This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/west_yorkshire/7216895.stm

The article has changed 17 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Lords issue landmark abuse ruling Lords issue landmark abuse ruling
(40 minutes later)
Victims of sexual abuse may be able to sue their attackers many years later after a landmark ruling by Law Lords.Victims of sexual abuse may be able to sue their attackers many years later after a landmark ruling by Law Lords.
They ruled a convicted rapist who later won £7m on the National Lottery could be sued by his victim - even though her claim was outside a six-year deadline.They ruled a convicted rapist who later won £7m on the National Lottery could be sued by his victim - even though her claim was outside a six-year deadline.
Iorworth Hoare, 53, was jailed for life in May 1989 for the attempted rape of the 59-year-old woman, Mrs A, in Leeds.Iorworth Hoare, 53, was jailed for life in May 1989 for the attempted rape of the 59-year-old woman, Mrs A, in Leeds.
Four other historical abuse appeals also succeeded and the decision could allow other victims to sue attackers. Four other historical abuse appeals also succeeded and the decision could allow more victims to sue attackers.
A fair trial can be possible long after the event and sometimes the law has no choice Baroness Hale
Until now sexual abuse victims have been prevented from bringing a claim more than six years after an attack or, in child abuse cases, more than six years after the victim reaches 18.Until now sexual abuse victims have been prevented from bringing a claim more than six years after an attack or, in child abuse cases, more than six years after the victim reaches 18.
The Law Lords ruling now means all five appeal cases will be sent back to the High Court, where judges will decide whether or not to hear the abuse compensation cases. The Law Lords ruling now means all five appeal cases - some involving children - will be sent back to the High Court, where judges will decide whether or not to hear the abuse compensation cases.
Luxury lifestyle Baroness Hale said it was important the legal system responded to the challenges posed by historical sexual abuse claims.
In a statement released through her solicitor, Mrs A said: "I am both delighted and relieved that I have succeeded in changing the law which will provide others in the future with the hope of achieving justice. "A fair trial can be possible long after the event and sometimes the law has no choice," she said.
"It was this, rather than financial gain, that led me to begin this process two years ago." 'Delighted and relieved'
Mrs A received just £5,000 from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board after the attack in February 1988. Before being jailed for life for his attack on Mrs A, Hoare, known as the Lotto rapist, was jailed several times for a string of sex attacks, including rape, two attempted rapes and three indecent assaults, during the 1970s and 1980s.
Hoare was also jailed several times for a string of sex attacks, including rape, two attempted rapes and three indecent assaults, during the 1970s and 1980s. He now lives in a £700,000 mansion in Ponteland, Northumberland after winning a share a £21m Lotto Extra jackpot on 7 August 2004.
He now lives in a £700,000 mansion in Ponteland, Northumberland after he was one of three winners to share a £21m Lotto Extra jackpot on 7 August 2004. In 2005, a High Court judge ruled a compensation claim by Mrs A was outside the legal six-year limit and the Appeal Court later upheld that decision.
He bought the lottery ticket while on day release from jail. The Law Lords have now reversed that ruling, allowing her case to be reheard at the High Court.
Ruling welcomed In a statement released through her solicitor, Mrs A said: "I'm both delighted and relieved that my appeal to the House of Lords has been successful and that I've succeeded in changing a law which will provide others in the future with a means of achieving justice.
In 2005, a High Court judge ruled a compensation claim by Mrs A was outside the legal six-year limit. The Appeal Court upheld that decision. "It was this rather than financial gain which motivated me to begin this process two years ago."
Victim Support welcomed the ruling but said it would help only a small number of people. 'Empowering'
The four other appeal cases included a claimant who was sexual abused between 1982 and 1988 at a school managed by Middlesbrough Council when he was aged between 10 and 16.
The judge hearing the case said the victim, known as C, would have been entitled to almost £100,000 in damages, but could not claim because it was outside the legal time period - as covered by the Limitation Act.
But Lord Hoffmann said Section 33 of the act did give judges the right to extend the time limit when they believed it was right to do so.
It's very good news for her [Mrs A] but the wider significance is questionable because the vast majority of offenders don't have assets to chase Paul FawcettVictim Support
David Greenwood of Jordans Solicitors, which represents victims of child abuse, said the Lords' decision would "empower" people to come forward to make compensation claims.
"Victims often feel scared to come forward. Most come forward only after prompting through police investigations," he said.
"Victims of sexual and physical abuse in care establishments can now be confident that even after many years they will be treated seriously and sympathetically by lawyers and the courts."
Victim Support also welcomed the ruling but said it would help only a small number of people.
Spokesman Paul Fawcett said: "It's very good news for her but the wider significance is questionable because the vast majority of offenders don't have assets to chase.Spokesman Paul Fawcett said: "It's very good news for her but the wider significance is questionable because the vast majority of offenders don't have assets to chase.
"We have long campaigned for a public fund to allow the courts to award compensation, leaving it to the courts to recover assets from the offender and allowing the victim to walk away and put the crime behind them.""We have long campaigned for a public fund to allow the courts to award compensation, leaving it to the courts to recover assets from the offender and allowing the victim to walk away and put the crime behind them."