This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/feb/17/plain-cigarette-packaging-can-deter-take-up-of-smoking-studies-suggest

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Sorry - this page has been removed. Plain cigarette packaging can deter the take-up of smoking, studies suggest
(4 months later)
This could be because it launched early, our rights have expired, there was a legal issue, or for another reason. Studies on the health impact of “plain” or standardised cigarette packs suggest they can deter non-smokers from taking up the habit and may cut the number of cigarettes smokers get through, scientists said on Tuesday.
In a collection of scientific papers in the journal Addiction, researchers said that while standardised packs were still too new to provide substantial evidence, studies so far showed they were likely to reduce smoking rates.
For further information, please contact: Britain plans before May to become the second country in the world to introduce non-branded, standardised packaging for cigarettes, after the government promised last month to pass legislation that would come into effect in 2016.
Australia introduced standardised packaging two years ago in the face of fierce opposition from the tobacco industry. Its law forced cigarettes to be sold in plain drab green packs with health warnings and images showing the damaging effects of smoking.
In the Addiction series of studies, researchers found that after Australia’s move in 2012, when plain packages were introduced and the health warnings and images on them were made larger, smoking in outdoor areas of cafes, bars and restaurants declined and fewer smokers left their packs visible on tables.
Another study found that removing brand imagery from packs increased the focus on health warnings among occasional smokers and adolescents just starting to smoke.
Robert West, editor-in-chief of the journal, said plain packaging’s effect on young potential smokers was likely to be the most important initial impact.
“Even if standardised packaging had no effect at all on current smokers and only stopped one in 20 young people from being lured into smoking (in the UK), it would save about 2,000 lives a year,” he told reporters at a briefing in London.
Tobacco firms have fought hard against the new law, saying standard packs infringe on intellectual property rights covering branding and will only increase counterfeiting and smuggling.
But Ann McNeill, a professor of tobacco addiction at King’s College London, said cigarette makers should note that if their product had been invented today, it would never have even reached the consumer market.
“For an addictive product that kills so many of its users, the tobacco industry should consider itself fortunate that ... it is allowed to sell its toxic products at all, let alone try to make them attractive through the packaging,” she said.