This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/28/us-supreme-court-blocks-oklahoma-execution-drug-midazolam
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
US supreme court blocks Oklahoma from using controversial execution drug | |
(4 months later) | |
The US supreme court on Wednesday agreed to temporarily block the execution of three Oklahoma prisoners who are challenging the state’s lethal injection procedure. | |
The court’s action means that convicted killers Richard Glossip, John Grant and Benjamin Cole will not be put to death using the sedative they object to until after the supreme court decides whether the procedure violates the US constitution’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. | |
The court’s brief order leaves open the possibility that the state could try to proceed with the executions using a different combination of drugs. | |
Last week, the court agreed to hear the case, which is set to be decided by the end of June, but did not block the inmates’ death sentences at that time. | |
The three-drug process used by Oklahoma prison officials has been under scrutiny since the April 2014 botched execution of convicted murderer Clayton Lockett. He could be seen twisting on the gurney after death chamber staff failed to place the IV properly. | |
The inmates challenging the state’s procedures argue the sedative used by Oklahoma, midazolam, cannot achieve the level of unconsciousness required for surgery, making it unsuitable for executions. | |
Glossip, who arranged for his employer to be beaten to death, was scheduled to be executed on Thursday. Grant, who stabbed a correctional worker to death, was due to be executed on 19 February. Cole, convicted of killing his nine-month-old daughter, was scheduled for execution on 5 March. | |
On 15 January, the supreme court on a 5-4 vote declined to halt Oklahoma’s execution of Charles Warner, convicted of raping and murdering an 11-month-old baby. Warner had raised the same legal question as the other inmates. | |
The court’s apparently contradictory acts indicate divisions between its five conservative and four liberal justices. Although five votes are needed to grant a stay application, only four are required for the court to take up a case. |
Previous version
1
Next version