This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/mcdonnell-attorneys-will-seek-public-service-for-former-va-governor/2014/12/23/7fc8ffb2-8aa8-11e4-8ff4-fb93129c9c8b_story.html?wprss=rss_homepage
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 2 | Version 3 |
---|---|
McDonnell’s attorneys will seek public service for former Va. governor | McDonnell’s attorneys will seek public service for former Va. governor |
(about 4 hours later) | |
Defense attorneys for former Virginia governor Robert F. McDonnell asked a judge on Tuesday to spare their client from any prison time — arguing that his life is already in shambles and that 6,000 hours of community service would be punishment enough. | |
In a court filing that pronounced the former governor’s political career “dead” and claimed that his marriage had “fallen apart,” McDonnell’s defense attorneys urged U.S. District Judge James R. Spencer to consider sending their client to tutor students in Haiti or help manage a food distribution facility in rural Bristol, Va. | |
Even without going to jail, they argued, McDonnell and his family had “already suffered tremendously” during a public corruption trial that put some of their most intimate and unflattering moments on public display. They claimed that the former governor is so deep in debt that he would be forced to sell his family home, adding that throwing him in prison would be a “severely disproportionate punishment” for the crimes of which he was convicted. | |
“No elected official would want to live through the last year of Mr. McDonnell’s life,” defense attorneys wrote. “Indeed, every indication is that the Government’s message was delivered loud and clear.” | “No elected official would want to live through the last year of Mr. McDonnell’s life,” defense attorneys wrote. “Indeed, every indication is that the Government’s message was delivered loud and clear.” |
For their part, prosecutors fired back that the probation office’s recommended sentence of between 10 years and a month and 12 years and seven months would be appropriate for someone who wielded enormous influence and chose to abuse it. | |
“He understood the power and trust given to elected officials and that corruption benefits the few at the expense of the many,” prosecutors wrote. “Despite the advantages of his family upbringing and educational opportunities, the defendant chose to violate the trust of the Commonwealth’s citizens to line his pockets.” | |
The dueling requests filed Tuesday in federal district court in Richmond are both sides’ first formal pitches to Spencer about what penalty would serve as justice in the high-profile case. McDonnell and his wife, Maureen, were convicted in September of public corruption for lending the prestige of the governor’s office to Richmond businessman Jonnie R. Williams Sr. in exchange for $177,000 in loans, vacations and luxury goods. | |
The former governor is scheduled to be sentenced Jan. 6, and his wife is scheduled to be sentenced Feb. 20. The parties have not yet formally begun debating her term. | |
People who know the McDonnells say they have been living apart since the trial. | |
By all accounts, Spencer seems far more likely to side with prosecutors than defense attorneys, as experts say he is generally known to follow the probation office’s recommendation. But McDonnell’s team nonetheless mounted a vigorous pushback, arguing that the probation office’s calculation was “patently unfair.” The guideline range, they said, should have been two years and nine months to three years and five months — although even that, they argued, would be too harsh a sentence. | |
McDonnell defense attorney Henry Asbill and U.S. Attorney Dana Boente declined to comment for this article. | |
The requests from each side were far different in tone and length. The prosecutors’ memo was relatively brief, focusing largely on the technical aspects of the probation office’s recommendation and noting McDonnell’s sense of entitlement and failure to show remorse. | |
Prosecutors wrote that McDonnell’s crimes “have only further undermined public confidence in the integrity of public officials” and urged the judge to send a message to others in positions of power that such conduct is not acceptable. | |
McDonnell’s sentencing memorandum, by contrast, spun a winding narrative, tracing the former governor’s life from the time of his birth in Philadelphia to now. It described, without sparing any details, the former governor’s service in the Army and his many accomplishments during his political career in its argument that a prison sentence would remove a valuable asset from society. | |
Attached to the defense’s request were 440 letters from supporters from all facets of McDonnell’s life, including college and high school friends, fellow service members, former staffers and all five of his children. Jeanine Zubowsky, one of McDonnell’s daughters, asked the judge to show mercy on her father, noting that she has a child due next month. | |
“I plead that whatever sentence you choose, that it will be lenient so that he may be able to get to know his first grandchild that arrives in January,” Zubowsky wrote. | |
Prominent businessman like Dominion CEO Thomas F. Farrell II, a high school classmate of McDonnell’s, and Norfolk Southern CEO Charles Moorman, also chimed in on the governor’s behalf. So did Sen. Timothy M. Kaine (D-Va.), who wrote that he did not question the jury’s verdict but wanted the court to know about McDonnell’s efforts to restore voting rights to convicted felons. | |
McDonnell’s attorneys, interestingly, seemed to continue to quibble with the prosecution’s case — even as they stressed that the former governor had owned up to his mistakes. | |
They also wrote that they were “aware of no instance of the Government successfully prosecuting any public official on the basis of access-oriented acts like those upon which Mr. McDonnell’s conviction was based.” But they also wrote that the former governor “accepts full responsibility for his poor decision to accept travel, golf, and loans from Mr. Williams” — a decision they termed a “total aberration in what was by all accounts a successful and honorable career.” | |
They asked the judge to consider McDonnell’s conviction “in the context of the culture of Virginia politics, in which numerous state officials routinely took advantage of these laws and accepted luxury vacations, rounds of golf, sports tickets, dinners, and other things of value from donors and wealthy hangers-on.” | |
The former governor’s defense attorneys also attached to their filing several proposals from organizations for which McDonnell might perform his community service over the next three years. Operation Blessing International, a Christian humanitarian organization, wrote that McDonnell could serve as a “manager” of its food distribution facility in Bristol, where he would oversee shipments and inventory, run a forklift, and help with loading and delivering supplies. | |
The Catholic Diocese of Richmond said that McDonnell could serve as its “Far Southwest Regional Coordinator,” reaching out to migrant workers and perhaps helping to write grants and collect data. More than one organization advocated service in Haiti, including the University of Notre Dame, where McDonnell went to college. | |
“In light of the scope of Haiti’s need and Mr. McDonnell’s many years of public service and experience in public policy and reform, we believe that Mr. McDonnell can be far more valuable to society as a dedicated volunteer rather than serving a prison sentence,” wrote Anthony J. D’Agostino, the associate director for Haitian Catholic Education Initiatives at the university. | |
McDonnell’s attorneys stressed that he would not be paid for such work, even though it would be full time. Prosecutors noted in their filing that as of June 2014 — before the weeks-long trial — the former governor owed more than $4.4 million to four law firms, not including the firm of one of his two lead attorneys. | |
Those bills, they said, had given them reason to drop their objection to the probation office’s assessment that McDonnell was unable to pay a fine. |