This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/business/7178766.stm

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Key test for bank overdraft fees Bank charges court test to open
(2 days later)
A High Court test case starts on Monday that could bring a fundamental change to High Street banking in the UK. Banks and their customers are awaiting the start of a High Court test case which could bring a fundamental change to UK High Street banking.
The outcome may decide the level of charges that banks are able to levy on millions of customers who go overdrawn without permission every year. The outcome may decide how much banks can charge millions of account holders who go overdrawn without permission.
The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) will challenge seven leading banks and the Nationwide building society. The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) is challenging seven leading retail banks and the Nationwide building society.
The regulator claims the banks' overdraft charges are unfair, but the banks say they are entirely legal.The regulator claims the banks' overdraft charges are unfair, but the banks say they are entirely legal.
"We have always believed that what we are doing is correct and legal," said a spokeswoman for the British Bankers' Association (BBA)."We have always believed that what we are doing is correct and legal," said a spokeswoman for the British Bankers' Association (BBA).
"We are confident and think the hearing is an important opportunity to bring some clarity to the legal position," she added."We are confident and think the hearing is an important opportunity to bring some clarity to the legal position," she added.
Angry customersAngry customers
The hearing is an attempt to resolve the legal issues at the heart of the unprecedented wave of mass litigation which swept the country during the past two years. The hearing on Monday is an attempt to resolve the legal issues at the heart of the unprecedented wave of mass litigation which swept the country during the past two years.
If the banks win then this gives them the green light to charge whatever they want Marc Gander, Consumer Action Group Q&A: Charges test caseIf the banks win then this gives them the green light to charge whatever they want Marc Gander, Consumer Action Group Q&A: Charges test case
Several hundred thousand bank customers are estimated to have won more than half a billion pounds in refunds from their banks in 2007 after accusing them, often in local court proceedings, of imposing excessive overdraft fees that were unfair and illegal.Several hundred thousand bank customers are estimated to have won more than half a billion pounds in refunds from their banks in 2007 after accusing them, often in local court proceedings, of imposing excessive overdraft fees that were unfair and illegal.
These fees can amount to more than £30 for going into the red or having a cheque bounced and in some cases customers have been refunded thousands of pounds each.These fees can amount to more than £30 for going into the red or having a cheque bounced and in some cases customers have been refunded thousands of pounds each.
"We are very hopeful the OFT will win," said Phil Jones of the consumer body Which?."We are very hopeful the OFT will win," said Phil Jones of the consumer body Which?.
"We think they have a strong case and so do consumers in the court of public opinion.""We think they have a strong case and so do consumers in the court of public opinion."
Legal argumentLegal argument
Initially the OFT will not ask the judge to make a straightforward ruling that the banks' charges are unfair.Initially the OFT will not ask the judge to make a straightforward ruling that the banks' charges are unfair.
At this stage we will not ask for a ruling on fairness OFT spokesmanAt this stage we will not ask for a ruling on fairness OFT spokesman
Instead the regulator will argue that the overdraft charges, which the banks have been restyling in their literature as "fees for a service", come under the scope of the 1999 Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations.Instead the regulator will argue that the overdraft charges, which the banks have been restyling in their literature as "fees for a service", come under the scope of the 1999 Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations.
The OFT says this gives it the authority to decide itself if the charges or fees are unfair, and also gives it the power to do something about it.The OFT says this gives it the authority to decide itself if the charges or fees are unfair, and also gives it the power to do something about it.
"This is all about seeing if the regulations apply," said an OFT spokesman."This is all about seeing if the regulations apply," said an OFT spokesman.
"At this stage we will not ask for a ruling on fairness," he added."At this stage we will not ask for a ruling on fairness," he added.
The regulator will also argue that the banks' terms and conditions are not written in sufficiently plain English, a factor which would also give the OFT jurisdiction over them.The regulator will also argue that the banks' terms and conditions are not written in sufficiently plain English, a factor which would also give the OFT jurisdiction over them.
For their part, the banks argue that their charges are a fee for a service and not a penalty charge, and also that they form a core term of their contracts with their customers.For their part, the banks argue that their charges are a fee for a service and not a penalty charge, and also that they form a core term of their contracts with their customers.
As such they say the consumer legislation simply does not apply.As such they say the consumer legislation simply does not apply.
CompensationCompensation
Since the announcement of the test case last summer the cases that had threatened to swamp county and district courts have largely died down.Since the announcement of the test case last summer the cases that had threatened to swamp county and district courts have largely died down.
This risks increased charges for people who remain in credit and possibly the withdrawal of banking services from unprofitable poorer customers Julian Skan, AccentureThis risks increased charges for people who remain in credit and possibly the withdrawal of banking services from unprofitable poorer customers Julian Skan, Accenture
The was a result of a general stay on new cases that has been upheld by judges at the request of the banks and the Financial Services Authority (FSA). This was a result of a general stay on new cases that has been upheld by judges at the request of the banks and the Financial Services Authority (FSA).
But if they lose the High Court argument, the banks will lose a source of income worth about £10m a day, according to OFT calculations.But if they lose the High Court argument, the banks will lose a source of income worth about £10m a day, according to OFT calculations.
They might also have to trawl back through the records of all their customers for the past six years to offer compensation to anyone who had been overcharged, a bill that would run to billions of pounds.They might also have to trawl back through the records of all their customers for the past six years to offer compensation to anyone who had been overcharged, a bill that would run to billions of pounds.
Marc Gander, of the leading campaign group the Consumer Action Group (CAG), said the outcome of the case would be extraordinarily important.Marc Gander, of the leading campaign group the Consumer Action Group (CAG), said the outcome of the case would be extraordinarily important.
"If the banks win then this gives them the green light to charge whatever they want or whatever the market will bear," he said."If the banks win then this gives them the green light to charge whatever they want or whatever the market will bear," he said.
The banks say that if they lose they could be forced to make up for lost income by levying new charges on other customers, bringing about the end of so-called "free banking" in the UK.The banks say that if they lose they could be forced to make up for lost income by levying new charges on other customers, bringing about the end of so-called "free banking" in the UK.
"This risks increased charges for people who remain in credit and possibly the withdrawal of banking services from unprofitable poorer customers, while seeing charges extended to many more people," said Julian Skan of the consultancy Accenture."This risks increased charges for people who remain in credit and possibly the withdrawal of banking services from unprofitable poorer customers, while seeing charges extended to many more people," said Julian Skan of the consultancy Accenture.
That view is disputed by Which?.That view is disputed by Which?.
"We don't accept free banking actually exists or that it would be acceptable for customers to face high extra account charges instead," said Phil Jones."We don't accept free banking actually exists or that it would be acceptable for customers to face high extra account charges instead," said Phil Jones.
Long delayLong delay
It is now two years since the huge consumer campaign against bank charges took off.It is now two years since the huge consumer campaign against bank charges took off.
But if the OFT wins, this will not automatically lead to compensation being paid to customers whose claims for refunds are currently stuck in the legal system, or who may belatedly realise they are owed money.But if the OFT wins, this will not automatically lead to compensation being paid to customers whose claims for refunds are currently stuck in the legal system, or who may belatedly realise they are owed money.
The issue of compensation, if any, will be dealt with by the FSA and the Financial Ombudsman Service.The issue of compensation, if any, will be dealt with by the FSA and the Financial Ombudsman Service.
The High Court hearing is expected to last eight days with a judgement being delivered by the court around Easter.The High Court hearing is expected to last eight days with a judgement being delivered by the court around Easter.
However, whichever side loses is highly likely to appeal, possibly all the way to the House of Lords, which means the issue may not be resolved until next year. However, whichever side loses is highly likely to appeal - possibly all the way to the House of Lords - which means the issue may not be resolved until next year.