This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jan/27/jeffrey-epstein-condemns-media-first-formal-comments
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein condemns media in first formal comments on new allegations | Jeffrey Epstein condemns media in first formal comments on new allegations |
| (about 1 hour later) | |
| Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender accused of forcing a 17-year-old girl to have sex with his friend Prince Andrew, has struck out at the press in his first formal statement since the reigniting of the scandal around his alleged crimes. | Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender accused of forcing a 17-year-old girl to have sex with his friend Prince Andrew, has struck out at the press in his first formal statement since the reigniting of the scandal around his alleged crimes. |
| Epstein, a wealthy former banker, complained in a court filing about what he called “the gossip media”, alleging that attorneys for his accusers were trying to satisfy a “craving for what is sensational or scandalous” among journalists. | Epstein, a wealthy former banker, complained in a court filing about what he called “the gossip media”, alleging that attorneys for his accusers were trying to satisfy a “craving for what is sensational or scandalous” among journalists. |
| Condemning the “media frenzy” surrounding his case, the filing said that Epstein and several of his associates “have been the subject of the most outlandish and offensive attacks, allegations, and plain inventions”. | Condemning the “media frenzy” surrounding his case, the filing said that Epstein and several of his associates “have been the subject of the most outlandish and offensive attacks, allegations, and plain inventions”. |
| The 62-year-old was jailed in 2008 for soliciting prostitution from a minor, following an FBI inquiry that identified dozens of victims of alleged underaged sex abuse. One accuser, Virginia Roberts, alleged in a US court last month that she was made to sleep with Andrew when she was 17. Andrew and Buckingham Palace strenuously deny her accusation. | The 62-year-old was jailed in 2008 for soliciting prostitution from a minor, following an FBI inquiry that identified dozens of victims of alleged underaged sex abuse. One accuser, Virginia Roberts, alleged in a US court last month that she was made to sleep with Andrew when she was 17. Andrew and Buckingham Palace strenuously deny her accusation. |
| In a filing to the court in Florida through his lawyers late on Monday, Epstein pleaded with Judge Kenneth Marra to block the release of the thousands of pages in correspondence between Epstein’s legal team and US government prosecutors that led to his plea deal, which has been criticised as overly lenient. | In a filing to the court in Florida through his lawyers late on Monday, Epstein pleaded with Judge Kenneth Marra to block the release of the thousands of pages in correspondence between Epstein’s legal team and US government prosecutors that led to his plea deal, which has been criticised as overly lenient. |
| Related: Jeffrey Epstein: inside the decade of scandal entangling Prince Andrew | Related: Jeffrey Epstein: inside the decade of scandal entangling Prince Andrew |
| Roberts’ attorneys have alleged that high-powered allies of Epstein – who counted presidents, politicians and other wealthy celebrities among his friends – may have helped him to secure the agreement, which saw him spend 13 months in jail and promised immunity from prosecution for his “potential co-conspirators”. | Roberts’ attorneys have alleged that high-powered allies of Epstein – who counted presidents, politicians and other wealthy celebrities among his friends – may have helped him to secure the agreement, which saw him spend 13 months in jail and promised immunity from prosecution for his “potential co-conspirators”. |
| Arguing that such negotiations are traditionally kept secret, Epstein’s lawyers said in the new filing that he could be “irreparably harmed” if letters and other exchanges were placed in the public record before “making their way around the world on the internet in minutes”. | Arguing that such negotiations are traditionally kept secret, Epstein’s lawyers said in the new filing that he could be “irreparably harmed” if letters and other exchanges were placed in the public record before “making their way around the world on the internet in minutes”. |
| Such letters from lawyers “often necessarily involve explicit or implicit admissions regarding their client’s conduct”, Epstein’s attorneys wrote. | Such letters from lawyers “often necessarily involve explicit or implicit admissions regarding their client’s conduct”, Epstein’s attorneys wrote. |
| To argue that the law was on their side, they cited a 1978 US supreme court ruling in favour of former president Richard Nixon’s effort to deny television networks access to his secret White House recordings following his resignation over the Watergate scandal. | To argue that the law was on their side, they cited a 1978 US supreme court ruling in favour of former president Richard Nixon’s effort to deny television networks access to his secret White House recordings following his resignation over the Watergate scandal. |
| The ruling stated that the public’s ordinary access to all material filed to court, as the Nixon recordings had been, may be blocked if they “become a vehicle for improper purposes” or “to gratify private spite or promote public scandal”. | |
| Epstein’s attorneys said in their submission on Monday that they suspected that exchanges between his lawyers and prosecutors would be dumped into court record by Roberts’ lawyers “simply to make them available to the gossip media”. | Epstein’s attorneys said in their submission on Monday that they suspected that exchanges between his lawyers and prosecutors would be dumped into court record by Roberts’ lawyers “simply to make them available to the gossip media”. |
| They alleged that a previous reference in court by Roberts’ lawyers to a letter from Epstein’s team to prosecutors “was done for press consumption, to satisfy a craving for what is sensational or scandalous”. | They alleged that a previous reference in court by Roberts’ lawyers to a letter from Epstein’s team to prosecutors “was done for press consumption, to satisfy a craving for what is sensational or scandalous”. |
| A decision by Judge Marra to allow the letters to be made public could lead lawyers to censor themselves during plea negotiations “to avoid making statements that could later come back to haunt their clients in TMZ, the National Enquirer or the grocery store tabloids”, said Epstein’s attorneys. | A decision by Judge Marra to allow the letters to be made public could lead lawyers to censor themselves during plea negotiations “to avoid making statements that could later come back to haunt their clients in TMZ, the National Enquirer or the grocery store tabloids”, said Epstein’s attorneys. |
| Buckingham Palace has described Roberts’ allegations as “categorically untrue” and strenuously denied “any form of sexual contact or relationship” between her and Andrew. The Palace added: “The allegations made are false and without any foundation.” | Buckingham Palace has described Roberts’ allegations as “categorically untrue” and strenuously denied “any form of sexual contact or relationship” between her and Andrew. The Palace added: “The allegations made are false and without any foundation.” |
| Epstein won a court ruling last year that general access to the correspondence should be limited to lawyers and court officials. However, Roberts’ attorneys argue that they should be allowed to reference the material in future filings. | |
| Earlier this month Judge Marra told the former banker that he must set out “the extraordinary circumstances or particularised needs” that meant the correspondence should be kept sealed. | Earlier this month Judge Marra told the former banker that he must set out “the extraordinary circumstances or particularised needs” that meant the correspondence should be kept sealed. |
| “Public policy favours judicial records being open to the public,” Marra wrote. | “Public policy favours judicial records being open to the public,” Marra wrote. |