This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/24/romania-trial-prison-camp-alexandru-visinescu
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Romania confronts communist past in trial of prison camp chief | Romania confronts communist past in trial of prison camp chief |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| The hearing only lasted an hour. The defendant was a frail old man in a hat. The atmosphere was subdued, the legal procedure perfunctory. | The hearing only lasted an hour. The defendant was a frail old man in a hat. The atmosphere was subdued, the legal procedure perfunctory. |
| But in a packed courtroom in Bucharest, Romania finally took steps on Wednesday to come to terms with the brutality of its communist past. Twenty-five years after the collapse of the Ceausescu regime, the country for the first time initiated a trial of an individual accused of crimes committed during the 40 years of communist rule. | But in a packed courtroom in Bucharest, Romania finally took steps on Wednesday to come to terms with the brutality of its communist past. Twenty-five years after the collapse of the Ceausescu regime, the country for the first time initiated a trial of an individual accused of crimes committed during the 40 years of communist rule. |
| Alexandru Visinescu, 89, faces charges of crimes against humanity for his role as the commander of the notorious Ramnicu Sarat prison for political prisoners. | Alexandru Visinescu, 89, faces charges of crimes against humanity for his role as the commander of the notorious Ramnicu Sarat prison for political prisoners. |
| Sitting quietly in a three-piece suit in the second row of the courtroom, he did not look like a man who was making history. | Sitting quietly in a three-piece suit in the second row of the courtroom, he did not look like a man who was making history. |
| Visinescu, who was commander at Ramnicu Sarat prison between 1956 and 1963, is said to have overseen an “extermination regime” and is accused of torture and having an involvement in the deaths of 12 political prisoners. He denies the charges. | Visinescu, who was commander at Ramnicu Sarat prison between 1956 and 1963, is said to have overseen an “extermination regime” and is accused of torture and having an involvement in the deaths of 12 political prisoners. He denies the charges. |
| Nicoleta Eremia, the widow of a former political prisoner, asked the court for €100,000 (£78,000) in moral and financial damages related to her husband, a general imprisoned for writing a book critical of the communist leadership. | |
| Her husband, who spent three years in Ramnicu Sarat prison and who died in 2004 aged 90, “left this world lacking peace” because of what had happened to him in prison, Eremia told the Guardian after court had adjourned for the day. | Her husband, who spent three years in Ramnicu Sarat prison and who died in 2004 aged 90, “left this world lacking peace” because of what had happened to him in prison, Eremia told the Guardian after court had adjourned for the day. |
| “My husband ended up weighing just 30 kilograms (4st 10lb) when he got out of prison. I have records showing how much hard detention he was made to do.” | |
| Visinescu, who declined to comment before the trial began, sat quietly throughout and was not called to take the stand. After clarifying the parties involved and examining documentation, the judge adjourned the case until 22 October. | Visinescu, who declined to comment before the trial began, sat quietly throughout and was not called to take the stand. After clarifying the parties involved and examining documentation, the judge adjourned the case until 22 October. |
| The case lifts the lid on the vast secret police apparatus that kept tabs on Romanians for signs of dissidence throughout the communist era from 1947-1989. | |
| For those incarcerated as a political prisoner, life was harsh; of the estimated 617,000 people locked up as opponents of the state, 120,000 are thought to have died behind bars. | For those incarcerated as a political prisoner, life was harsh; of the estimated 617,000 people locked up as opponents of the state, 120,000 are thought to have died behind bars. |
| Yet, aside from Ceausescu, his wife Elena and a few aides, communist-era officials were not brought to justice and were allowed to either retire and live in peace or else enrich themselves through contacts built up during the old regime. | |
| “The sentiment was that Nicolae Ceausescu was gone, so was his wife (they were executed on Christmas Day 1989). They acted as scapegoats for officials and for the party as a whole,” said Adrian Cioroianu, dean of history at the University of Bucharest. “In the 1990s we as a nation had other priorities,” he added. | “The sentiment was that Nicolae Ceausescu was gone, so was his wife (they were executed on Christmas Day 1989). They acted as scapegoats for officials and for the party as a whole,” said Adrian Cioroianu, dean of history at the University of Bucharest. “In the 1990s we as a nation had other priorities,” he added. |
| There is a sense now that Romania is ready to deal with some of the darker legacies of its past. | There is a sense now that Romania is ready to deal with some of the darker legacies of its past. |
| “It’s been 25 years, it’s time to see justice,” said Cosmin Budeanca, director general of the Institute for the Investigation of Communist Crimes and the Memory of the Romanian Exile (IICCMER), an organisation set up in 2006 by the Romanian government to try to address communist-era crimes. | “It’s been 25 years, it’s time to see justice,” said Cosmin Budeanca, director general of the Institute for the Investigation of Communist Crimes and the Memory of the Romanian Exile (IICCMER), an organisation set up in 2006 by the Romanian government to try to address communist-era crimes. |
| After an earlier failure by the IICCMER to convince state prosecutors to move forward with an initial list of 210 former officials, in July 2013 the organisation submitted a revised list of 35 individuals. Of those, four have been charged, according to Budeanca, with Visinescu the first to reach trial. Another, Ion Ficior, a one-time labour camp commander, is likely to be next. However, before that happens much depends on the outcome of the Visinescu case. | |
| “Visinescu is very old, so it is unlikely he will actually be sentenced to prison time, but if convicted there would still be a moral justice, which is important for society, for the former prisoners and for their children and grandchildren,” said Budeanca. | “Visinescu is very old, so it is unlikely he will actually be sentenced to prison time, but if convicted there would still be a moral justice, which is important for society, for the former prisoners and for their children and grandchildren,” said Budeanca. |
| In a sign that it was willing to address past crimes, in 2012 Romania removed the statute of limitations for crimes against humanity, allowing for the prosecution of those whose crimes went back more than 40 years. | |
| “The communist regime in Romania was among the worst in eastern Europe,” says Laura Ștefan, an anti-corruption expert and a former director in the Romanian ministry of justice. “Changing the statute of limitation was the only way to deal with cases in a judicial manner, rather than just in the history books.” | |
| Some have suggested that by going after the likes of Visinescu, rather than the more senior officials who were making the bigger decisions, Romania is once again taking the easy option, but others disagree. | |
| “This guy meant a lot to the people who went through that place. He wasn’t just a no-rank person who carried water; he was a decision-maker,” said Ștefan. | “This guy meant a lot to the people who went through that place. He wasn’t just a no-rank person who carried water; he was a decision-maker,” said Ștefan. |
| “There are a lot of testimonies against Visinescu,” added Ana Blandiana, a poet, former dissident and the president of a foundation that runs a memorial museum in Sighet prison, another of the former communist-era prisons. | “There are a lot of testimonies against Visinescu,” added Ana Blandiana, a poet, former dissident and the president of a foundation that runs a memorial museum in Sighet prison, another of the former communist-era prisons. |
| “These people live comfortably, they have state pensions and housing, which makes it not just a historical crime but one that still has an impact today,” she said. | “These people live comfortably, they have state pensions and housing, which makes it not just a historical crime but one that still has an impact today,” she said. |
| “If the trial had happened in 1991-92 the impact on society would have been much bigger,” said Cioroianu, but he added that it was still a very important signal. | “If the trial had happened in 1991-92 the impact on society would have been much bigger,” said Cioroianu, but he added that it was still a very important signal. |
| “In my faculty, the students must understand, they must see, that something happened in the 1950s or 60s and that it wasn’t forgotten – that justice was done, while those who were involved must understand that no one is above the law.” | “In my faculty, the students must understand, they must see, that something happened in the 1950s or 60s and that it wasn’t forgotten – that justice was done, while those who were involved must understand that no one is above the law.” |
| Visinescu has always maintained that he simply followed orders. | Visinescu has always maintained that he simply followed orders. |
| Passing through the crowds of journalists and television cameras on his way out of court, Visinescu was inundated with questions. Asked how he felt about the people who were bringing these charges against him, he said: “They can do what they want,” and refused to answer further questions. |