This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/nov/26/royal-mail-nationwide-universal-delivery-service

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Royal Mail nationwide delivery service ‘in peril’ Cable says Royal Mail ‘scaremongering’ over universal delivery service
(about 1 hour later)
Royal Mail has stepped up warnings that its public duty to deliver mail anywhere in the country, six days a week, for the same price, is under threat. Vince Cable has accused Royal Mail of “scaremongering” over claims that it will not be able to maintain a universal delivery service.
The business secretary, who oversaw the controversial privatisation of Royal Mail, said the government did not want companies “whinging” about being in a competitive market.
His intervention came after Royal Mail stepped up warnings that its public duty to deliver mail anywhere in the country, six days a week, for the same price, is under threat.
Chief executive Moya Greene told a committee of MPs that the universal service obligation was “precious” and essential for most people. But it had a high fixed cost and depended on steady revenues from urban areas to cross-subsidise more costly deliveries to rural parts of the country, she said.Chief executive Moya Greene told a committee of MPs that the universal service obligation was “precious” and essential for most people. But it had a high fixed cost and depended on steady revenues from urban areas to cross-subsidise more costly deliveries to rural parts of the country, she said.
Royal Mail faced a 4-6% decline in its letters business each year, while competitors were being allowed to “cherry-pick” the easiest and most lucrative deliveries to urban areas, putting the economics of the universal service at risk, Green said. Royal Mail faced a 4-6% decline in its letters business each year, while competitors were being allowed to “cherry-pick” the easiest and most lucrative deliveries to urban areas, putting the economics of the universal service at risk, Greene said.
“If you allow cherry-picking in urban areas you undermine the economics,” she told MPs. “It siphons off very quickly a lot of revenue, more revenue than can be offset even by very vigorous efficiency measures.”“If you allow cherry-picking in urban areas you undermine the economics,” she told MPs. “It siphons off very quickly a lot of revenue, more revenue than can be offset even by very vigorous efficiency measures.”
Greene urged the postal regulator, Ofcom, to bring forward a review into safeguarding the universal service obligation, “before too much damage is done”. The watchdog has pledged to begin its work before the end of 2015.Greene urged the postal regulator, Ofcom, to bring forward a review into safeguarding the universal service obligation, “before too much damage is done”. The watchdog has pledged to begin its work before the end of 2015.
Her demand was supported by trade unions, who said there was a need for urgent action to protect the universal service. “The sustainability of the universal service obligation faces its greatest threat at the moment,” said Dave Ward, deputy general secretary at the Communication Workers Union, which represents 90% of Royal Mail staff. Her demand was supported by trade unions, which said there was a need for urgent action to protect the universal service. “The sustainability of the universal service obligation faces its greatest threat at the moment,” said Dave Ward, deputy general secretary at the Communication Workers Union, which represents 90% of Royal Mail staff.
But Royal Mail’s competitors denied the universal service was in peril and said the entry of more players into the market has been good for consumers. “The benefit of competition is that we will keep Royal Mail honest, keep prices down and keep consumers posting,” said Nick Wells, chief executive of Whistl, a private operator that emerged after TNT Group split in 2011.But Royal Mail’s competitors denied the universal service was in peril and said the entry of more players into the market has been good for consumers. “The benefit of competition is that we will keep Royal Mail honest, keep prices down and keep consumers posting,” said Nick Wells, chief executive of Whistl, a private operator that emerged after TNT Group split in 2011.
Royal Mail revealed last week that it had been forced to scale back growth forecasts for its parcels business after the online retailer Amazon began developing its own delivery operations. Amazon launched the same-day service in the UK last month, with a promise to deliver parcels to hundreds of newsagents across the country. Royal Mail revealed last week that it had been forced to scale back growth forecasts for its parcels business, after the online retailer Amazon began developing its own delivery operations. Amazon launched the same-day service in the UK last month, with a promise to deliver parcels to hundreds of newsagents across the country.
Roy Perticucci, vice-president of Amazon’s EU operations, declined to comment on reports that its service had led to a 20% drop in Royal Mail’s parcel volumes in some localities, citing commercial confidentiality. In his evidence to MPs on the business, innovation and skills select committee, Perticucci said Amazon’s delivery service aimed to be cheaper than Royal Mail’s, but insisted the prime motivation was to ensure a faster and more convenient service. Roy Perticucci, vice-president of Amazon’s EU operations, declined to comment on reports that its service had led to a 20% drop in Royal Mail’s parcel volumes in some localities, citing commercial confidentiality.