This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/rand-paul-filibuster-presidential-hopeful-calls-for-end-of-nsa-surveillance-in-11-hour-speech-10265807.html

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Rand Paul filibuster: Presidential hopeful calls for end of NSA surveillance in 11-hour speech Rand Paul filibuster: Presidential hopeful calls for end of NSA surveillance in 11-hour speech
(35 minutes later)
Republican Presidential hopeful Rand Paul has called for the end of the Patriot Act in a marathon 11-hour filibuster on the Senate floor.Republican Presidential hopeful Rand Paul has called for the end of the Patriot Act in a marathon 11-hour filibuster on the Senate floor.
From just after 1pm till nearly midnight, the Kentucky Senator launched a scathing critique of US government surveillance on the American people, during which he invoked exiled NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden.From just after 1pm till nearly midnight, the Kentucky Senator launched a scathing critique of US government surveillance on the American people, during which he invoked exiled NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden.
"There comes a time in the history of nations when fear and complacency allow power to accumulate and liberty and privacy to suffer," he began."There comes a time in the history of nations when fear and complacency allow power to accumulate and liberty and privacy to suffer," he began.
NSA illegal spying and data collection of innocent Americans must end. Thank you all for standing with me. #StandwithRandNSA illegal spying and data collection of innocent Americans must end. Thank you all for standing with me. #StandwithRand
Decked out in comfortable running shoes, Paul voiced his opposition to key sections of the Patriot Act, a controversial surveillance law passed in the aftermath of 9/11 and due to expire on 1 June.Decked out in comfortable running shoes, Paul voiced his opposition to key sections of the Patriot Act, a controversial surveillance law passed in the aftermath of 9/11 and due to expire on 1 June.
Paul, in his second major filibuster in two years, was backed by a handful Senators from both sides of the aisle who helped lighten the load.Paul, in his second major filibuster in two years, was backed by a handful Senators from both sides of the aisle who helped lighten the load.
After about two and half hours, Democrat Ron Wyden - another staunch opponent of surveillance - stood up and the Senators asked eachother questions. This happened several times throughout the filibuster, but crucially Paul did not yield the floor — which meant no other topic could be discussed.After about two and half hours, Democrat Ron Wyden - another staunch opponent of surveillance - stood up and the Senators asked eachother questions. This happened several times throughout the filibuster, but crucially Paul did not yield the floor — which meant no other topic could be discussed.
In opposing the reauthorisation of the surveillance law, which allows the government to collect Americans' phone data, though not the content of the calls, Paul sets himself apart from most of the rest of the Republican Presidential pack, who largely support extensive intelligence operations.In opposing the reauthorisation of the surveillance law, which allows the government to collect Americans' phone data, though not the content of the calls, Paul sets himself apart from most of the rest of the Republican Presidential pack, who largely support extensive intelligence operations.
He is also challenging the authority of Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell, the Senate's other Kentucky representative.He is also challenging the authority of Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell, the Senate's other Kentucky representative.
 
The traditional talking filibuster, which is rarely used anymore, is designed to delay a vote on specific legislation. The traditional talking filibuster, which is rarely used anymore, is designed to delay a vote on specific legislation. 
For this reason, some commentators have claimed that Paul's speech wasn't really a filibuster as such. His protest delayed a vote a trade deal instead of the Patriot Act, which will won't be voted on until the beginning of June — but it may have complicated Senator McConnell's legislative plans.For this reason, some commentators have claimed that Paul's speech wasn't really a filibuster as such. His protest delayed a vote a trade deal instead of the Patriot Act, which will won't be voted on until the beginning of June — but it may have complicated Senator McConnell's legislative plans.
The Republican-controlled House of Representatives has voted to end bulk collection of phone data but to allow surveillance on a case-by-case basis if a special court approves; President Barack Obama supports this measure. Paul, however, says it doesn't go far enough.The Republican-controlled House of Representatives has voted to end bulk collection of phone data but to allow surveillance on a case-by-case basis if a special court approves; President Barack Obama supports this measure. Paul, however, says it doesn't go far enough.
Too accurate right now. #StandWithRand @RandPaul pic.twitter.com/ib5OzrW4J2Too accurate right now. #StandWithRand @RandPaul pic.twitter.com/ib5OzrW4J2
 
Though the topic is evidently something Paul, son of libertarian cult-hero Ron Paul, cares about, it was clear that this filibuster was conceived to kickstart his run for President. In fact, he didn't even hide it — his social media accounts used the opportunity to appeal for campaign donations.Though the topic is evidently something Paul, son of libertarian cult-hero Ron Paul, cares about, it was clear that this filibuster was conceived to kickstart his run for President. In fact, he didn't even hide it — his social media accounts used the opportunity to appeal for campaign donations.
There was much activity under the hashtag #StandWithRand, which first emerged in March 2013 when Paul spent 13 filibustering CIA head John Brennan's nomination to talk about drone policy and has since been used Paul's political slogan.There was much activity under the hashtag #StandWithRand, which first emerged in March 2013 when Paul spent 13 filibustering CIA head John Brennan's nomination to talk about drone policy and has since been used Paul's political slogan.