This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/london/7219097.stm

The article has changed 12 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
Win for disability rights woman Win for disability rights woman
(10 minutes later)
A woman who said she was forced to leave her job because of her disabled son has won the latest round in her discrimination case. A woman who said she was "harassed" into resigning from her job because she has a disabled son has won the latest round in her discrimination case.
A European Court of Justice judge agreed that Sharon Coleman suffered "discrimination by association".A European Court of Justice judge agreed that Sharon Coleman suffered "discrimination by association".
She claimed her former London employers Attridge Law described her as "lazy" for wanting time off to care for her son.She claimed her former London employers Attridge Law described her as "lazy" for wanting time off to care for her son.
Campaigners have said the case may help provide protection for other carers.Campaigners have said the case may help provide protection for other carers.
Ms Coleman said her manager had commented that her child was always sick, and had accused her of trying to use his condition to get out of work.
She said she was overjoyed the case - which had been heard by an appeal tribunal - was being heard by the European Court.
When they heard that my son Oliver had a serious illness, they didn't expect me to return to work Sharon Coleman
"I was upset and shocked at the attitude of my former employers. They knew about my son's problems because I took him into the office, but they wouldn't allow me to work flexibly to make it easier to look after him," she said.
"Other members of staff were taking time off for hospital appointments or worked from home but my requests were always turned down.
"When they heard that my son Oliver had a serious illness, they didn't expect me to return to work."
Since the UK instituted the Human Rights Act, few cases have been referred to Europe.
However, in this case the EU's Equal Treatment Directive's interpretation of disability discrimination is much wider than the UK's - in Europe, the person does not have to suffer from the disability themselves but could be the parent or spouse of a disabled person.
Carers UK chief executive Imelda Redmond said: "This case has profound implications for the one in five carers who give up work to care and face discrimination at work as a direct consequence of caring."