This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/panel-calls-for-deep-changes-in-secret-service/2014/12/18/422b8612-86f1-11e4-b9b7-b8632ae73d25_story.html?wprss=rss_homepage
The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 2 | Version 3 |
|---|---|
| Panel calls for deep changes at the Secret Service | Panel calls for deep changes at the Secret Service |
| (about 1 hour later) | |
| An independent panel Thursday recommending sweeping changes at the Secret Service, saying the elite protective agency is “starved for leadership” and calling for a new director, hundreds of new agents and officers and a higher fence around the White House. | |
| The panel, created in October after a series of highly publicized security failures, said the fence protecting the executive mansion should be raised at least four feet to make it less vulnerable to jumpers. Panel members were reacting to a Sept. 19 incident in which a man scaled the fence and ran far into the White House through an unlocked front door. | |
| The four-person body also urged intensified training for agents, saying they should run crisis response scenarios that could use a mock White House. The report especially targeted the Secret Service’s highly insular culture, calling for a new director from outside the agency, a suggestion sure to rankle some in the service’s old guard. | |
| “The problems exposed by recent events go deeper than a new fence can fix,’’ said the report’s executive summary. “We believe that at this time in the agency’s history, the need for Service experience is outweighed by what the Service needs today: dynamic leadership that can move the Service forward into a new era and drive change in the organization.’’ | “The problems exposed by recent events go deeper than a new fence can fix,’’ said the report’s executive summary. “We believe that at this time in the agency’s history, the need for Service experience is outweighed by what the Service needs today: dynamic leadership that can move the Service forward into a new era and drive change in the organization.’’ |
| The report comes after a cascade of revelations, including reports by The Post that detailed the agency’s fumbling response to a November 2011 incident in which a man fired a semiautomatic rifle at the White House residence while Sasha Obama was home. The revelations led to the resignation of Julia Pierson as Secret Service director and a re-examination of an agency that had long been highly regarded — and immortalized in Hollywood films. | The report comes after a cascade of revelations, including reports by The Post that detailed the agency’s fumbling response to a November 2011 incident in which a man fired a semiautomatic rifle at the White House residence while Sasha Obama was home. The revelations led to the resignation of Julia Pierson as Secret Service director and a re-examination of an agency that had long been highly regarded — and immortalized in Hollywood films. |
| In a statement, Johnson called the report “astute, thorough and fair . . . The Secret Service itself must commit to change.’’ He vowed that Homeland Security, of which the Secret Service is a part, would actively monitor the reforms to “ensure that the Secret Service has and utilizes what it needs to get the job done.’’ | In a statement, Johnson called the report “astute, thorough and fair . . . The Secret Service itself must commit to change.’’ He vowed that Homeland Security, of which the Secret Service is a part, would actively monitor the reforms to “ensure that the Secret Service has and utilizes what it needs to get the job done.’’ |
| Republicans said the report did not go far enough in addressing wide-ranging cultural flaws inside the agency. “While this review is a good start, the (Secret Service) faces significant challenges on how to best prioritize reforms in these tight budgetary times,’’ said Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee. He called for Congress to create a panel “to conduct a truly independent, bipartisan, top-to-bottom review.’’ | Republicans said the report did not go far enough in addressing wide-ranging cultural flaws inside the agency. “While this review is a good start, the (Secret Service) faces significant challenges on how to best prioritize reforms in these tight budgetary times,’’ said Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee. He called for Congress to create a panel “to conduct a truly independent, bipartisan, top-to-bottom review.’’ |
| The panel was composed of two former Obama administration officials -- former associate attorney general Tom Perrelli and Cabinet secretary Danielle Gray — and two who served under President George W. Bush — Mark Filip, a former deputy attorney general, and Joseph Hagin, a former deputy chief of staff for operations. None of the panelists has served in the Secret Service. | The panel was composed of two former Obama administration officials -- former associate attorney general Tom Perrelli and Cabinet secretary Danielle Gray — and two who served under President George W. Bush — Mark Filip, a former deputy attorney general, and Joseph Hagin, a former deputy chief of staff for operations. None of the panelists has served in the Secret Service. |
| The panel’s full report was not released, and many of its recommendations were not included in the executive summary because officials said they were too sensitive. | The panel’s full report was not released, and many of its recommendations were not included in the executive summary because officials said they were too sensitive. |
| In the executive summary, the panel noted that some of its physical security recommendations dated all the way back to suggestions made by the Warren Commission that investigated the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, along with more recent reviews of the service. The panel said it was not discussing the details of those recommendations to avoid sharing security vulnerabilities. | In the executive summary, the panel noted that some of its physical security recommendations dated all the way back to suggestions made by the Warren Commission that investigated the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, along with more recent reviews of the service. The panel said it was not discussing the details of those recommendations to avoid sharing security vulnerabilities. |
| A culture change inside the service is necessary, the panel found, saying that “some will resist and will need to move on.’’ | A culture change inside the service is necessary, the panel found, saying that “some will resist and will need to move on.’’ |
| Change, panel members agreed, “can be difficult for | Change, panel members agreed, “can be difficult for |
| an organization with such a storied history. Some in the Secret Service will resist and may need to move on.” | an organization with such a storied history. Some in the Secret Service will resist and may need to move on.” |