This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/suffolk/7244545.stm

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Multiple killer theory on murders Multiple killer theory on murders
(20 minutes later)
More than one person might have been involved in the killing of five women in Suffolk, a jury was told.More than one person might have been involved in the killing of five women in Suffolk, a jury was told.
Prosecutor Peter Wright QC said police could not rule out the theory "another or others" may have played a part.Prosecutor Peter Wright QC said police could not rule out the theory "another or others" may have played a part.
Tania Nicol, 19, Annette Nicholls, 29, Paula Clennell, 24, Gemma Adams, 25 and Anneli Alderton, 24, were all found dead around Ipswich in December 2006. But the counsel said the defendant "simply could not restrain himself" and "needed more than sex".
At Ipswich Crown Court, Steve Wright, 49, denied killing the women, who all worked as prostitutes. Steve Wright, 49, denies the murder of Tania Nicol, Paula Clennell, Anneli Alderton, Annette Nicholls and Gemma Adams, who all worked as prostitutes.
The prosecutor said one particular individual - supermarket worker Tom Stephens - could not be eliminated. The naked bodies of the five women were all found in and around Ipswich over a 10-day period in December 2006.
The admissions were made as the prosecutor was making his closing speech at forklift truck driver Steve Wright's trial.
Mere suspicions in respect of Tom Stephens cannot be converted into evidence Peter Wright QCMere suspicions in respect of Tom Stephens cannot be converted into evidence Peter Wright QC
The admissions were made as the prosecutor was making his closing speech at forklift truck driver Steve Wright's trial.
The prosecutor said one particular individual - supermarket worker Tom Stephens - could not be eliminated, but that suspicions did not equate to evidence.
"Was more than one person involved?" Mr Wright said."Was more than one person involved?" Mr Wright said.
"We say the answer is simple. We may never know. No-one saw the crimes being committed. "We say the answer is simple. We may never know. No one saw the crimes being committed.
"The offences may be the work of one man but we cannot exclude the possibility that another or others may have had a hand in each of these deaths.""The offences may be the work of one man but we cannot exclude the possibility that another or others may have had a hand in each of these deaths."
'Common denominator''Common denominator'
He said the defence team had "raised the spectre of Tom Stephens" who was arrested on suspicion of murder and released without charge.He said the defence team had "raised the spectre of Tom Stephens" who was arrested on suspicion of murder and released without charge.
"There is no evidence that provides him with an independent verifiable alibi that would conclusively rule him out," the counsel said."There is no evidence that provides him with an independent verifiable alibi that would conclusively rule him out," the counsel said.
Steve Wright, 49, denies killing the five women
"Mere suspicions in respect of Tom Stephens cannot be converted into evidence.""Mere suspicions in respect of Tom Stephens cannot be converted into evidence."
Steve Wright was the one "common denominator" in the case, he added. Steve Wright was the one "common denominator" in the case, he said.
Jurors have been told the defendant's DNA was found on three of the women's bodies and forensic evidence from his clothes, home or car links him to all five.Jurors have been told the defendant's DNA was found on three of the women's bodies and forensic evidence from his clothes, home or car links him to all five.
"The reality is Steve Wright simply could not restrain himself," said Mr Wright.
"He embarked on a course of conduct that deprived these women of their lives.
"Sex with them was not sufficient. He needed more and he achieved it at their expense," he added.
The trial continues.The trial continues.