This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/apr/05/prescott-defends-prince-charles-black-spider-memos-government-ministers

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Lord Prescott defends Prince Charles over 'black spider' memos Lord Prescott defends Prince Charles over 'black spider' memos
(about 9 hours later)
Lord Prescott has gone public for the first time about letters he received while in government from Prince Charles, defending the future monarch’s right to “write as many damn letters as he likes”.Lord Prescott has gone public for the first time about letters he received while in government from Prince Charles, defending the future monarch’s right to “write as many damn letters as he likes”.
The former deputy prime minister, 76, said he cannot see a problem with Charles writing to government ministers, adding that the prince has “a lot to offer this country”. Prescott made the remarks in his Sunday Mirror column. The former deputy prime minister, 76, said he could not see a problem with Charles writing to government ministers, adding that the prince has “a lot to offer this country”. Prescott made the remarks in his Sunday Mirror column.
Last month the supreme court upheld a ruling which paved the way for the publication of the so-called “black spider” memos – which the Guardian has pursued under the Freedom of Information Act. These memos were written between September 2004 and March 2005 and sent by Prince Charles to seven government departments. Last month the supreme court upheld a ruling which paved the way for the publication of the so-called black spider memos, which the Guardian has pursued under the Freedom of Information Act. The letters were written between September 2004 and March 2005 and sent by the prince to seven government departments.
In 2012, the then attorney general, Dominic Grieve, said the correspondence contained Charles’s “most deeply held personal views and beliefs”, adding the disclosure might undermine the prince’s “position of political neutrality”, which he might not easily be able to recover when king. In 2012, the then attorney general, Dominic Grieve, said the correspondence contained Charles’s “most deeply held personal views and beliefs”, and argued the disclosure might undermine the prince’s “position of political neutrality”, which he might not easily be able to recover when king.
However, the judges concluded that Grieve did not have the legal power to veto a freedom of information tribunal, which had decided the memos should be published. The supreme court judges, however, concluded that Grieve did not have the legal power to veto a freedom of information tribunal, which had decided the memos should be published.
Prescott, whose letters are separate to the 27 letters due to be released, says that while he is “not a raving loyalist”, he has “a lot of time for Charles” who is to be the next king and would be “wrong to ignore.” Prescott, whose letters are separate to the 27 due to be released, said that while he was “not a raving loyalist”, he had “a lot of time for Charles” who is to be the next king and would be “wrong to ignore”.
He added the letters “show he has nothing to hide and he shouldn’t be worried about publication”. The letters “show he has nothing to hide and he shouldn’t be worried about publication”, he added.
Prescott revealed that as deputy prime minister responsible for transport and the environment, he regularly received letters from the prince and “didn’t mind receiving them”.Prescott revealed that as deputy prime minister responsible for transport and the environment, he regularly received letters from the prince and “didn’t mind receiving them”.
The first letter the Labour peer revealed was a typed invitation to a meeting of Regional Development Agency leaders in 1999 in which Charles said it would be “splendid” to see Prescott.The first letter the Labour peer revealed was a typed invitation to a meeting of Regional Development Agency leaders in 1999 in which Charles said it would be “splendid” to see Prescott.
The second in 2003 expressed sadness at the death of Prescott’s mother.The second in 2003 expressed sadness at the death of Prescott’s mother.
Prescott said that while he listens to the views of everyone who contacts him on political matters, he makes his own decisions.Prescott said that while he listens to the views of everyone who contacts him on political matters, he makes his own decisions.
“Charles has an awful lot to offer this country,” he writes, “And if he wants to serve his subjects by helping young people into work, combating climate change and building sustainable communities, he can write as many damn letters as he likes.” “Charles has an awful lot to offer this country,” he wrote in his column. “And if he wants to serve his subjects by helping young people into work, combating climate change and building sustainable communities, he can write as many damn letters as he likes.”
The prince has long been accused of “bombarding” ministers with memos attacking government policy. His letters are named after his distinctive spidery handwriting. The prince has long been accused of bombarding ministers with memos attacking government policy. His letters are named after his distinctive spidery handwriting.
For a decade there have been attempts by Whitehall to block the release of the memos. Whitehall has attempted to block the release of the memos for a decade, and both Clarence House and the prime minister expressed disappointment after the court ruling.
Both Clarence House and the prime minister expressed disappointment after the court ruling.