This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/sierra-nevada-corp-protests-nasa-space-contract/2014/09/27/bc5d55d2-4650-11e4-b437-1a7368204804_story.html?wprss=rss_homepage
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Sierra Nevada Corp. protests NASA space contract | Sierra Nevada Corp. protests NASA space contract |
| (about 1 hour later) | |
| Sierra Nevada Corp. filed a protest of a major NASA contract late Friday, saying its proposal to ferry astronauts to the International Space Station would save money and should be given further consideration. | Sierra Nevada Corp. filed a protest of a major NASA contract late Friday, saying its proposal to ferry astronauts to the International Space Station would save money and should be given further consideration. |
| Earlier this month, NASA awarded contracts to Boeing and SpaceX under what is called the “commercial crew” program, which would allow the United States, for the first time since the space shuttle was retired three years ago, to launch astronauts into space from U.S. soil. | Earlier this month, NASA awarded contracts to Boeing and SpaceX under what is called the “commercial crew” program, which would allow the United States, for the first time since the space shuttle was retired three years ago, to launch astronauts into space from U.S. soil. |
| The contract would end the U.S.’s reliance on Russia, which currently charges more than $70 million a seat for trips aboard its Soyuz space craft to the space station. | |
| Boeing’s contract is worth up to $4.2 billion; SpaceX, which said it could perform the work for far less, was awarded a valued at $2.6 billion. | |
| In announcing its protest in a statement, Sierra Nevada noted that it had “never filed a legal challenge to a government contract award” in its 51-year history. | In announcing its protest in a statement, Sierra Nevada noted that it had “never filed a legal challenge to a government contract award” in its 51-year history. |
| But the Nevada-based company said that it was compelled to file a protest with the Government Accountability Office because of “serious questions and inconsistencies in the source selection process.” Sierra Nevada’s proposal was the second-lowest-priced, the company said, while it “achieved mission suitability scores comparable to the other two proposals.” | |
| The award by NASA would mean “the U.S. government would spend up to $900 million more at the publicly announced contracted level for a space program equivalent to the program that [Sierra Nevada] proposed,” the statement said. | |
| Unlike SpaceX and Boeing, which would use capsules to dock to the space station, Sierra Nevada proposes using a reusable miniature shuttle called the Dream Chaser. | Unlike SpaceX and Boeing, which would use capsules to dock to the space station, Sierra Nevada proposes using a reusable miniature shuttle called the Dream Chaser. |
| The so-called “space plane” “provides a wider range of capabilities and value,” the statement said. | The so-called “space plane” “provides a wider range of capabilities and value,” the statement said. |
| A NASA spokeswoman declined to comment. |