This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/01/man-accused-killing-son-scaffolding-pole-custody-dispute
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Man accused of killing son with scaffolding pole over custody dispute | Man accused of killing son with scaffolding pole over custody dispute |
(35 minutes later) | |
A man killed his adopted son by hitting him over the head with a scaffolding pole then made a bungled attempt to dispose of the body in the river Thames, a court has heard. | A man killed his adopted son by hitting him over the head with a scaffolding pole then made a bungled attempt to dispose of the body in the river Thames, a court has heard. |
Colin McSweeny, a retired firefighter, is on trial at the Old Bailey accused of murdering Shaun McSweeny at the family home in Thornton Heath, south London, on 20 November last year. He denies murder. | Colin McSweeny, a retired firefighter, is on trial at the Old Bailey accused of murdering Shaun McSweeny at the family home in Thornton Heath, south London, on 20 November last year. He denies murder. |
McSweeny, 59, was caught by police after he was spotted in the early hours of the morning trying – and failing – to drop the body into the Thames at Deptford Wharf while the “tide was against him”, the court was told. | McSweeny, 59, was caught by police after he was spotted in the early hours of the morning trying – and failing – to drop the body into the Thames at Deptford Wharf while the “tide was against him”, the court was told. |
He allegedly killed Shaun because Shaun was preparing to move out with his girlfriend – and to take his five-year-old daughter with him – setting the family on a “terrible collision course” over the child. | |
Until then she had been living with her grandparents, McSweeny and his wife, Gloria, who had hoped to gain permanent custody of their granddaughter as they had become too attached to give her up, and did not consider their son a suitable parent, the court was told. | |
Opening the case, Crispin Aylett QC, prosecuting, told jurors the murder was “as deliberate as it was desperate”. | Opening the case, Crispin Aylett QC, prosecuting, told jurors the murder was “as deliberate as it was desperate”. |
On the night of his death, Shaun, 24, bought a kebab after work and sat in his van eating it outside the home where he lived with his parents. The defendant allegedly lured him into the garage and repeatedly hit him over the head from behind with a scaffolding pole, fracturing his skull. | |
The court was told that when police searched the garage, they found the weapon wrapped in cling film as well as a tarpaulin which had been laid on the floor. After killing Shaun, McSweeny moved his son’s work van from outside the house to about half a mile away so a police officer friend, who was due to visit, did not spot it, the court heard. | |
PC Sarah Lavington had gone to the house with flowers and chocolates to celebrate Mrs McSweeny’s 60th birthday a couple of days earlier. Aylett said: “What followed can only really be described as surreal: while Shaun’s body lay in the defendant’s garage, he and his wife entertained a police officer in their living room.” | |
McSweeny made the visitor a cup of tea and he and his wife sat chatting and told her amusing anecdotes for a couple of hours, the court heard. When Lavington prepared to leave at 11.15pm, Mrs McSweeny said she had no idea where Shaun was and that he would probably come home drunk and “tread mud all the way up the stairs”. | |
Aylett said: “The defendant, of course, would have known only too well where Shaun was. Now he had to get his body out of his garage.” Shaun’s van was driven from its temporary hiding place to about a mile and a half away from the house, the court heard. | Aylett said: “The defendant, of course, would have known only too well where Shaun was. Now he had to get his body out of his garage.” Shaun’s van was driven from its temporary hiding place to about a mile and a half away from the house, the court heard. |
Some time after 2.30am, a man in a flat overlooking Deptford Wharf saw a large black car pulling up. The witness said a white-haired man got out and opened and shut the boot before driving off, and shortly afterwards he returned and dragged what looked like a body by the ankles. | Some time after 2.30am, a man in a flat overlooking Deptford Wharf saw a large black car pulling up. The witness said a white-haired man got out and opened and shut the boot before driving off, and shortly afterwards he returned and dragged what looked like a body by the ankles. |
The man was said to have returned to the car to retrieve a piece of tarpaulin and went back to where he apparently left the body and dragged it to the wall alongside the waterfront. | The man was said to have returned to the car to retrieve a piece of tarpaulin and went back to where he apparently left the body and dragged it to the wall alongside the waterfront. |
The witness said when the man tried to lift the object over the wall, it was clear it was a body, and he called police just before 3am to report it. Before he got off the phone, the driver had dragged the body back to the car and driven off. | The witness said when the man tried to lift the object over the wall, it was clear it was a body, and he called police just before 3am to report it. Before he got off the phone, the driver had dragged the body back to the car and driven off. |
Aylett said: “It would seem that the tide must have been against the defendant.” | Aylett said: “It would seem that the tide must have been against the defendant.” |
On the way to the scene, Insp Simon James saw a black 4x4 vehicle going in the opposite direction and went in pursuit. After the car was stopped by police in Evelyn Street, Deptford, the defendant was asked by an officer if he knew why he had been stopped. | |
He replied: “Yes.” | He replied: “Yes.” |
He was then asked: “What have you got in the car?” | He was then asked: “What have you got in the car?” |
He replied: “A body.” | He replied: “A body.” |
Officers uncovered Shaun’s body lying on a heavily bloodstained tarpaulin in the boot. | Officers uncovered Shaun’s body lying on a heavily bloodstained tarpaulin in the boot. |
When asked if anyone else had come to harm, McSweeny said: “No, there’s only one body you have to worry about.” | When asked if anyone else had come to harm, McSweeny said: “No, there’s only one body you have to worry about.” |
A search of Deptford Wharf uncovered blood traces on the wall, a piece of tarpaulin, one of Shaun’s shoes and a trail of coins and buttons along the route where his body had been dragged, the court heard. | A search of Deptford Wharf uncovered blood traces on the wall, a piece of tarpaulin, one of Shaun’s shoes and a trail of coins and buttons along the route where his body had been dragged, the court heard. |
Aylett told jurors the defendant would say he acted in self-defence after being pushed by Shaun in the garage where he had gone to pick up some golf clubs. But the lawyer said: “Instead, the prosecution allege that the defendant killed his son deliberately. It may have been hastily conceived and ill-thought-through but it was, nonetheless, done deliberately. | Aylett told jurors the defendant would say he acted in self-defence after being pushed by Shaun in the garage where he had gone to pick up some golf clubs. But the lawyer said: “Instead, the prosecution allege that the defendant killed his son deliberately. It may have been hastily conceived and ill-thought-through but it was, nonetheless, done deliberately. |
“Having murdered his son, the defendant intended to dispose of his body in such a way as might mean that it was never found or if it was, that Shaun’s death could not be linked to him. In the event, of course, getting rid of the body turned out to be rather more difficult than he had imagined and the plan quickly unravelled.” | “Having murdered his son, the defendant intended to dispose of his body in such a way as might mean that it was never found or if it was, that Shaun’s death could not be linked to him. In the event, of course, getting rid of the body turned out to be rather more difficult than he had imagined and the plan quickly unravelled.” |
McSweeny denies murdering Shaun, who worked for a windscreen repair company. The trial was adjourned for the day. |
Previous version
1
Next version