his disability,” the judge said, he had been “a very poor witness” and had been evasive and “lost his composure” under cross-examination. | While she accepted that Mr. Pistorius “would feel vulnerable” because of his disability,” the judge said, he had been “a very poor witness” and had been evasive and “lost his composure” under cross-examination. |
| Until the killing, Mr. Pistorius, who had challenged able-bodied runners only months earlier at the London Olympics in 2012, seemed to be reveling in a glittery career of sporting success and celebrity acclaim. | Until the killing, Mr. Pistorius, who had challenged able-bodied runners only months earlier at the London Olympics in 2012, seemed to be reveling in a glittery career of sporting success and celebrity acclaim. |
| As the trial unfolded, the defense and the prosecution offered Jekyll-and-Hyde depictions of Mr. Pistorius’s character. | As the trial unfolded, the defense and the prosecution offered Jekyll-and-Hyde depictions of Mr. Pistorius’s character. |
| The prosecutor, Mr. Nel, described him as trigger-happy, mendacious, narcissistic and prone to rage. By contrast, the lead defense lawyer, Barry Roux, sought to present him as anxious, vulnerable and fearful of South Africa’s violent crime, laboring under the psychological burden of growing up since the age of 11 months with both legs amputated below the knee. | The prosecutor, Mr. Nel, described him as trigger-happy, mendacious, narcissistic and prone to rage. By contrast, the lead defense lawyer, Barry Roux, sought to present him as anxious, vulnerable and fearful of South Africa’s violent crime, laboring under the psychological burden of growing up since the age of 11 months with both legs amputated below the knee. |
| In part, the trial has been held up as evidence of a dramatic reversal of South Africa’s white-dominated apartheid-era legal system. In 1998, four years after South Africa’s first democratic election, Judge Masipa, who is 66 today, became only the second black female judge to be appointed to the High Court. Born in a poor township, she had been a social worker and newspaper journalist before studying law at the height of the apartheid era. Now, under South African judicial protocols, lawyers and witnesses are obliged to address her with the honorific “My Lady.” | In part, the trial has been held up as evidence of a dramatic reversal of South Africa’s white-dominated apartheid-era legal system. In 1998, four years after South Africa’s first democratic election, Judge Masipa, who is 66 today, became only the second black female judge to be appointed to the High Court. Born in a poor township, she had been a social worker and newspaper journalist before studying law at the height of the apartheid era. Now, under South African judicial protocols, lawyers and witnesses are obliged to address her with the honorific “My Lady.” |
| But the trial has also highlighted the country’s continued racial preoccupations and its high levels of crime against women. In other cases, Judge Masipa has handed down tough sentences in cases of rape and violence against women. | But the trial has also highlighted the country’s continued racial preoccupations and its high levels of crime against women. In other cases, Judge Masipa has handed down tough sentences in cases of rape and violence against women. |
| Mr. Pistorius also faces three counts relating to firearms offenses. | Mr. Pistorius also faces three counts relating to firearms offenses. |