This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-29895568

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Tower Hamlets Council criticised over grants by government auditors Tower Hamlets Council criticised over grants by government auditors
(35 minutes later)
A report into allegations of fraud at Tower Hamlets Council has criticised the authority in its awarding of grants and the selling of property.A report into allegations of fraud at Tower Hamlets Council has criticised the authority in its awarding of grants and the selling of property.
Auditors investigated allegations of "poor financial management".Auditors investigated allegations of "poor financial management".
They found a lack of transparency when issuing grants and that on some occasions the council had awarded money to groups which had not applied.They found a lack of transparency when issuing grants and that on some occasions the council had awarded money to groups which had not applied.
The council said it "regretted" flaws in its processes but added there was "no evidence of criminality or fraud".The council said it "regretted" flaws in its processes but added there was "no evidence of criminality or fraud".
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) was instructed to investigate "allegations about governance failures, poor financial management and possible fraud" by Communities Secretary Eric Pickles.PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) was instructed to investigate "allegations about governance failures, poor financial management and possible fraud" by Communities Secretary Eric Pickles.
It follows allegations in a BBC Panorama investigation that directly-elected mayor Lutfur Rahman diverted charity money for political support. It follows allegations in a BBC Panorama investigation that directly-elected Labour mayor Lutfur Rahman diverted charity money for political support.
Mr Rahman has denied all allegations of electoral malpractice.Mr Rahman has denied all allegations of electoral malpractice.
'Contract race'
The report highlighted the "954 Fund" of £954,000 in surplus monies identified in 2012.
It was found to have "no open application process at all, with monies targeted at member discretion" and in some cases grants were awarded to organisations ruled ineligible.
It also found that a proposal to award money to lunch clubs for Jewish, Sikh and Hindu communities saw £99,212 awarded to Bangladeshi or Somali groups, none of which had applied for the money
The report also highlights the controversial sale of Poplar Town Hall to Dreamstar Ltd in 2011.
The authority accepted a late, lower bid from the company, which was found to have an "association with the Mayor", despite being advised to accept an offer from another bidder.
PWC said: "The acceptance of a late bid in whatever form created the possibility of manipulation, which could have been avoided or significantly reduced, either by excluding the late bid... or by delaying the opening of all bids."
'Act proportionately'
Dreamstar won the contract race but did not have the finances available to purchase the lease within the four-week timeframe.
It also asked for and received the council's consent to change the contract to sub-let and to change the use of the listed property.
This was granted at the discretion of the planning officer, rather than referred to the development planning committee, as would be expected.
PWC said the actions showed the "existing governance arrangements have weaknesses".
In a statement the council said: "In our view there is no evidence that these flaws of process are 'regular or endemic' meaning that there is no failure to comply with our best value duty.
"We await the government's reaction to the report but we urge the Secretary of State to act proportionately."