This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/apr/03/obama-republicans-iran-nuclear-deal
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Obama fights to contain Republican rebellion over Iran nuclear deal | Obama fights to contain Republican rebellion over Iran nuclear deal |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| The White House was desperately trying to contain a congressional revolt against its tentative nuclear deal with Iran on Friday, amid concern that hardliners in Washington could sink the agreement before it has even been finalized. | |
| Republicans and some Democrats are demanding a say over the framework agreement, which would drastically cut Tehran’s nuclear program in return for relief of sanctions that have crippled the Iranian economy. | |
| Barack Obama, who has called several key legislators over the last 24 hours to convince them of the merits of the deal outlined in Switzerland, insists it will cut off every pathway that Iran could take to a nuclear weapon, and avoids a military conflict. | Barack Obama, who has called several key legislators over the last 24 hours to convince them of the merits of the deal outlined in Switzerland, insists it will cut off every pathway that Iran could take to a nuclear weapon, and avoids a military conflict. |
| Yet the agreement, negotiated by the US and other world powers, is facing stiff opposition from Republicans on Capitol Hill – and received only a lukewarm reaction from Democrats. | Yet the agreement, negotiated by the US and other world powers, is facing stiff opposition from Republicans on Capitol Hill – and received only a lukewarm reaction from Democrats. |
| There are several bills in the House and Senate that could scupper the deal. | There are several bills in the House and Senate that could scupper the deal. |
| The most likely to receive broad bipartisan support – brought by the Republican chair of the Senate foreign relations committee, Bob Corker – would prevent sanctions relief for 60 days, providing Congress space to review the deal, which is due to be completed at the end of June. | The most likely to receive broad bipartisan support – brought by the Republican chair of the Senate foreign relations committee, Bob Corker – would prevent sanctions relief for 60 days, providing Congress space to review the deal, which is due to be completed at the end of June. |
| Corker said the bill will be put to a committee vote on 14 April, giving the Obama administration the two-week Easter recess to persuade Democrats not to support the legislation. Others in his party are demanding language that would effectively render the nuclear agreement a treaty requiring ratification by the Senate. | |
| Related: Angry Republicans condemn 'alarming' nuclear deal with Iran | Related: Angry Republicans condemn 'alarming' nuclear deal with Iran |
| The White House has said Obama would veto Corker’s bill, but aides to the president are increasingly alarmed at the prospect of the legislation receiving the two-thirds majority that overrides the presidential veto. Such a scenario would seriously endanger the final stages of the talks. | The White House has said Obama would veto Corker’s bill, but aides to the president are increasingly alarmed at the prospect of the legislation receiving the two-thirds majority that overrides the presidential veto. Such a scenario would seriously endanger the final stages of the talks. |
| Corker insists he has sufficient support from Democrats for a veto-proof majority. “If Congress kills this deal – not based on expert analysis, and without offering any reasonable alternative – then it’s the United States that will be blamed for the failure of diplomacy,” Obama said on Thursday. | Corker insists he has sufficient support from Democrats for a veto-proof majority. “If Congress kills this deal – not based on expert analysis, and without offering any reasonable alternative – then it’s the United States that will be blamed for the failure of diplomacy,” Obama said on Thursday. |
| He added: “Do you really think that this verifiable deal, if fully implemented, backed by the world’s major powers, is a worse option than the risk of another war in the Middle East?” | He added: “Do you really think that this verifiable deal, if fully implemented, backed by the world’s major powers, is a worse option than the risk of another war in the Middle East?” |
| His remarks were aimed at Democrats, rather than those Republicans who are working in partnership with Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu to scupper the deal. | His remarks were aimed at Democrats, rather than those Republicans who are working in partnership with Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu to scupper the deal. |
| Hawks in the US were quick to dismiss what they called a “list of concessions” to Iran; Republican senator Mark Kirk compared the agreement to Neville Chamberlain’s appeasement of Adolf Hitler. | Hawks in the US were quick to dismiss what they called a “list of concessions” to Iran; Republican senator Mark Kirk compared the agreement to Neville Chamberlain’s appeasement of Adolf Hitler. |
| More moderate Republicans, however, reacted cautiously, raising questions about the deal but insisting they would need to inspect the fine print that emerges in June. “It is important that we wait to see the specific details of today’s announcement,” said Corker, who is open to amending his bill to ensure it has the Democratic backing required to override a presidential veto. | More moderate Republicans, however, reacted cautiously, raising questions about the deal but insisting they would need to inspect the fine print that emerges in June. “It is important that we wait to see the specific details of today’s announcement,” said Corker, who is open to amending his bill to ensure it has the Democratic backing required to override a presidential veto. |
| Even some critics of the deal in Washington privately concede that the agreement was considerably more detailed, and tougher on Tehran, than they expected. | Even some critics of the deal in Washington privately concede that the agreement was considerably more detailed, and tougher on Tehran, than they expected. |
| The White House said it is not opposed to Congress providing oversight over the final settlement, but is vehemently opposed to legislation that would either empower the legislature to approve the deal or otherwise prevent officials from finalising the detail. | The White House said it is not opposed to Congress providing oversight over the final settlement, but is vehemently opposed to legislation that would either empower the legislature to approve the deal or otherwise prevent officials from finalising the detail. |
| “What would not be constructive is legislative action that essentially undercuts our ability to get the deal done and that is disruptive to the negotiations,” a senior official in the Obama administration said. “Do not do something that could derail the negotiations and leave the United States getting blamed for the collapse of talks.” | “What would not be constructive is legislative action that essentially undercuts our ability to get the deal done and that is disruptive to the negotiations,” a senior official in the Obama administration said. “Do not do something that could derail the negotiations and leave the United States getting blamed for the collapse of talks.” |
| The Obama administration has worked on two fronts during 18 months of talks. The president made the talks a key priority for his top diplomat, secretary of state John Kerry, in the hope of achieving a defining, and much-needed, foreign policy legacy. | The Obama administration has worked on two fronts during 18 months of talks. The president made the talks a key priority for his top diplomat, secretary of state John Kerry, in the hope of achieving a defining, and much-needed, foreign policy legacy. |
| Back in Washington, administration officials have been doing back room deals and strong-arming wavering Democrats. The White House has defused repeated threats of legislation it believed could weaken its hand or sabotage negotiations. | Back in Washington, administration officials have been doing back room deals and strong-arming wavering Democrats. The White House has defused repeated threats of legislation it believed could weaken its hand or sabotage negotiations. |
| But the White House’s lack of leverage in Congress has long been Obama’s achilles heel, and lawmakers from both parties now argue they should have a say in the alleviation of sanctions that were imposed by the legislature in the first place. | But the White House’s lack of leverage in Congress has long been Obama’s achilles heel, and lawmakers from both parties now argue they should have a say in the alleviation of sanctions that were imposed by the legislature in the first place. |
| Democrat Tim Kaine, a member of the Senate foreign relations committee, welcomed the agreement as “a positive step”, but reiterated his support for Corker’s bill, which he said allowed Congress to “weigh in on any final deal”. | Democrat Tim Kaine, a member of the Senate foreign relations committee, welcomed the agreement as “a positive step”, but reiterated his support for Corker’s bill, which he said allowed Congress to “weigh in on any final deal”. |
| Obama’s efforts to dissuade sceptics in his own party from undermining the agreement were dealt an unexpected boost on Thursday, when Bob Menendez, a Democratic hawk and a thorn in the administration’s side on Iran, was criminally indicted. Menendez was forced to step down from his position as the ranking Democratic member member of the foreign relations committee after corruption charges were filed on Thursday, hours before the deal was unveiled. | |
| His replacement, senator Ben Cardin, has said only that Congress “has a role to play” in reviewing the final nuclear agreement, and is expected to demand that Corker’s legislation is watered down in exchange for Democratic support. | His replacement, senator Ben Cardin, has said only that Congress “has a role to play” in reviewing the final nuclear agreement, and is expected to demand that Corker’s legislation is watered down in exchange for Democratic support. |