This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-31967019

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Osborne should spell out welfare cuts, says IFS Osborne should spell out welfare cuts, says IFS
(about 1 hour later)
Chancellor George Osborne needs to spell out exactly how he plans to cut £12bn from welfare spending, says the independent forecaster the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).Chancellor George Osborne needs to spell out exactly how he plans to cut £12bn from welfare spending, says the independent forecaster the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).
Only £2bn of these £12bn cuts have been outlined so far, said IFS director Paul Johnson, in response to the Budget.Only £2bn of these £12bn cuts have been outlined so far, said IFS director Paul Johnson, in response to the Budget.
Yet all the cuts are supposed to be in place by 2017-18, he said.Yet all the cuts are supposed to be in place by 2017-18, he said.
"It is time we knew more about what they might actually involve," Mr Johnson added."It is time we knew more about what they might actually involve," Mr Johnson added.
Spending cuts planned for 2016-17 and 2017-18 would be "twice the size of any year's cuts over this parliament", said Mr Johnson, if the £12bn of cuts already announced and the Chancellor's hoped-for £5bn of anti tax avoidance measures failed to materialise.Spending cuts planned for 2016-17 and 2017-18 would be "twice the size of any year's cuts over this parliament", said Mr Johnson, if the £12bn of cuts already announced and the Chancellor's hoped-for £5bn of anti tax avoidance measures failed to materialise.
But the IFS has been left "guessing" how these cuts are going to be achieved, said Mr Johnson, admitting that the lack of detail was "frustrating".But the IFS has been left "guessing" how these cuts are going to be achieved, said Mr Johnson, admitting that the lack of detail was "frustrating".
"You're going to have to do things like further big cuts in child benefit, or really substantial cuts to housing benefit or significant cuts to disability benefits," said Mr Johnson."You're going to have to do things like further big cuts in child benefit, or really substantial cuts to housing benefit or significant cuts to disability benefits," said Mr Johnson.
"He's announced about £2bn [of cuts] and we know nothing about where the further £10bn are coming from.""He's announced about £2bn [of cuts] and we know nothing about where the further £10bn are coming from."
In his Budget, Mr Osborne said spending cuts could reach £40bn by 2018-19 but then fall to £26bn in 2019-20.In his Budget, Mr Osborne said spending cuts could reach £40bn by 2018-19 but then fall to £26bn in 2019-20.
Help to Buy ISAsHelp to Buy ISAs
Mr Johnson warned that the new "Help to Buy" ISA [individual savings account] proposed by the chancellor could result in a temporary fall in first-time buyer activity in the housing market. The IFS warned that the new "Help to Buy" ISA [individual savings account] proposed by the chancellor could result in a temporary fall in first-time buyer activity in the housing market.
This is because would-be buyers may delay property purchases to make the most of government top-ups.This is because would-be buyers may delay property purchases to make the most of government top-ups.
Under the proposed scheme, the government will add £50 for every £200 saved towards a deposit in the ISA.Under the proposed scheme, the government will add £50 for every £200 saved towards a deposit in the ISA.
Mr Johnson also speculated that the scheme could have an inflationary effect on house prices.Mr Johnson also speculated that the scheme could have an inflationary effect on house prices.
Household incomesHousehold incomes
Commenting on the economic effect of the recession and the government's tax and benefit changes, Mr Johnson said UK households had experienced "the slowest recovery in incomes in modern history".Commenting on the economic effect of the recession and the government's tax and benefit changes, Mr Johnson said UK households had experienced "the slowest recovery in incomes in modern history".
While average household incomes have "just about" regained their pre-recession levels, the recovery had not been felt equally by all sections of society, he said.While average household incomes have "just about" regained their pre-recession levels, the recovery had not been felt equally by all sections of society, he said.
"Average incomes among pensioners have risen, among those of working age they have fallen, with especially big falls for those in their 20s," said Mr Johnson."Average incomes among pensioners have risen, among those of working age they have fallen, with especially big falls for those in their 20s," said Mr Johnson.
Earnings, taking the effect of inflation into account, have fallen, but should still be above their 2010 levels, he continued.Earnings, taking the effect of inflation into account, have fallen, but should still be above their 2010 levels, he continued.
"We are for sure much worse off on average than we could reasonably have expected to be back in 2007 or indeed back in 2010," he said."We are for sure much worse off on average than we could reasonably have expected to be back in 2007 or indeed back in 2010," he said.
The IFS concluded that the richest have been "hit hardest" by the government's tax changes over the last parliament.The IFS concluded that the richest have been "hit hardest" by the government's tax changes over the last parliament.
But it said that benefit cuts had "hit low income working age people".But it said that benefit cuts had "hit low income working age people".