This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/republicans-call-obama-executive-actions-damaging-to-presidency-file-lawsuit-over-obamacare/2014/11/21/d3720d0e-7192-11e4-893f-86bd390a3340_story.html?wprss=rss_homepage

The article has changed 12 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Republicans call Obama executive actions ‘damaging to presidency,’ file lawsuit over Obamacare Republicans challenge Obama’s executive actions, file lawsuit over Obamacare
(35 minutes later)
House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) on Friday fired twin salvos at President Obama’s recent executive actions, announcing a House lawsuit challenging the implementation of the new health law and vowing to counter Obama’s move to provide relief to millions of illegal immigrants with legislative action. House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) on Friday fired twin salvos at President Obama’s recent executive actions, announcing a House lawsuit challenging the implementation of the 2010 health-care law and vowing to counter Obama’s move to provide relief to millions of illegal immigrants with legislative action.
In a clearly coordinated campaign against what Republicans have labeled as Obama’s “imperial presidency,” Boehner (R-Ohio) announced the lawsuit’s filing minutes after he publicly denounced Obama’s executive action on immigration. In a clearly coordinated campaign against what Republicans have labeled as Obama’s “imperial presidency,” Boehner announced the filing of the lawsuit minutes after he publicly denounced Obama’s executive action on immigration.
“If this president can get away with making his own laws, future presidents will have the ability to as well. The House has an obligation to stand up for the Constitution, and that is exactly why we are pursuing this course of action,” Boehner said in a statement. “If this president can get away with making his own laws, future presidents will have the ability to as well,” Boehner said in a statement. “The House has an obligation to stand up for the Constitution, and that is exactly why we are pursuing this course of action.”
The suit, which was approved by House Republicans four months ago, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the federal courthouse where most battles between the executive and legislative branches gets resolved. It will be led by Jonathan Turley, the law professor at the George Washington University Law School, who is the third legal adviser to handle the case. The suit, which was approved by House Republicans four months ago, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the federal courthouse where most battles between the executive and legislative branches get resolved. It will be led by Jonathan Turley, a law professor at the George Washington University Law School, who is the third legal adviser to handle the case.
Two other law firms had been hired to take the case but then later dropped the case, with Republicans saying they had received political pressure from partners to bow out and Democrats charging the case has no constitutional merits. Two other law firms had been hired to take the case but later dropped it, with Republicans saying they had received political pressure from partners to bow out and Democrats charging that the case has no constitutional merits.
The focus of the case has some legal irony. Republicans are focusing on Obama’s move to delaying portions of the law that mandated individuals must purchase health insurance or else face certain tax penalties. As the rollout of the law became increasingly chaotic in 2013, Obama issued an order to delay portions of the mandate. The focus of the case has some legal irony. Republicans are focusing on Obama’s move to delay portions of the law that mandated individuals must purchase health insurance or face certain tax penalties. As the rollout of the law became increasingly chaotic in 2013, Obama issued an order to delay portions of the mandate.
Republicans contend that he could not manipulate that portion of the law without congressional input. However, the individual mandate, as it is known, is the cornerstone of the Affordable Care Act and Republicans had tried previously to get legal rulings that it was unconstitutional, losing a 2012 case before the Supreme Court on the matter. Republicans contend that he could not manipulate that portion of the law without congressional input. However, the “individual mandate” is the cornerstone of the Affordable Care Act, and Republicans had tried previously to get legal rulings that it was unconstitutional, losing a 2012 case before the Supreme Court on the matter.
Now, in their challenge on executive actions, the House GOP are confronting Obama for altering that portion of the law. Now, in their challenge on executive actions, the House GOP is confronting Obama for altering that portion of the law.
In recent weeks, some Republicans have pushed for including the immigration order in the lawsuit against the president, but that is not the case for now. Instead, Boehner promised action in the House to counter Obama’s plans.In recent weeks, some Republicans have pushed for including the immigration order in the lawsuit against the president, but that is not the case for now. Instead, Boehner promised action in the House to counter Obama’s plans.
“We’re working with our members and looking at the options available to us, but I will say to you the House will, in fact, act,” Boehner told reporters Friday morning, in the first televised Republican rebuttal to Obama’s prime-time address Thursday night. “We’re working with our members and looking at the options available to us, but I will say to you the House will, in fact, act,” Boehner told reporters Friday morning in the first televised Republican rebuttal to Obama’s prime-time address Thursday night.
Boehner declined to spell out exactly how Republicans would counter the immigration executive actions, which extend protections to roughly 4 million undocumented parents of legal U.S. citizens and young immigrants brought here illegally when they were children.Boehner declined to spell out exactly how Republicans would counter the immigration executive actions, which extend protections to roughly 4 million undocumented parents of legal U.S. citizens and young immigrants brought here illegally when they were children.
He dodged a question about the assertion by one of his own leadership team members, House Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers (R-Ky.), that there was little Congress could do to restrict funding for the new program. Rogers and his staff said Thursday that funding for the implementation of the new policy does not come from the annual spending bills approved by Congress but instead comes from border fees, placing it outside the reach of congressional Republicans. He dodged a question about the assertion by one of his own leadership team members, House Appropriations Chairman Harold Rogers (R-Ky.), that there was little Congress could do to restrict funding for the new program. Rogers and his staff said Thursday that funding for the implementation of the new policy does not come from the annual spending bills approved by Congress but instead comes from border fees, placing it outside the reach of congressional Republicans.
Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the leading opponent of the president’s action, told reporters Thursday that he would support attaching a policy rider onto the government funding bills that simply forbid the federal workforce from implementing the new rules on immigration. Sessions is leading the effort to keep government funding to a short leash into the new year, when Republicans take over the Senate and control both chambers of Congress, making it easier to get clear majorities for his preferred line of attack. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the leading opponent of the president’s action, told reporters Thursday that he would support attaching a policy rider onto the government funding bills that simply forbid the federal workforce from implementing the new rules on immigration. Sessions is leading the effort to keep government funding on a short leash in the new year, when Republicans take over the Senate and control both chambers of Congress, making it easier to get clear majorities for his preferred line of attack.
Such a move would require a 60-vote super-majority in the Senate, and it would almost certainly draw a veto from Obama, which, critics say, would lead to a possible shutdown of some federal agencies. Such a move would require a 60-vote supermajority in the Senate, and it would almost certainly draw a veto from Obama, which, critics say, would lead to a possible shutdown of some federal agencies.
Boehner deflected those questions and instead blamed Obama for issuing too many executive orders to modify the controversial new health law that took effect over the last year, which left his rank-and-file Republicans unwilling to trust the president and refusing to even consider a broad rewrite of immigration laws.Boehner deflected those questions and instead blamed Obama for issuing too many executive orders to modify the controversial new health law that took effect over the last year, which left his rank-and-file Republicans unwilling to trust the president and refusing to even consider a broad rewrite of immigration laws.
“He created an environment where the members could not trust him, and trying to find a way to work together was virtually impossible, and I had warned the president over and over that his actions were making it impossible for me to do what he wanted me to do,” the speaker said, explaining his inability to even consider smaller pieces of the 2013 Senate-approved legislation that revamped border and immigration laws.“He created an environment where the members could not trust him, and trying to find a way to work together was virtually impossible, and I had warned the president over and over that his actions were making it impossible for me to do what he wanted me to do,” the speaker said, explaining his inability to even consider smaller pieces of the 2013 Senate-approved legislation that revamped border and immigration laws.
“We have a broken immigration system, and the American people expect us to work together to fix it, and we ought to do it through the democratic process,” he said.“We have a broken immigration system, and the American people expect us to work together to fix it, and we ought to do it through the democratic process,” he said.
In his prime-time speech from the East Room of the White House, Obama blamed Republicans for forcing his hand by refusing to approve immigration reform and told them, “Pass a bill.”In his prime-time speech from the East Room of the White House, Obama blamed Republicans for forcing his hand by refusing to approve immigration reform and told them, “Pass a bill.”
Conservatives inside and outside Congress want to use the budget process as a battleground to wage war against Obama and his immigration program. The proposed gambit raises the specter of another government shutdown, akin to the one that damaged Republicans last year.Conservatives inside and outside Congress want to use the budget process as a battleground to wage war against Obama and his immigration program. The proposed gambit raises the specter of another government shutdown, akin to the one that damaged Republicans last year.
In a floor speech Thursday, soon-to-be Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) suggested that his preference would be for Republicans to avoid becoming mired in a fiscal clash during the lame-duck session, shortly before the GOP takes control of the Senate in January.In a floor speech Thursday, soon-to-be Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) suggested that his preference would be for Republicans to avoid becoming mired in a fiscal clash during the lame-duck session, shortly before the GOP takes control of the Senate in January.
Many conservative lawmakers are shrugging off those pleas, however. Furious with the president, they are planning a series of immediate and hard-line actions that could have sweeping consequences. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) said Wednesday that Obama’s executive action should be met with a refusal to vote on any more of his nominees, and on Thursday, he compared the action with the ancient Catiline conspiracy, a plot to overthrow the Roman Republic. Many conservative lawmakers are shrugging off those pleas, however. Furious with the president, they are planning a series of immediate and hard-line actions that could have sweeping consequences. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) said Wednesday that Obama’s executive action should be met with a refusal to vote on any more of his nominees, and on Thursday, he compared the action to the ancient Catiline conspiracy, a plot to overthrow the Roman Republic.
Sessions (R-Ala.), likely the next chairman of the budget committee, has advocated for a series of stopgap spending bills with the intent of pressuring the president to relent. Sessions is the featured speaker at a Heritage Foundation event Friday morning in response to Obama’s moves. Sessions, probably the next chairman of the budget committee, has advocated for a series of stopgap spending bills with the intent of pressuring the president to relent. Sessions is the featured speaker at a Heritage Foundation event Friday morning in response to Obama’s moves.
And Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) — one of the loudest voices on the right — has hinted at bringing up impeachment measures. “We have constitutional authority to do a string of things. [Impeachment] would be the very last option, but I would not rule it out,” King said Thursday on CNN.And Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) — one of the loudest voices on the right — has hinted at bringing up impeachment measures. “We have constitutional authority to do a string of things. [Impeachment] would be the very last option, but I would not rule it out,” King said Thursday on CNN.
Robert Costa contributed to this report.Robert Costa contributed to this report.