This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/6098518.stm

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Police merger payouts criticised Police merger payouts criticised
(3 days later)
The Home Office will repay £4m of the £6.5m police forces in England and Wales claim they spent preparing for the mergers abandoned in July.The Home Office will repay £4m of the £6.5m police forces in England and Wales claim they spent preparing for the mergers abandoned in July.
The low pay-out was "regrettable", the Association of Police Authorities said.The low pay-out was "regrettable", the Association of Police Authorities said.
Forces losing out include Surrey, which claimed £649,000, and Sussex, which claimed £519,000. Both get £100,000.Forces losing out include Surrey, which claimed £649,000, and Sussex, which claimed £519,000. Both get £100,000.
The Conservatives said the whole plan had been "folly" which wasted money intended for frontline policing. Lib Dems called it a "slap in the face".The Conservatives said the whole plan had been "folly" which wasted money intended for frontline policing. Lib Dems called it a "slap in the face".
Policing minister Tony McNulty said that in deciding the amounts given to the different forces "consideration has been given to the need to treat all forces fairly given the wide disparity in the amounts claimed".Policing minister Tony McNulty said that in deciding the amounts given to the different forces "consideration has been given to the need to treat all forces fairly given the wide disparity in the amounts claimed".
'Staggering waste''Staggering waste'
The minister said "other factors" included affordability of the total amount due to be paid, and where costs had been incurred in response to specific requests by the Home Office.The minister said "other factors" included affordability of the total amount due to be paid, and where costs had been incurred in response to specific requests by the Home Office.
In all but four cases the amount being paid is to be capped at £100,000 per force.In all but four cases the amount being paid is to be capped at £100,000 per force.
FORCE-BY-FORCE PAYOUTS Bedfordshire: £23,430Cambridgeshire: £100,000 (claimed £242,000)Cheshire: £100,000 (£339,767)Cleveland: £100,000 (£189,986)Cumbria: £271,000Derbyshire: £35,782 (£58,469)Dorset: £140,836Durham: £67,155Dyfed-Powys: £100,000 (£225,891)Essex: £100,000 (£169,870)GMP: £75,810Gwent: £96,467Hampshire: £11,495Hertfordshire: £100,000 (£144,327)Humberside: £100,000 (£119,730)Kent: £100,000 (£152,042)Lancashire: £725,000Leicestershire: £37,232Lincolnshire: £287,600Merseyside: £100,000 (£266,357)Norfolk: £100,000 (£135,729)North Wales: £100,000 (£245,020)North Yorkshire: £100,00 (£167,808)Northamptonshire: £85,800Northumbria: £38,021Notts: £46,200South Wales: £100,000 (£326,944)South Yorks: £30,652Staffs: £56,317Suffolk: £45,483Surrey: £100,000 (£649,311)Sussex: £100,000 (£519,879)Thames Valley: £33,860Warwickshire: £100,000 (£174,608)West Mercia: £89,061West Mids: £100,000 (£117,591)West Yorks: £100,000 (£104,569) Where only one figure is given, the full amount claimed is being paid FORCE-BY-FORCE PAYOUTS Bedfordshire: £23,430 Cambridgeshire: £100,000 (claimed £242,000) Cheshire: £100,000 (£339,767) Cleveland: £100,000 (£189,986) Cumbria: £271,000 Derbyshire: £35,782 (£58,469) Dorset: £140,836 Durham: £67,155 Dyfed-Powys: £100,000 (£225,891) Essex: £100,000 (£169,870) GMP: £75,810 Gwent: £96,467 Hampshire: £11,495 Hertfordshire: £100,000 (£144,327) Humberside: £100,000 (£119,730) Kent: £100,000 (£152,042) Lancashire: £725,000 Leicestershire: £37,232 Lincolnshire: £287,600 Merseyside: £100,000 (£266,357) Norfolk: £100,000 (£135,729) North Wales: £100,000 (£245,020) North Yorkshire: £100,00 (£167,808) Northamptonshire: £85,800 Northumbria: £38,021 Notts: £46,200 South Wales: £100,000 (£326,944) South Yorks: £30,652 Staffs: £56,317 Suffolk: £45,483 Surrey: £100,000 (£649,311) Sussex: £100,000 (£519,879) Thames Valley: £33,860 Warwickshire: £100,000 (£174,608) West Mercia: £89,061 West Mids: £100,000 (£117,591) West Yorks: £100,000 (£104,569) Where only one figure is given, the full amount claimed is being paid
As well as Sussex and Surrey, there are losses of more than £100,000 for the Cambridgeshire, Cheshire, Dyfed-Powys, Merseyside, North Wales and South Wales forces.As well as Sussex and Surrey, there are losses of more than £100,000 for the Cambridgeshire, Cheshire, Dyfed-Powys, Merseyside, North Wales and South Wales forces.
There are exceptions to the £100,000 cap for Lancashire and Cumbria police authorities because they were selected to become the first merged force.There are exceptions to the £100,000 cap for Lancashire and Cumbria police authorities because they were selected to become the first merged force.
Lancashire will be paid its full amount of £750,000 and Cumbria will get £271,000.Lancashire will be paid its full amount of £750,000 and Cumbria will get £271,000.
Lincolnshire police authority will be reimbursed £287,600 because of work done on Home Office advice, he said, and Dorset will receive £140,000 because its bid took account of work done on behalf of four other forces.Lincolnshire police authority will be reimbursed £287,600 because of work done on Home Office advice, he said, and Dorset will receive £140,000 because its bid took account of work done on behalf of four other forces.
The chairman of the Association of Police Authorities, Bob Jones, said the failure to reimburse all the money claimed was "regrettable".The chairman of the Association of Police Authorities, Bob Jones, said the failure to reimburse all the money claimed was "regrettable".
"After all, the money police authorities spent was money that would otherwise have been spent on improving local policing for local communities," he said."After all, the money police authorities spent was money that would otherwise have been spent on improving local policing for local communities," he said.
Shadow home secretary David Davis said: "This shows the folly of the government's attempts to force regionalisation on our police forces.Shadow home secretary David Davis said: "This shows the folly of the government's attempts to force regionalisation on our police forces.
"The Home Office is refunding just two-thirds of what police authorities were forced to spend to prepare for amalgamations, and presumably this money will be robbed from the police budget anyway."The Home Office is refunding just two-thirds of what police authorities were forced to spend to prepare for amalgamations, and presumably this money will be robbed from the police budget anyway.
"Millions of pounds which should have been used to support frontline policing have been wasted.""Millions of pounds which should have been used to support frontline policing have been wasted."
The Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, Nick Clegg, said it was "a slap in the face for taxpayers and the police alike... millions of pounds have been spent on this unnecessary, harebrained scheme".The Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, Nick Clegg, said it was "a slap in the face for taxpayers and the police alike... millions of pounds have been spent on this unnecessary, harebrained scheme".
But the Home Office said the work carried out in preparation for the mergers would stand forces in good stead.But the Home Office said the work carried out in preparation for the mergers would stand forces in good stead.
Prime Minister Tony Blair has previously said the mergers were "not off the agenda" and that greater strategic co-operation between forces was needed.Prime Minister Tony Blair has previously said the mergers were "not off the agenda" and that greater strategic co-operation between forces was needed.