This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boriss-60m-garden-bridge-will-have-no-public-right-of-way-no-protesting-and-no-cycling-9872176.html

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Boris's £60m ‘garden bridge’ will have no public right of way, no protesting, and no cycling Boris's £60m ‘garden bridge’ will have no public right of way, no protesting, and no cycling
(35 minutes later)
The Mayor of London’s planned £60m “garden bridge” over the River Thames in London will have no legal public right of way, it has been announced.The Mayor of London’s planned £60m “garden bridge” over the River Thames in London will have no legal public right of way, it has been announced.
The bridge will be managed as a privately-run tourist attraction and would be likely to require advance booking due to its limited capacity and likely popularity with tourists.The bridge will be managed as a privately-run tourist attraction and would be likely to require advance booking due to its limited capacity and likely popularity with tourists.
Protests and cycling will be banned on the new bridge, which will be closed after dark when views over the Thames are at their most dramatic and the tourist crowds have dispersed.Protests and cycling will be banned on the new bridge, which will be closed after dark when views over the Thames are at their most dramatic and the tourist crowds have dispersed.
£30m of the money for the attraction is coming out of London’s squeezed transport budget, despite Transport for London announcing yet another increase in fares set to come into force next year.£30m of the money for the attraction is coming out of London’s squeezed transport budget, despite Transport for London announcing yet another increase in fares set to come into force next year.
Central government is contributing another £30 for the bridge, which has high-profile celebrity backers including actress Joanna Lumley. Central government is contributing another £30m for the bridge, which has high-profile celebrity backers including actress Joanna Lumley.
Lambeth Council's planning report on the bridge says groups of eight or more would have to formally apply in advance to visit the bridge because they could constitute a "protest risk".Lambeth Council's planning report on the bridge says groups of eight or more would have to formally apply in advance to visit the bridge because they could constitute a "protest risk".
Campaigners are angry at the way the project has been handled, arguing that the privatisation of public space in the capital has gone too far and that resulting bridge won’t meet Londoners’ needs for a new pedestrian river crossing.Campaigners are angry at the way the project has been handled, arguing that the privatisation of public space in the capital has gone too far and that resulting bridge won’t meet Londoners’ needs for a new pedestrian river crossing.
“I was really shocked to discover that this bridge is receiving £60m from the joint transport budgets of the Mayor and the national government, but the public have no guaranteed right of way," Green Party member of the London Assembly Darren Johnson said.“I was really shocked to discover that this bridge is receiving £60m from the joint transport budgets of the Mayor and the national government, but the public have no guaranteed right of way," Green Party member of the London Assembly Darren Johnson said.
"Central London is a 24 hour city, but under the current proposals there is effectively no bridge for at least a quarter of the day. Given the scale of public funding for this bridge I would have expected the Mayor to have pinned down guarantees that Londoners will be able to use this bridge to cross the river 24/7 in ten or twenty years’ time.”"Central London is a 24 hour city, but under the current proposals there is effectively no bridge for at least a quarter of the day. Given the scale of public funding for this bridge I would have expected the Mayor to have pinned down guarantees that Londoners will be able to use this bridge to cross the river 24/7 in ten or twenty years’ time.”
The AM likened the bridge to the Mayor’s docklands cable car project, which is officially known as the “Emirates Airline” after the gulf state airline brought the rights to the name.The AM likened the bridge to the Mayor’s docklands cable car project, which is officially known as the “Emirates Airline” after the gulf state airline brought the rights to the name.
“The cable car was meant to help commuters get across the river, but got turned into a tourist attraction by the Mayor. This looks increasingly like another of the Mayor’s high profile, tourism projects funded from tube and bus fares,” he added.“The cable car was meant to help commuters get across the river, but got turned into a tourist attraction by the Mayor. This looks increasingly like another of the Mayor’s high profile, tourism projects funded from tube and bus fares,” he added.
When questioned in the bridge at the London Assembly earlier this year Boris Johnson said the project had an “extremely positive business case”.When questioned in the bridge at the London Assembly earlier this year Boris Johnson said the project had an “extremely positive business case”.
“[It] will directly support policies in my Transport Strategy for making London a more walkable and liveable city and support the economic development of London,” he said.“[It] will directly support policies in my Transport Strategy for making London a more walkable and liveable city and support the economic development of London,” he said.
The bridge is planned to run from Temple Station on the north side of the Thames to the Southbank Centre.The bridge is planned to run from Temple Station on the north side of the Thames to the Southbank Centre.