This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/abortion-bill-dropped-amid-concerns-of-female-gop-lawmakers/2015/01/22/56ffafea-a24a-11e4-903f-9f2faf7cd9fe_story.html?wprss=rss_homepage

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
House Republicans pass watered-down antiabortion bill House Republicans pass watered-down antiabortion bill
(less than a minute earlier)
House Republicans passed a watered-down antiabortion bill Thursday after withdrawing a more restrictive measure that some female GOP lawmakers argued would hurt the party’s efforts to broaden its appeal to women and younger voters.House Republicans passed a watered-down antiabortion bill Thursday after withdrawing a more restrictive measure that some female GOP lawmakers argued would hurt the party’s efforts to broaden its appeal to women and younger voters.
The rebellion on the abortion bill, led by women and moderates, was an illustration of some of the new challenges the party faces as a result of its expanded majority in the House. The 246-member GOP caucus is now experiencing rifts that previously did not exist, and those divisions are largely being driven by concern among moderates that they could face tough reelection battles in 2016, when more Democratic and independent voters are expected to turn out for presidential election.The rebellion on the abortion bill, led by women and moderates, was an illustration of some of the new challenges the party faces as a result of its expanded majority in the House. The 246-member GOP caucus is now experiencing rifts that previously did not exist, and those divisions are largely being driven by concern among moderates that they could face tough reelection battles in 2016, when more Democratic and independent voters are expected to turn out for presidential election.
Already this month, a large bloc of moderate Republicans voted against a spending bill that would repeal President Obama’s changes to immigration policy enacted by executive action. More than two dozen Republicans from metro areas with large immigrant populations also voted against an amendment to the bill that would end temporary legal protections to the children of illegal immigrants.Already this month, a large bloc of moderate Republicans voted against a spending bill that would repeal President Obama’s changes to immigration policy enacted by executive action. More than two dozen Republicans from metro areas with large immigrant populations also voted against an amendment to the bill that would end temporary legal protections to the children of illegal immigrants.
On the abortion measure, as many as two dozen lawmakers, led by Reps. Renee L. Ellmers (R-N.C.) and Jackie Walorski (R-Ind.), raised concerns with Republican leaders about holding a vote on a restrictive abortion bill so early in the year.On the abortion measure, as many as two dozen lawmakers, led by Reps. Renee L. Ellmers (R-N.C.) and Jackie Walorski (R-Ind.), raised concerns with Republican leaders about holding a vote on a restrictive abortion bill so early in the year.
The “Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act” would ban abortions after the 20th week of a pregnancy. Sponsors said that exceptions would be allowed for a woman who is raped but that she could only get the abortion after reporting the rape to law enforcement.The “Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act” would ban abortions after the 20th week of a pregnancy. Sponsors said that exceptions would be allowed for a woman who is raped but that she could only get the abortion after reporting the rape to law enforcement.
A vote had been scheduled for Thursday to coincide with the annual March for Life, a gathering that brings thousands of antiabortion activists to Washington to mark the anniversary of the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion.A vote had been scheduled for Thursday to coincide with the annual March for Life, a gathering that brings thousands of antiabortion activists to Washington to mark the anniversary of the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion.
But Republican leaders dropped those plans after failing to win over the bloc of lawmakers. A similar version of the bill easily passed the GOP-controlled House in 2013 and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) had vowed to bring it up for a vote.But Republican leaders dropped those plans after failing to win over the bloc of lawmakers. A similar version of the bill easily passed the GOP-controlled House in 2013 and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) had vowed to bring it up for a vote.
Instead, the House voted 242 to 179 on Thursday to prohibit federal funding for abortions — a more innocuous antiabortion measure that the Republican-controlled chamber has passed before.Instead, the House voted 242 to 179 on Thursday to prohibit federal funding for abortions — a more innocuous antiabortion measure that the Republican-controlled chamber has passed before.
A senior GOP aide said that concerns had been raised “by men and women members that still need to be worked out.” The aide, who wasn’t authorized to speak publicly about the plans, said in an e-mail that Thursday’s vote will help “advance the pro-life cause” and that GOP leaders “remain committed to continue working through the process [on the Pain Capable bill] to make sure it, too, is successful.”A senior GOP aide said that concerns had been raised “by men and women members that still need to be worked out.” The aide, who wasn’t authorized to speak publicly about the plans, said in an e-mail that Thursday’s vote will help “advance the pro-life cause” and that GOP leaders “remain committed to continue working through the process [on the Pain Capable bill] to make sure it, too, is successful.”
Other aides said that leaders were eager to avoid political fallout from a large number of female Republicans voting against an abortion bill in the early stages of the new GOP-controlled Congress.Other aides said that leaders were eager to avoid political fallout from a large number of female Republicans voting against an abortion bill in the early stages of the new GOP-controlled Congress.
Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.), the bill’s lead sponsor, had predicted Wednesday that his proposal would easily pass because it “has overwhelming support among the American people.”Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.), the bill’s lead sponsor, had predicted Wednesday that his proposal would easily pass because it “has overwhelming support among the American people.”
Leaders of several conservative groups said Thursday that they will continue pressing GOP leaders to pass Franks’s bill.Leaders of several conservative groups said Thursday that they will continue pressing GOP leaders to pass Franks’s bill.
“The results of the 2014 midterm elections made clear that this Congress has been given a direct mandate to protect unborn children and their mothers from late-term abortion, stop taxpayer funding of abortion and defend conscience rights,” said the leaders of the Susan B. Anthony List, the March for Life Education and Defense Fund and the Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee.“The results of the 2014 midterm elections made clear that this Congress has been given a direct mandate to protect unborn children and their mothers from late-term abortion, stop taxpayer funding of abortion and defend conscience rights,” said the leaders of the Susan B. Anthony List, the March for Life Education and Defense Fund and the Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee.
But Ellmers and Walorski had withdrawn their support and voiced concerns during the annual Republican policy retreat in Hershey, Pa., last week. Ellmers did so again Wednesday at a closed-door House GOP meeting in the basement of the Capitol, according to several people who attended.But Ellmers and Walorski had withdrawn their support and voiced concerns during the annual Republican policy retreat in Hershey, Pa., last week. Ellmers did so again Wednesday at a closed-door House GOP meeting in the basement of the Capitol, according to several people who attended.
Seeking to rebut growing criticism from conservatives, Ellmers said on Facebook Wednesday evening that she would vote for the bill: “I have and will continue to be a strong defender of the prolife community,” she wrote. She had already drawn sharp rebukes on the popular conservative blog Red State, which had a headline: “Renee Ellmers is Worse Than a Democrat.”Seeking to rebut growing criticism from conservatives, Ellmers said on Facebook Wednesday evening that she would vote for the bill: “I have and will continue to be a strong defender of the prolife community,” she wrote. She had already drawn sharp rebukes on the popular conservative blog Red State, which had a headline: “Renee Ellmers is Worse Than a Democrat.”
She had recently asked leaders to reconsider holding the vote, noting that Republicans had faced harsh criticism from Democrats in recent years for mounting a “war on women” by passing restrictive abortion legislation and other similar bills.She had recently asked leaders to reconsider holding the vote, noting that Republicans had faced harsh criticism from Democrats in recent years for mounting a “war on women” by passing restrictive abortion legislation and other similar bills.
“The first vote we take, or the second vote, or the fifth vote, shouldn’t be on an issue where we know that millennials — social issues just aren’t as important” to them, she said in an interview with National Journal.“The first vote we take, or the second vote, or the fifth vote, shouldn’t be on an issue where we know that millennials — social issues just aren’t as important” to them, she said in an interview with National Journal.
With word of the opposition spreading, Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) conferred nervously off the House floor after a midday vote. From there, Scalise headed to a meeting in his office suite with Ellmers, Walorski, Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) — a lead co-sponsor of the bill — and several other women.With word of the opposition spreading, Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) conferred nervously off the House floor after a midday vote. From there, Scalise headed to a meeting in his office suite with Ellmers, Walorski, Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) — a lead co-sponsor of the bill — and several other women.
In a caucus dominated by men, a meeting with top leaders requested and attended almost exclusively by women is a rare sight. One by one they exited the meeting and remained tight-lipped.In a caucus dominated by men, a meeting with top leaders requested and attended almost exclusively by women is a rare sight. One by one they exited the meeting and remained tight-lipped.
Walorski said the dispute “is no different” than conversations that occur before votes on other legislation. When pressed to explain her specific concerns, she rushed off: “I can’t. I can’t.”Walorski said the dispute “is no different” than conversations that occur before votes on other legislation. When pressed to explain her specific concerns, she rushed off: “I can’t. I can’t.”
Others seen exiting included Reps. Kristi L. Noem (R-S.D.), Diane Black (R-Tenn.), Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-Wash.), Vicky Hartzler (R-Mo.), Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), Barbara Comstock (R-Va.), Susan Brooks (R-Ind.) and Ann Wagner (R-Mo.). Hartzler had already signaled her support for the bill to reporters. The other women declined to comment.Others seen exiting included Reps. Kristi L. Noem (R-S.D.), Diane Black (R-Tenn.), Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-Wash.), Vicky Hartzler (R-Mo.), Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), Barbara Comstock (R-Va.), Susan Brooks (R-Ind.) and Ann Wagner (R-Mo.). Hartzler had already signaled her support for the bill to reporters. The other women declined to comment.
The impasse prompted Tony Perkins, who leads the conservative Family Research Council, to visit the Capitol on Wednesday to meet with Scalise.The impasse prompted Tony Perkins, who leads the conservative Family Research Council, to visit the Capitol on Wednesday to meet with Scalise.
He cited “a lot of misconceptions” for causing last-minute disputes with the bill. “We’re talking about a measure that would limit abortions after five months,” he said. “America is only one of four nations that allows abortions throughout the entire pregnancy.”He cited “a lot of misconceptions” for causing last-minute disputes with the bill. “We’re talking about a measure that would limit abortions after five months,” he said. “America is only one of four nations that allows abortions throughout the entire pregnancy.”
Women’s rights groups and Democrats have denounced the legislation as dangerous and unconstitutional. In a message to group members, the National Organization for Women cited federal statistics showing that just 35 percent of rape victims report the incident to police — and said that the bill would do nothing to increase the rate of reporting.Women’s rights groups and Democrats have denounced the legislation as dangerous and unconstitutional. In a message to group members, the National Organization for Women cited federal statistics showing that just 35 percent of rape victims report the incident to police — and said that the bill would do nothing to increase the rate of reporting.
Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, cheered the decision of GOP leaders.Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, cheered the decision of GOP leaders.
“I never thought I would see the day that the tea-party-led House of Representatives would wake up to the fact that their priorities — outright abortion bans — are way out of touch with the American people,” she said in a statement. “The GOP drafted a bill so extreme and so out of touch with the voters that even their own membership could not support.”“I never thought I would see the day that the tea-party-led House of Representatives would wake up to the fact that their priorities — outright abortion bans — are way out of touch with the American people,” she said in a statement. “The GOP drafted a bill so extreme and so out of touch with the voters that even their own membership could not support.”
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told reporters Thursday morning that she “didn’t know what to make” of the GOP revolt, but she said that the other abortion bill slated for a vote is more troubling than the one that was scuttled.House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told reporters Thursday morning that she “didn’t know what to make” of the GOP revolt, but she said that the other abortion bill slated for a vote is more troubling than the one that was scuttled.
“I don’t know if that was about politics, but in terms of policy, what they are bringing to the floor now is worse,” she said.“I don’t know if that was about politics, but in terms of policy, what they are bringing to the floor now is worse,” she said.
Pelosi said she was confident Democrats would sustain a presidential veto if the bill passes Congress.Pelosi said she was confident Democrats would sustain a presidential veto if the bill passes Congress.
The 22 women in the House GOP caucus are well aware that many of their male colleagues have earned the ire of Democrats and women’s rights groups for talking about rape and women’s rights.The 22 women in the House GOP caucus are well aware that many of their male colleagues have earned the ire of Democrats and women’s rights groups for talking about rape and women’s rights.
At the same closed-door retreat two years ago, Republican pollsters implored GOP lawmakers to stop discussing rape on the campaign trail and on Capitol Hill. The warnings came after several candidates faced heat in 2012 — including former congressman Todd Akin (R-Mo.), who said a woman could terminate a pregnancy resulting from a “legitimate rape,” and Richard Mourdock, a GOP candidate for an Indiana Senate seat, who said that babies resulting from rape were a “gift from God.”At the same closed-door retreat two years ago, Republican pollsters implored GOP lawmakers to stop discussing rape on the campaign trail and on Capitol Hill. The warnings came after several candidates faced heat in 2012 — including former congressman Todd Akin (R-Mo.), who said a woman could terminate a pregnancy resulting from a “legitimate rape,” and Richard Mourdock, a GOP candidate for an Indiana Senate seat, who said that babies resulting from rape were a “gift from God.”
Franks, who is an ardent antiabortion activist, has been known to take an aggressive stance on the issue in the past, often clashing with Democrats opposed to his proposals. But on Wednesday, he took a notably softer tone as he acknowledged the concerns of his colleagues.Franks, who is an ardent antiabortion activist, has been known to take an aggressive stance on the issue in the past, often clashing with Democrats opposed to his proposals. But on Wednesday, he took a notably softer tone as he acknowledged the concerns of his colleagues.
“I’ve maintained an open heart, because I realize that all of the people involved have sincere perspectives and have knowledge and experiences and information that I don’t have,” Franks said. “So my heart is open. My desire here is not a political victory; it is to try to somehow be part of catalyzing an awakening in America to where we finally see the humanity of these little victims and the inhumanity of what’s happening to them.”“I’ve maintained an open heart, because I realize that all of the people involved have sincere perspectives and have knowledge and experiences and information that I don’t have,” Franks said. “So my heart is open. My desire here is not a political victory; it is to try to somehow be part of catalyzing an awakening in America to where we finally see the humanity of these little victims and the inhumanity of what’s happening to them.”
Sean Sullivan contributed to this report.Sean Sullivan contributed to this report.