This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/31/nigerian-opposition-election-lead-goodluck-government-cries-foul

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Nigerian opposition candidate leads in election as governing party cries foul Nigerian opposition candidate edges closer to victory as governing party cries foul
(35 minutes later)
The second day of vote counting in Nigeria’s tight election got off to a dramatic start on Tuesday when a member of the governing party disrupted proceedings to accuse the electoral chief of bias. Nigeria’s opposition candidate appeared to be edging towards victory on Tuesday in an election followed closely in Africa and around the world.
Half the 36 states in Nigeria have so far declared returns in the contest between President Goodluck Jonathan and former military ruler Muhammadu Buhari, with the challenger leading in an election followed closely in Africa and around the world. With 25 of Nigeria’s states, plus the capital, declaring results former military ruler Muhammadu Buhari was leading the incumbent, Goodluck Jonathan, by 10,454,137 votes to 9,953,432, according to official results.
Tensions have mounted as both voting and the collation of results had to be extended by a day each. Buhari, 72, has campaigned as a born-again democrat intent on cleaning up the corrupt politics of the continent’s biggest economy and most populous nation.
Godsday Orubebe, a former minister and a member of the ruling People’s Democratic party (PDP), currently trailing by almost two million votes, seized the microphone at the count and launched into an attack on the electoral chief. Tensions have mounted as both voting and the collation of results had to be extended by a day each. Jonathan faces the prospect of being Nigeria’s first incumbent president to lose an election.
The second day of vote-counting got off to a dramatic start on Tuesday when a member of Jonathan’s party accused the electoral chief of bias.
Godsday Orubebe, a former minister and a member of the ruling People’s Democratic party (PDP) seized the microphone at the count on Tuesday morning and launched into an attack on the electoral chief.
“Mr chairman, we have lost confidence in you and what you’re doing. You’re not impartial, you’re compromised,” he said as Attahiru Jega, the electoral chief, apologised for the delay in announcing results.“Mr chairman, we have lost confidence in you and what you’re doing. You’re not impartial, you’re compromised,” he said as Attahiru Jega, the electoral chief, apologised for the delay in announcing results.
Related: Nigeria faces an acid test, whatever the result of this election | Max Siollun
Orubebe later walked to the podium where an impassive Jega looked on and continued screaming for 10 minutes, waving a sheet of results as a crowd gathered around him. He also accused him of prioritising the announcement of northern states, which are Buhari strongholds.Orubebe later walked to the podium where an impassive Jega looked on and continued screaming for 10 minutes, waving a sheet of results as a crowd gathered around him. He also accused him of prioritising the announcement of northern states, which are Buhari strongholds.
Orubebe was a former minister of Rivers state, a key battleground in the volatile Niger delta, which produces much of the country’s oil. Official results have not been announced but the state returned a 95% victory for Jonathan prompting the opposition to call for a recount.Orubebe was a former minister of Rivers state, a key battleground in the volatile Niger delta, which produces much of the country’s oil. Official results have not been announced but the state returned a 95% victory for Jonathan prompting the opposition to call for a recount.
“Let us not disrupt a process which has ended peacefully and which we will conclude in a few hours,” Jega said.“Let us not disrupt a process which has ended peacefully and which we will conclude in a few hours,” Jega said.
Buhari, a 72-year-old former army general, has campaigned as a born-again democrat intent on cleaning up the corrupt politics of the continent’s biggest economy and most populous nation. Voter turnout was consistently higher in Buhari’s strongholds than in Jonathan’s and he won by bigger margins than he achieved at the last election in 2011.
Related: Nigeria faces an acid test, whatever the result of this election | Max Siollun
He built an early lead on Monday in northern states dominated by the mainly Muslim Hausa-Fulani ethnic group, of which he is a member. Voter turnout was consistently higher in his strongholds than in Jonathan’s and he won by bigger margins than he achieved at the last election in 2011.
In Kano, the state containing Nigeria’s second biggest city, Buhari defeated Jonathan by nearly 1.7 million votes, compared with about one million last time around. In Kaduna, where the two were virtually tied in 2011, Buhari won by 650,000 votes.In Kano, the state containing Nigeria’s second biggest city, Buhari defeated Jonathan by nearly 1.7 million votes, compared with about one million last time around. In Kaduna, where the two were virtually tied in 2011, Buhari won by 650,000 votes.
So far, Buhari and his All Progressives Congress (APC) have won 10 states, with Jonathan taking eight plus the territory containing the capital, Abuja. Buhari stands on 8.5 million votes compared with Jonathan’s 6.48 million.
New African magazine said the results from 18 states so far, and its projections from the 18 remaining, suggest that Buhari has taken “a near unassailable lead” over Jonathan. “Turnout in strongly PDP Imo, in the south-east, halved from 84% in 2011 to 42% this year, while turnout in Abia, also in the south-east, was a mere 30% – 48 points shy of 2011’s total,” it added.
Even if Jonathan manages to replicate the vast scale, in absolute terms, of his 2011 victory in five of the six south-south states yet to declare results, he is unlikely to overcome Buhari’s lead in other parts of the country, according to New African projections.
The president, facing the prospect of becoming the first Nigerian incumbent to lose an election, will be hoping to claw back ground in his home region, the southern, oil-producing Niger Delta. Results from the commercial capital, Lagos, are also still to come.
The winning presidential candidate needs not only the most votes, but at least 25% support in two-thirds of Nigeria’s 36 states and Abuja to avoid a runoff.The winning presidential candidate needs not only the most votes, but at least 25% support in two-thirds of Nigeria’s 36 states and Abuja to avoid a runoff.
The PDP, which has dominated the west African nation’s politics since the end of military rule in 1999, said the early returns were no cause for concern. “The [PDP] is unperturbed by the results of the elections so far,” spokesman Olisa Metuh said. “The results from [PDP] strongholds will overwhelm those from the [north] and give it a clean and clear victory at the end of the day.”
But other voices in the party alleged irregularities and raised doubts over whether it would accept defeat. Wale Oladipo, the PDP national secretary, said its agents on the ground found evidence of “massive underage voting” as well as violence and intimidation. “I expect INEC [the electoral commission] to address this issue before rushing to announce the vote,” he told Channels television.
Femi Fani-Kayode, spokesman for the PDP presidential campaign, has warned of the result: “If it does not reflect the will of the Nigerian people, we shall resist it with everything that is available to us. That you can rest assured of.”
On Monday, the US and Britain warned against any interference with the count. “So far, we have seen no evidence of systemic manipulation of the process,” the US secretary of state, John Kerry, and his British counterpart, Philip Hammond, said in a joint statement. “But there are disturbing indications that the collation process – where the votes are finally counted – may be subject to deliberate political interference.”On Monday, the US and Britain warned against any interference with the count. “So far, we have seen no evidence of systemic manipulation of the process,” the US secretary of state, John Kerry, and his British counterpart, Philip Hammond, said in a joint statement. “But there are disturbing indications that the collation process – where the votes are finally counted – may be subject to deliberate political interference.”
Results from the rest of the country were expected from 10am local time on Tuesday but were running late. The logistics of transporting results from around the country to the national nerve centre Abuja have slowed the process. Prof Akin Oyebode, an academic, noted that Nigeria lacks high-speed trains while flights are often delayed. “We have to remember we are a third-world country, not a first-world country,” he told Channels. Results from the rest of the country were expected from 10am local time on Tuesday but were running late. The logistics of transporting results from around the country to the national nerve centre Abuja have slowed the process. Prof Akin Oyebode, an academic, noted that Nigeria lacks high-speed trains while flights are often delayed. “We have to remember we are a third-world country, not a first-world country,” he said.
Buhari, who ruled a military government in the mid-1980s, is making his fourth run at the presidency since 1999. His chances have been boosted by frustration over endemic corruption, criticism over Jonathan’s handling of Boko Haram’s six-year Islamist uprising and a well-organised opposition.Buhari, who ruled a military government in the mid-1980s, is making his fourth run at the presidency since 1999. His chances have been boosted by frustration over endemic corruption, criticism over Jonathan’s handling of Boko Haram’s six-year Islamist uprising and a well-organised opposition.
International observers gave broadly positive reactions to the conduct of the vote, despite late delivery of election materials and technical glitches with new voter ID card readers in some areas. Nigeria’s Transition Monitoring Group, which had observers across the country, said: “These issues did not systematically disadvantage any candidate or party.”International observers gave broadly positive reactions to the conduct of the vote, despite late delivery of election materials and technical glitches with new voter ID card readers in some areas. Nigeria’s Transition Monitoring Group, which had observers across the country, said: “These issues did not systematically disadvantage any candidate or party.”
But fears persisit that the election, thought to be the most expensive in African history, will be polarising and that the losing side will not accept the outcome. After Buhari lost to Jonathan in 2011, 800 people died and 65,000 were forced from their homes by riots in the north.But fears persisit that the election, thought to be the most expensive in African history, will be polarising and that the losing side will not accept the outcome. After Buhari lost to Jonathan in 2011, 800 people died and 65,000 were forced from their homes by riots in the north.