This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/03/technology/europe-regulators-apple-google-facebook.html

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
In Europe, Apple’s Music Streaming Service Is Scrutinized In Europe, Apple’s Music Streaming Service Is Scrutinized
(about 2 hours later)
LONDON — Apple’s plans to start a subscription music streaming service are coming under scrutiny by European antitrust regulators. LONDON — It is not a good week to be a giant American tech company in Europe.
Officials have sent questionnaires to several music labels and rival music streaming companies in recent weeks as they gather evidence to decide whether an official investigation is needed, according to several people with direct knowledge of the matter who spoke only on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. The European antitrust investigation into Google appears to be heating up. More European countries are looking into Facebook’s privacy settings.
The development was revealed as Europe’s five-year antitrust investigation against Google could soon be ramping up. The European Commission has asked several companies, like Yelp, that had filed complaints against the search giant to make their confidential submissions public, according to several people with direct knowledge of the matter who spoke only on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. By asking for the submissions public, the commission can ask Google to respond to the companies’ claims and bring the case closer to resolution. And Apple, which already is under scrutiny for its low corporate tax arrangements in Ireland, is now facing potential antitrust questions from the European Commission about the company’s new music streaming service expected this year.
Another United States-based tech giant, Facebook, was facing increased scrutiny on Thursday, when French, Italian and Spanish privacy officials said that they had opened investigations into whether its new policy had broken the region’s tough data protection rules. Facebook responded that it had complied. The new developments offer the latest and perhaps clearest sign yet that American tech giants face intensifying scrutiny in Europe — pressure that could potentially curb their sizable profits in the region and affect how they operate around the world.
In the music streaming case, the questions from competition officials at the European Commission have focused on the relationship between the labels and streaming services like Apple, Spotify of Sweden and Deezer of France, those people added. The commission has also asked for information related to the potential licensing terms between Apple and the music labels. It is unclear what exactly set off the recent flurry of moves. But many local lawmakers have long been wary of the dominance of American tech companies, and those politicians have become increasingly outspoken about how the companies have used their financial deep pockets and ability to innovate quickly to outmuscle European rivals.
The concerns focus on whether Apple, which is a crucial partner for the music industry worldwide, may try to persuade labels to favor its new streaming service over those of rivals like Spotify, according to one executive at a major label, who declined to speak publicly because of the delicacy of the situation. Apple is expected to unveil a new music streaming service this year. “It’s no wonder Europe is going after these companies,” said Luca Schiavoni, a regulatory analyst at the technology research company Ovum in London. “They are the biggest fish in the pond and have become very powerful. That inevitably means regulators are going to get involved.”
Unlike rival services that offer individuals the ability to stream music free, Apple’s offering is expected to charge all consumers. Europe’s antitrust officials want to ensure that Apple’s new service does not gain an unfair advantage over rivals that use a so-called freemium model, in which consumers can stream music for free or upgrade to a monthly subscription, the music executive added. Europe’s willingness to police tech companies’ activities contrasts with a relatively hands-off approach favored by United States authorities, which have so far refrained from widespread antitrust lawsuits and privacy investigations into how tech companies use people’s online data.
Apple’s expected business model has been welcomed by many music executives, who have complained that free streaming services do not provide an incentive for consumers to pay for content. In recent years, however, American tech companies have become the central target for Europe’s antitrust officials. Advocates say this approach is aimed at limiting the dominance of a small number of companies, though industry executives say Europe is using the investigations to promote the region’s own tech companies, which often have been unable to compete with their United States rivals.
An official investigation by the European Commission could lead to big fines against Apple and other restrictions on its activities if the company is found to have broken antitrust rules. On Thursday, Apple became the latest West Coast company to face this scrutiny after it was revealed that European competition officials had sent questionnaires to several music labels and rival music streaming companies, according to several people with direct knowledge of the interactions who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
News about the European Commission’s sending out questionnaires to people in the music industry was reported earlier by The New York Post. The questions are part of attempts by European authorities to gather evidence to decide whether an official antitrust investigation into Apple’s new music service will be needed, the people added. News of the questionnaires sent to music industry executives was earlier reported by The New York Post.
Representatives of Apple, the European Commission, Spotify, Deezer, Sony Music Entertainment and Warner Music Group all declined to comment. An official investigation by the European Commission, the executive arm of the European Union, could lead to big fines against Apple and other restrictions on its activities if the company is found to have broken antitrust rules. In a previous antitrust case, for example, Microsoft agreed to pay fines totaling $1.8 billion for breaking European competition rules.
Apple has faced similar scrutiny in the e-book market, where it was accused by United States regulators of colluding with publishers to inflate prices. Apple was eventually ordered to pay $400 million in damages, though the company is appealing. The most recent concerns focus on whether Apple, a crucial partner for the music industry, may try to persuade labels to favor its new paid streaming service over those of rivals like Spotify, which have free tiers, according to one executive at a major label, who declined to speak publicly.
Apple is working with engineers from Beats Electronics, a music streaming service and headphone maker that the company bought last year for $3 billion, on its new music streaming service. Apple is also expected to unveil an enhanced iTunes Radio service that could be tailored to regional markets. Europe’s antitrust officials want to ensure that Apple’s new subscription service does not gain an unfair advantage over rivals like Spotify, the music executive added.
Apple is playing catch-up in the music streaming business after the likes of Spotify have garnered tens of millions of paying subscribers. The iTunes service from Apple, which does not require a regular subscription, has almost one billion customer accounts. Representatives of Apple, the European Commission, Spotify and the major record companies all declined to comment.
Perhaps no company is in European regulators’ cross hairs more than Google, whose search engine holds roughly a 90 percent share of the region’s online search market.
As part of its five-year antitrust investigation into whether Google used its dominant position to favor its own services over rivals, the European Commission has now asked several companies that had filed complaints against the search giant to make their confidential submissions public, according to several people with direct knowledge of the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
By asking several of these companies to make their submissions public, the European Commission can ask Google to respond to the companies’ claims and bring the case closer to resolution, according to several of the people. News of the requests to companies to make their submissions public was earlier reported by The Wall Street Journal.
Officials and analysts warned, however, that it was still unclear whether the European Commission would file charges against Google.
Yet by pushing ahead with their investigation, Europe’s antitrust officials have gone beyond efforts by the Federal Trade Commission, which is under renewed scrutiny over how it handled its own competition investigation into Google. A recently released internal report by the agency suggested that some officials had recommended that Google should have been sued for antitrust practices, though the F.T.C. decided in 2013 not to bring charges.
If Google is found to have broken European antitrust rules, the financial penalties could be substantial. Officials have the power to fine Google up to 10 percent, or roughly $6.5 billion, of its most recent annual sales and to place restrictions on the company’s operations in Europe. A spokesman for Google declined to comment.
“Everyone is very aware that this case has to come to some sort of conclusion,” said Mario Mariniello, a researcher at the think tank Bruegel in Brussels and a former antitrust official. “The pressure is rising. They will have to come to some sort of decision soon.”
European lawmakers have also paid increasing attention to the tax activities of the likes of Apple, Facebook and Amazon, many of which have used complicated accounting structures to reduce their tax burdens across the region.
In the last 12 months, countries like France and Britain have criticized companies like Google for not paying enough tax on their operations in those countries.
And in a sign that European regulators’ interest in American tech companies has continued to expand despite industry efforts to appease local authorities, several European data protection regulators are now questioning how companies like Facebook and Google protect the online data of the region’s more than 500 million people.
Many of the region’s data protection watchdogs are reviewing whether Facebook’s new privacy policy, which went into effect from Jan. 1, broke the region’s tough privacy rules, which offer people greater control of how companies can use their data than is currently offered in the United States.
On Thursday, French, Italian and Spanish privacy officials said they had opened investigations into the social network’s privacy policies; similar inquiries have already been started by Dutch, Belgian and German officials.
The regulators are asking whether Facebook gained sufficient approval from users when the company gained access to their online data.
“We’re not afraid of scrutiny,” a Facebook representative said in a statement. “We have been responsive to local regulators and stand ready to respond to additional questions.”
The first hearing in a separate class-action lawsuit against Facebook took place less than a week ago in Austria, where roughly 25,000 claimants are arguing that the social network misused their online data. Facebook contends that it has complied with the region’s data protection rules.
“This is just the beginning of our investigation,” said Mathias Moulin, deputy director of enforcement at the French data protection regulator, who is overseeing the watchdog’s review of the company’s activities. “Facebook affects millions of people across Europe. There are a lot of privacy issues to look at.”