This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/13/world/europe/ukraine-russia-military-border-nato.html

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Russian Troops Crossing Into Ukraine, NATO Says Russian Troops Crossing Into Ukraine, NATO Says
(about 4 hours later)
KIEV, Ukraine — Tanks and other military vehicles towing heavy weapons pouring over the border from Russia into eastern Ukraine. Nightly artillery battles in the region’s biggest city, Donetsk, and reports of fighting around another regional capital. KIEV, Ukraine — Tanks and other military vehicles towing heavy weapons pouring over the border from Russia into eastern Ukraine. Nightly artillery battles in the region’s biggest city, Donetsk, and reports of fighting around another regional capital.
And now, sightings of the “green men,” professional soldiers in green uniforms without insignia, the same type of forces that carried out the invasion of Crimea in the spring.And now, sightings of the “green men,” professional soldiers in green uniforms without insignia, the same type of forces that carried out the invasion of Crimea in the spring.
A senior NATO official confirmed on Wednesday what Ukrainian military officials and monitors from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe have been saying for days now: Russian troops and military equipment are crossing the border into Ukraine, seemingly preparing for renewed military action, though what exactly remains unclear.A senior NATO official confirmed on Wednesday what Ukrainian military officials and monitors from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe have been saying for days now: Russian troops and military equipment are crossing the border into Ukraine, seemingly preparing for renewed military action, though what exactly remains unclear.
The assertion drew stern and dismissive denials from Moscow, which for months has denied any military intervention in eastern Ukraine, though it has acknowledged publicly that Russian "volunteers" have crossed into Ukraine to support the separatists. The assertion drew stern and dismissive denials from Moscow, which for months has denied any military intervention in eastern Ukraine, though it has acknowledged publicly that Russian “volunteers” have crossed into Ukraine to support the pro-Russia separatists.
In light of the recent developments, Western officials finally seemed ready to acknowledge that a cease-fire agreement signed in September had fallen apart, and that the threat to peace in Europe had returned in a possibly more virulent form.In light of the recent developments, Western officials finally seemed ready to acknowledge that a cease-fire agreement signed in September had fallen apart, and that the threat to peace in Europe had returned in a possibly more virulent form.
The official, Gen. Philip Breedlove, the Supreme Allied Commander Europe of NATO said that it “is concerned about convoys of trucks taking artillery and supplies into east Ukraine from Russia.” He said there were increased numbers of Russian forces in east Ukraine, training militants including in the use of sophisticated weaponry. The official, Gen. Philip M. Breedlove, NATO’s top military commander, said it was “concerned about convoys of trucks taking artillery and supplies into east Ukraine from Russia.” He said there were increased numbers of Russian forces in eastern Ukraine, training militants including in the use of sophisticated weaponry.
“Across the last two days we have seen the same thing that O.S.C.E. is reporting,” General Breedlove said at a news conference in Sofia, Bulgaria. “We have seen columns of Russian equipment, primarily Russian tanks, Russian artillery, Russian air defense systems and Russian combat troops entering into Ukraine.” “Across the last two days we have seen the same thing that O.S.C.E. is reporting,” General Breedlove said at a news conference in Sofia, Bulgaria. “We have seen columns of Russian equipment, primarily Russian tanks, Russian artillery, Russian air defense systems and Russian combat troops, entering into Ukraine.”
The full scope of the Russian incursion was not clear, he said. The full scope of the Russian incursion is not clear, he said, though the convoys seemed to be heading east toward Donetsk, an O.S.C.E. spokesman, Michael Bociurkiw, said Wednesday. “We we have reported since Saturday are three separate sightings of large military convoys 126 vehicles in total in areas controlled by armed rebel groups in Donetsk,” he added.
“We do not have a good picture at this time of how many,” he said. “We agree that there are multiple columns that we have seen; we agree with the OSCE reports. And as to their intent: I’m not sure.” He added, “It is our first guess that these forces will go in to make this a more contiguous, more whole and capable pocket of land in order to then hold onto it long-term.” General Breedlove said NATO was unsure about their intent. “It is our first guess that these forces will go in to make this a more contiguous, more whole and capable pocket of land in order to then hold onto it long term,” he said.
The self-declared Donetsk People’s Republic claims all territory of the Donetsk region of Ukraine, but occupies only about half of it now. Rebel field commanders have spoken openly of a planned offensive for weeks.
Russia forcefully denied that any of its troops or equipment had crossed into eastern Ukraine, and a government spokesman dismissed General Breedlove as unreliable and “alarmist.”Russia forcefully denied that any of its troops or equipment had crossed into eastern Ukraine, and a government spokesman dismissed General Breedlove as unreliable and “alarmist.”
“We have stressed repeatedly that there have never been and there are no facts behind the regular blasts of hot air from Brussels regarding the supposed presence of Russian armed forces in Ukraine,” the spokesman, Maj. Gen. Igor Konashenkov told Russian news agencies on Wednesday. “We have stopped paying attention to NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe Gen. Philip Breedlove’s unfounded statements alleging that he observed Russian military convoys invading Ukraine.” “We have stressed repeatedly that there have never been and there are no facts behind the regular blasts of hot air from Brussels regarding the supposed presence of Russian armed forces in Ukraine,” the spokesman, Maj. Gen. Igor Konashenkov, told Russian news agencies on Wednesday. “We have stopped paying attention to NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe Gen. Philip Breedlove’s unfounded statements alleging that he observed Russian military convoys invading Ukraine.”
Sporadic fighting has continued from virtually the moment that the truce agreement was signed on Sept. 5 in Belarus, Minsk by Ukraine and Russia, as well as by representatives of separatist groups in eastern Ukraine and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, which helped broker the deal. Ukrainian officials have complained all along that Russia was taking advantage of the so-called truce to reinforce the rebels in eastern Ukraine with more fighters and equipment. Despite that denial, Col. Andriy Lysenko, a spokesman for Ukraine’s military, said at a a news conference in Kiev on Wednesday that there was grim evidence of Russia’s involvement moving in the opposite direction: five truckloads of bodies of slain Russian fighters, driven back to Russia on Tuesday night by a funeral parlor based in Rostov, Russia.
Sporadic fighting has continued from virtually the moment that the truce agreement was signed on Sept. 5 in Minsk, Belarus, by Ukraine and Russia, as well as by representatives of separatist groups in eastern Ukraine and the O.S.C.E., which helped broker the deal. Ukrainian officials have complained all along that Russia was taking advantage of the so-called truce to reinforce the rebels in eastern Ukraine with more fighters and equipment.
Skirmishes have continued virtually daily along sections of the front line: at the Donetsk Airport, on a highway hub in the town of Debaltseve, at an electrical plant north of Luhansk, and on a road leading from the Russian border to the Azov Sea port of Mariupol.
Artillery barrages hit in and near Donetsk multiple times a day owing to the fighting over the airport, now nothing more than an obliterated hulk of scorched steel, unnerving residents who remain in the city.
For weeks, however, officials on all sides had insisted that the cease-fire was holding as if force of will alone could perhaps make it so.For weeks, however, officials on all sides had insisted that the cease-fire was holding as if force of will alone could perhaps make it so.
The weeks of reluctance to acknowledge the fighting underscored the intractability of the conflict and the extraordinary difficulties that have been faced by policy makers looking for a way out of the conflict.The weeks of reluctance to acknowledge the fighting underscored the intractability of the conflict and the extraordinary difficulties that have been faced by policy makers looking for a way out of the conflict.
For the government of President Petro O. Poroshenko of Ukraine, acknowledging the failure of the cease-fire would have meant conceding his inability to exert control in the war zone. For Russia, it would have meant raising the likelihood of additional economic sanctions by Europe and the United States. And for Western officials it would have meant pressure to impose additional sanctions, which are highly unpopular among business interests in their own countries.For the government of President Petro O. Poroshenko of Ukraine, acknowledging the failure of the cease-fire would have meant conceding his inability to exert control in the war zone. For Russia, it would have meant raising the likelihood of additional economic sanctions by Europe and the United States. And for Western officials it would have meant pressure to impose additional sanctions, which are highly unpopular among business interests in their own countries.
The cease-fire agreement signed in Minsk had called for monitoring the Russia-Ukraine border by the O.S.C.E. and and had specifically required the removal of “unlawful military formations, military hardware, as well as militants and mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine.”The cease-fire agreement signed in Minsk had called for monitoring the Russia-Ukraine border by the O.S.C.E. and and had specifically required the removal of “unlawful military formations, military hardware, as well as militants and mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine.”
The border, however, has remained porous. And the O.S.C.E. has reported that some unmanned drones deployed to monitor the border had come under fire, apparently from the Russian side, though it was unclear who was responsible. The border, however, has remained porous. And the O.S.C.E. has reported that some unmanned drones deployed to monitor the border had come under fire, apparently from inside rebel-held territory, though it was unclear who was responsible.
General Breedlove said the critical point all along has been the lack of border controls.General Breedlove said the critical point all along has been the lack of border controls.
“What worries me the most, as I’ve said before, is that we have a situation now where the former international border, the current international border, of Ukraine and Russia, is completely porous; it is completely wide open. Forces, money, support, supplies, weapons are flowing back and forth across this border completely at will.”“What worries me the most, as I’ve said before, is that we have a situation now where the former international border, the current international border, of Ukraine and Russia, is completely porous; it is completely wide open. Forces, money, support, supplies, weapons are flowing back and forth across this border completely at will.”