This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-29162620
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Oscar Pistorius trial: Why culpable homicide, not murder | |
(about 17 hours later) | |
Judge Thokozile Masipa has found Olympic athlete Oscar Pistorius guilty of culpable homicide, after he shot his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp dead on Valentines' Day 2013. | |
But she acquitted him of two charges of murder. | |
Here is a guide to the judge's reasoning: | Here is a guide to the judge's reasoning: |
Premeditated murder | Premeditated murder |
The state argued that Mr Pistorius had had an argument with Ms Steenkamp, after which he deliberately shot her dead. | The state argued that Mr Pistorius had had an argument with Ms Steenkamp, after which he deliberately shot her dead. |
The judge ruled this had not been proved, as there was only circumstantial evidence of an argument - uncorroborated witnesses' statements. | The judge ruled this had not been proved, as there was only circumstantial evidence of an argument - uncorroborated witnesses' statements. |
She also dismissed witnesses who said they had heard Ms Steenkamp scream before the shots were fired, or before the final shot. | She also dismissed witnesses who said they had heard Ms Steenkamp scream before the shots were fired, or before the final shot. |
"The state has not proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty of premeditated murder," she said. "There are just not enough facts to support such a finding." | "The state has not proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty of premeditated murder," she said. "There are just not enough facts to support such a finding." |
The judge found that he consistently said he had fired in the belief there was an intruder and she had no reason to disbelieve him. | The judge found that he consistently said he had fired in the belief there was an intruder and she had no reason to disbelieve him. |
Common-law murder | Common-law murder |
She also ruled this out, saying: "The accused had the intention to shoot at the person behind the door, not to kill." | She also ruled this out, saying: "The accused had the intention to shoot at the person behind the door, not to kill." |
He could also have been convicted of a lesser charge of murder, if he had unlawfully intended to kill in the heat of the moment but without "malice aforethought". | He could also have been convicted of a lesser charge of murder, if he had unlawfully intended to kill in the heat of the moment but without "malice aforethought". |
This could have covered either shooting at the door intending to kill, or knowing someone might be killed and still firing a gun. | This could have covered either shooting at the door intending to kill, or knowing someone might be killed and still firing a gun. |
This would also apply if he had intended to kill an intruder but had instead killed his girlfriend. | This would also apply if he had intended to kill an intruder but had instead killed his girlfriend. |
But judge Masipa also dismissed this, saying: "The evidence failed to prove the accused had intention." | But judge Masipa also dismissed this, saying: "The evidence failed to prove the accused had intention." |
"Clearly he did not objectively foresee this as a possibility that he would kill the person behind the door." | "Clearly he did not objectively foresee this as a possibility that he would kill the person behind the door." |
Culpable homicide (manslaughter) | Culpable homicide (manslaughter) |
This means there was no intention to kill but the actions were negligent and not in keeping with a reasonable person. | This means there was no intention to kill but the actions were negligent and not in keeping with a reasonable person. |
Judge Masipa said that Mr Pistorius had ample time to call for help, rather than going to confront a perceived intruder with a loaded gun. | |
"The accused had reasonable time to reflect, to think and conduct himself reasonably," she said. | |
"The accused knew that there was a person behind the door, he chose to use a firearm which was a lethal weapon, was competent in the use of firearms as he had received training." | |
The judge rejected the defence arguments that Mr Pistorius is more likely to confront danger because of his disability - both his legs have been amputated. | |
"Vulnerability is not unique - There are many people in this country without any form of security at all," she said. | "Vulnerability is not unique - There are many people in this country without any form of security at all," she said. |
She summed up by saying: "The accused acted too hastily and used excessive force." | She summed up by saying: "The accused acted too hastily and used excessive force." |
"It is clear that his conduct was negligent." | "It is clear that his conduct was negligent." |
The sentence for culpable homicide is a maximum of 15 years in jail. Legal experts say seven to 10 years is more likely. | The sentence for culpable homicide is a maximum of 15 years in jail. Legal experts say seven to 10 years is more likely. |
Other charges | Other charges |
Mr Pistorius was also convicted of illegally discharging a firearm in a restaurant - he could receive a jail term on this charge alone. | |
He was acquitted of illegally firing a gun through a car sunroof, after the judge said the witnesses were unreliable. | |
He was also acquitted of illegal possession of ammunition. | |
Sentencing is likely to be in the next week or so. |