This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/28/business/international/google-european-union.html

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
E.U. Parliament, in Nonbinding Measure, Calls for Breaking Up Google E.U. Parliament, in Nonbinding Measure, Calls for Breaking Up Google
(26 minutes later)
BRUSSELS — The European Parliament on Thursday approved a nonbinding resolution for Google to be broken up into separate companies.BRUSSELS — The European Parliament on Thursday approved a nonbinding resolution for Google to be broken up into separate companies.
There is no immediate threat to Google from the vote, which amounts to little more than political posturing because the Parliament has no formal power over antitrust policy in the 28-member trade bloc.There is no immediate threat to Google from the vote, which amounts to little more than political posturing because the Parliament has no formal power over antitrust policy in the 28-member trade bloc.
But the vote signifies the increasing trans-Atlantic tensions over the dominant role that Google, an American technology titan, plays in Europe. The vote followed a separate move on Wednesday to rein in the company by a European regulatory body that aims to protect the electronic privacy of European citizens.But the vote signifies the increasing trans-Atlantic tensions over the dominant role that Google, an American technology titan, plays in Europe. The vote followed a separate move on Wednesday to rein in the company by a European regulatory body that aims to protect the electronic privacy of European citizens.
Thursday’s vote could also raise pressure on Margrethe Vestager, the bloc’s recently installed competition commissioner, to speed up a decision on whether to bring formal antitrust charges against Google in a long-running investigation. That inquiry involves Google’s dominant position in Europe’s Internet search business, and asks whether the company’s search results favor its own advertisers and other Google-related services. Thursday’s vote could also raise pressure on Margrethe Vestager, the bloc’s recently installed competition commissioner, to speed up a decision on whether to bring formal antitrust charges against Google in a long-running investigation. That inquiry, begun in 2010, involves Google’s dominant position in Europe’s Internet search business, and asks whether the company’s search results favor other Google-related services and whether Google impedes its competitors’ search-advertising platforms.
The vote on Thursday was on a broader resolution on the digital economy that passed with 384 votes in favor, 174 against and 56 abstentions. The resolution, which was backed by large numbers of lawmakers from the European People’s Party and the Socialists & Democrats, the two main political blocs in the Parliament. The vote on Thursday was on a broader resolution on the digital economy that passed with 384 votes in favor, 174 against and 56 abstentions. The resolution, which broadly called on the European authorities to break down competitive barriers in digital commerce, was backed by large numbers of lawmakers from the European People’s Party and the Socialists & Democrats, the two main political blocs in the Parliament.
Ms. Vestager, a Danish free-market liberal who took office on Nov. 1, replaced Joaquín Almunia, who initiated the antitrust investigation of Google and tried several times to settle with the company but abandoned those efforts after the company’s competitors said the proposed settlement terms was too lenient. Ms. Vestager has insisted on taking the necessary time before deciding on next steps in that antitrust case. Ms. Vestager, a Danish free-market liberal who took office on Nov. 1, replaced Joaquín Almunia, who initiated the antitrust investigation of Google and tried three times to settle with the company but abandoned those efforts after the company’s competitors and other groups said the proposed settlement terms would be ineffective. Ms. Vestager has insisted on taking the necessary time before deciding on next steps in that antitrust case.
She must also decide whether to open a formal investigation into Google’s Android mobile operating system. She must also decide whether to open a formal investigation into Google’s Android mobile operating system. A preliminary inquiry, also begun under Mr. Almunia, has been considering whether Google uses Android to discriminate against non-Google applications.
But Ricardo Cardoso, Ms. Vestager’s spokesman, said before Thursday’s parliamentary vote that she would not be swayed by the result. Antitrust should be “independent from politics” so that Europe’s “procedures are not put into question,” Mr. Cardoso said. Ricardo Cardoso, Ms. Vestager’s spokesman, said after Thursday’s parliamentary vote that she would not be swayed by the result. Antitrust should be “independent from politics” so that Europe’s “procedures are not put into question,” Mr. Cardoso said.
The outcry against Google is nonetheless hard to ignore.The outcry against Google is nonetheless hard to ignore.
None of the deals offered by Mr. Almunia satisfied rivals and critics of Google, whose search engine, with about 90 percent of the market in some European Union countries, is even more dominant in Europe than it is in the United States. The lack of a settlement means that Google could still face a fine of nearly $6 billion and restrictions on its freedom to do business in Europe if it is eventually found to have broken European Union competition laws.None of the deals offered by Mr. Almunia satisfied rivals and critics of Google, whose search engine, with about 90 percent of the market in some European Union countries, is even more dominant in Europe than it is in the United States. The lack of a settlement means that Google could still face a fine of nearly $6 billion and restrictions on its freedom to do business in Europe if it is eventually found to have broken European Union competition laws.
The resolution approved on Thursday addressed a number of issues concerning Europe’s digital economy. The proposal, in the form of an amendment, did not attack Google directly, even though the company was widely assumed to be the target. Instead it called on Ms. Vestager’s department “to consider proposals aimed at unbundling search engines from other commercial services as one potential long-term means" of introducing more competition into online search in Europe. The resolution approved on Thursday addressed a number of issues concerning Europe’s digital economy. The breakup proposal, which opponents to the measure had sought to dilute or delete, did not attack Google directly, even though the company was widely assumed to be the target. Instead it called on Ms. Vestager’s department “to consider proposals aimed at unbundling search engines from other commercial services as one potential long-term means” of introducing more competition into online search in Europe.
Among the proponents of tough antitrust action against Google in Europe who will be cheered by the result on Thursday are major American technology companies like Microsoft and Yelp, as well as powerful German and French publishing groups that have formed a lobbying group called the Open Internet Project.Among the proponents of tough antitrust action against Google in Europe who will be cheered by the result on Thursday are major American technology companies like Microsoft and Yelp, as well as powerful German and French publishing groups that have formed a lobbying group called the Open Internet Project.
Lobbying over the Google case has grown dramatically as the stakes have risen for control of the digital economy.Lobbying over the Google case has grown dramatically as the stakes have risen for control of the digital economy.
The breakup resolution was introduced by Andreas Schwab, a German member of the European Parliament. Mr. Schwab is “of counsel” at the German law and lobbying firm CMS Hasche Sigle, which has represented some of the German publishing interests that have been most eager to curb Google, including the German Magazine Publishers association. He earns roughly $15,000 to $75,000 annually from the firm, according to a disclosure filing. The firm’s website lists his expertise as competition policy. The breakup language was introduced by Andreas Schwab, a German member of the European Parliament. Mr. Schwab is “of counsel” at the German law and lobbying firm CMS Hasche Sigle, which has represented some of the German publishing interests that have been most eager to curb Google, including the German Magazine Publishers association. He earns roughly $15,000 to $75,000 annually from the firm, according to a disclosure filing. The firm’s website lists his expertise as competition policy.
Mr. Schwab said he had not discussed the resolution with the law firm. Addressing the Parliament late Wednesday to urge passage of his resolution Mr. Schwab said he wanted to enable all businesses to “participate on an equal footing” in Europe’s digital sector.Mr. Schwab said he had not discussed the resolution with the law firm. Addressing the Parliament late Wednesday to urge passage of his resolution Mr. Schwab said he wanted to enable all businesses to “participate on an equal footing” in Europe’s digital sector.
Evelyne Gebhardt, a Socialist lawmaker from Germany, told the Parliament ahead of the vote that she supported the resolution “to make sure that our young entrepreneurs — young people coming out of university who are building things, who have new ideas — have an opportunity to give their services quite freely” on the Internet.Evelyne Gebhardt, a Socialist lawmaker from Germany, told the Parliament ahead of the vote that she supported the resolution “to make sure that our young entrepreneurs — young people coming out of university who are building things, who have new ideas — have an opportunity to give their services quite freely” on the Internet.
It is “high time” that the bloc’s antitrust authority “came up with a result,” Ms. Gebhardt said.It is “high time” that the bloc’s antitrust authority “came up with a result,” Ms. Gebhardt said.
The run-up to the vote mobilized an international lobbying effort, with American consumer advocates and Google’s rivals supporting the resolution, while dozens of powerful members of Congress in Washington and Gov. Jerry Brown of California, where Google is based, strongly condemning the initiative.The run-up to the vote mobilized an international lobbying effort, with American consumer advocates and Google’s rivals supporting the resolution, while dozens of powerful members of Congress in Washington and Gov. Jerry Brown of California, where Google is based, strongly condemning the initiative.
Leaders of congressional trade committees warned that the vote could even imperil negotiations over a trans-Atlantic trade pact, which the European Union has made a priority as part of its efforts to jump-start growth and create new jobs.Leaders of congressional trade committees warned that the vote could even imperil negotiations over a trans-Atlantic trade pact, which the European Union has made a priority as part of its efforts to jump-start growth and create new jobs.
Some European lawmakers, including Kaja Kallas of Estonia, warned late Wednesday that the resolution was a wrongheaded effort aimed to protect vested interests in Europe. “I am disappointed that discussion over this resolution has turned into an anti-Google debate,” she said. “Many decision makers still see digital solutions as a threat, rather than an opportunity.”Some European lawmakers, including Kaja Kallas of Estonia, warned late Wednesday that the resolution was a wrongheaded effort aimed to protect vested interests in Europe. “I am disappointed that discussion over this resolution has turned into an anti-Google debate,” she said. “Many decision makers still see digital solutions as a threat, rather than an opportunity.”
But that effort failed to head off the resolution amid growing distrust of big American technology companies like Google that many Europeans consider cavalier about citizens’ privacy and too powerful to enable competitors, particularly in Germany, to gain a toehold.But that effort failed to head off the resolution amid growing distrust of big American technology companies like Google that many Europeans consider cavalier about citizens’ privacy and too powerful to enable competitors, particularly in Germany, to gain a toehold.