This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/05/confusion-india-defence-ministry-claim-sunken-pakistani-boat-exploded

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Confusion as India’s defence ministry claim sunken Pakistani boat exploded Confusion as India’s defence ministry claims sunken Pakistani boat exploded
(about 11 hours later)
Whether the men on the fishing boat that sank in the Arabian Sea on New Year’s Eve were heavily armed terrorists planning another Mumbai-style attack, or whether they were just smugglers transporting contraband goods, there’s only one certainty in the high seas drama involving the Indian coastguard and a Pakistani vessel. The boat did not explode, but went down in an orange glow after it caught fire. Whether the men on the fishing boat that sank in the Arabian Sea on New Year’s Eve were heavily armed terrorists planning another Mumbai-style attack, or just smugglers transporting contraband goods, there is only one certainty in the high seas drama involving the Indian coastguard and a Pakistani vessel. The boat did not explode, but went down in an orange glow after it caught fire.
India’s defence ministry, however, claimed there was an explosion, a detail intended, analysts suspect, to bolster the accusation that the Pakistani boat was intercepted by the coastguard as it allegedly proceeded on a terror mission, loaded with weapons and explosives, towards Gujarat, prime minister Narendra Modi’s home state. India’s defence ministry, however, claimed there was an explosion, a detail intended, analysts suspect, to bolster the accusation that the Pakistani boat was intercepted by the coastguard as it allegedly proceeded on a terrorist mission, loaded with weapons and explosives, towards Gujarat, which is the prime minister, Narendra Modi’s, home state.
All four men on board went down with the vessel.All four men on board went down with the vessel.
“The photograph of the burning boat definitely suggests no explosives were detonated on board,” a retired Indian navy admiral told the Guardian. “That would have resulted in a white hot blast, not the orange glow of diesel flames. The intelligence guys are not telling us all they know about how this boat came to their attention.” “The photograph of the burning boat definitely suggests no explosives were detonated on board,” a retired Indian admiral told the Guardian. “That would have resulted in a white hot blast, not the orange glow of diesel flames.”
But oddly enough, both the internal and external intelligence agencies in India reportedly came to know about the suspect Pakistani fishing boat long after it sank, when the coastguard interceptor ship returned to its base in Gujarat on New Year’s day. India’s defence minister, Manohar Parrikar, insisted on Monday that “all the circumstantial evidence points to the fact that it was a terror boat” and not a drug-smuggling vessel. The boat remained at one location for 12 hours, it was in touch with Pakistan’s maritime security agency and the crew “committed suicide, hara-kiri”, he said. “Even drug smugglers surrender when caught, they don’t commit suicide.”
The boat came to the attention of Indian authorities when an agency tasked with tracking electronic communications in the region intercepted Thuraya satellite phone conversations about a suspicious ‘goods consignment’. The agency did not send the data for intelligence analysis. Instead, it informed the Indian navy and coast guard. Parrikar was responding to a report in the Indian Express from Karachi that the boat was actually on a smuggling run, carrying dates, alcohol and heroin for a Balochistan-based smuggler. The boat’s name was given as Qalandar and its captain was Yaqoob Baloch, from the Lyari district of Karachi. The paper quoted Baloch’s mother saying: “My son had nothing to do with terrorists.”
But the navy, which has primary responsibility for guarding the seas, ignored the alert. However, the coastguard commander based in the Gujarat city of Porbandar, Mahatma Gandhi’s birthplace, decided to act. Delhi-based analysts sceptical of the “smuggling boat” theory see it as disinformation emanating from India’s intelligence agencies. “The interception of the Pakistani boat has been caught in a bureaucratic crossfire,” said Mohan Guruswamy, a strategic affairs expert. “It was a terror boat heading most likely for the Gujarat port of Porbandar, where a new naval base is being set up. The coastguard was quick to take action but, due to inter-agency rivalries, the intelligence agencies are trying to discredit the operation.”
“The navy felt it was just a case of a small-time smuggler’s boat, but the coast guard perhaps wanted to paint a success and went ahead with the operation,” said defence analyst Ajai Shukla. After the fishing-boat incident, Modi cancelled his visit to Porbandar to inaugurate work on the naval base and the Indian navy has called off the function citing the terrorist threat.
The coastguard hasn’t painted itself in flying colours after the sinking of the boat. The interceptor ship returned to base without collecting any debris from the Pakistani boat for naval forensic experts to establish what the cargo was and why the boat caught fire. The coastguard has emerged badly from the incident. Its interceptor ship returned to base without collecting any debris from the Pakistani boat, which would have allowed naval forensic experts to establish what the boat’s cargo was.
The local coastguard commander’s press conference after the incident didn’t inspire much confidence either. “The men on the boat nowhere looked like fishermen. They were wearing T-shirts and shorts,” he said. He couldn’t quite clarify if terrorists could be identified by their dress. As a result the mystery of the burning Pakistani boat may never be resolved. “Who knows the story behind the story,” said Ajai Shukla, a noted defence analyst and former army officer. “We may never discover the truth. But as it stands, the coastguard’s story of the high seas encounter doesn’t stand scrutiny. This is strictly my military opinion.”
Islamabad has shown admirable restraint in its response to the incident. It has maintained that so far no Pakistani boat has been reported missing. India’s defence minister Manohar Parrikar has also been cautious, complimenting the coastguard only for averting a “possible danger”. Islamabad has denied that a Pakistani boat was involved in the incident.
But Indian fishermen in Gujarat are worried. “I just hope the government clears up the mystery over this, because if any Pakistani fishermen have been killed the Pakistan navy will take vengeance on us,” the head of the Porbandar fishing boat owners’ association, Narsibhai Jungi Jadeja, told the Indian Express. But Indian fishermen in Gujarat are worried. “I just hope the government clears up the mystery, because if any Pakistani fishermen have been killed the Pakistan navy will take vengeance on us,” the head of the Porbandar fishing boat owners’ association, Narsibhai Jungi Jadeja, told the Indian Express.
But even if Islamabad and Delhi appear to be downplaying the high seas incident, the sinking of the Pakistani fishing boat has resulted in an all-out India-Pakistan war on Twitter.
The Indian chatterati seem fluffed by the new nationalist mood under Modi, while the Pakistanis remain scornful of Indian intentions.
“Who knows what is the story behind the story,” said Shukla, who is a former army officer. “We may never discover the truth. But as it stands, the coastguard’s story of the high seas encounter doesn’t stand scrutiny. This is strictly my military opinion.”