This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/24/world/middleeast/irans-supreme-leader-stiffens-his-position-on-nuclear-talks.html

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Iran’s Supreme Leader Stiffens His Position on Nuclear Talks Iran’s Supreme Leader Seems to Step Back From Nuclear Talks
(about 4 hours later)
TEHRAN — Iran’s supreme leader appeared to stiffen his hard line Tuesday on concessions in any nuclear agreement with foreign powers, one week before the deadline for completing an accord. TEHRAN — With exactly a week left before the deadline for a final agreement to limit Iran’s nuclear program, the country’s supreme leader appeared to undercut several of the central agreements his negotiators have already reached with the West.
In a speech broadcast live on Iranian state television, the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said he would not abide any freeze on Iran’s sensitive nuclear work for long periods, ruled out foreign inspections of Iranian military sites and demanded that all sanctions imposed on Iran be lifted with immediate effect once an accord is signed. In a speech broadcast live on Iran state television, the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, demanded that most sanctions be lifted before Tehran has dismantled part of its nuclear infrastructure and before international inspectors verify that the country is beginning to meet its commitments. He also ruled out any freeze on Iran’s sensitive nuclear enrichment for as long as a decade, as a preliminary understanding announced in April stipulates, and he repeated his refusal to allow inspections of Iranian military sites.
The ayatollah, who has the final word on nuclear matters, has repeatedly said he supports the negotiations. But his public statements have become increasingly unyielding as the talks between Iran and six major powers, including the United States, head toward a June 30 deadline. His remarks on Tuesday appeared to be the strongest yet. American officials said they would not be baited into a public debate with the ayatollah, who has the final word on nuclear matters. But with Western foreign ministers already hinting that the negotiations may go past the June 30 deadline, both American and European officials have said in recent weeks they are increasingly concerned about the possible effects of the Ayatollah’s statements.
“All economic, financial and banking sanctions, implemented either by the United Nations Security Council, the United States Congress or the administration must be lifted immediately when the deal is signed,” Mr. Khamenei said according to his personal website, khamenei.ir. Only after such a move, will Iran start implementing its commitments, he said. “Rest of the sanctions must be lifted in rational intervals.” Even if the remarks were made chiefly to mollify hard-liners and military leaders, they say, they could sharply limit the flexibility of Iran’s chief negotiator, Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, as he heads into the week when the most difficult concessions are likely on both sides.
Iran does not accept the “strange formula” for removing the sanctions suggested by the United States in earlier negotiating sessions, Mr. Khamenei said, adding that “removing the sanctions must not be dependent on implementing Iran’s commitments.” It is possible, outside experts say, that the ayatollah’s series of statements over the past two months, seemingly stepping back from major commitments made by Mr. Zarif’s team, are carefully choreographed to bolster Iran’s negotiators, who can argue that they cannot deviate from the supreme leader’s strictures.
The Supreme Leader also said that verification of Iran’s commitments by the International Atomic Energy Agency is out of the question. “My best judgment is that this is about leverage,” Cliff Kupchan, the chairman of Eurasia Group, a political risk research and consulting firm in Washington, said in a telephone interview. “This is the last time to get the best possible deal. I think what he’s shooting for is the most sanctions relief he can get as soon as he can get it, and the least intrusive inspection regime going forward.”
“We have said from the first place that we want cruel sanctions be lifted,” Mr. Khamenei said. “You cannot ask us to fulfill our commitments and wait for the I.A.E.A.’s confirmation for removing the sanctions. We completely disagree with it.” Almost as interesting as what Ayatollah Khamenei said is what he omitted. He said nothing about lifting the United Nations arms embargo on Iran, which the United States is resisting. Nor did he rule out inspections under the International Atomic Energy Agency’s “additional protocol,” a set of inspection standards that more than 100 other nations allow — and that permit some inspections on military sites. But he did object to “unconventional inspections, interrogating certain Iranian individuals and inspecting military sites.”
Mr. Khamenei also vowed to maintain an active nuclear program, which he says is for peaceful purposes. “Freezing Iran’s research and development for a long time like 10 years or 12 years is not acceptable,” he said. Iran has distrusted the nuclear watchdog agency since five of its nuclear scientists were blown up or shot on the streets of Tehran, a series of assassinations the Iranians accuse the United States and Israel of organizing.
By contrast, in the State Department’s “fact sheet” about the preliminary agreements struck in Lausanne, Switzerland, in late March and early April, the United States summarized the agreement on inspections this way: “Iran will be required to grant access to the I.A.E.A. to investigate suspicious sites or allegations of a covert enrichment facility, conversion facility, centrifuge production facility, or yellowcake production facility anywhere in the country.”
The ayatollah has repeatedly mixed his unyielding statements with assurances that he supports the negotiations, and tributes to the patriotism of the negotiators. But his remarks on Tuesday were his strongest yet, and came just two or three days before Secretary of State John Kerry and other foreign leaders are supposed to convene in Vienna.
One of his statements, for example, suggested that a central premise of the deal — that sanctions would be lifted only in close coordination with Iran’s dismantlement of centrifuges and reduction of its stocks of low-enriched uranium — is not possible.
“All economic, financial and banking sanctions, implemented either by the United Nations Security Council, the United States Congress or the administration, must be lifted immediately when the deal is signed,” the ayatollah said, according to his personal website, Khamenei.ir.
Only after that has happened will Iran start abiding by its commitments, he said. “The rest of the sanctions must be lifted in rational intervals,” he said.
Much may depend on what the ayatollah means by the word “signed.” It is possible that Iran will reach an understanding with the United States, Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia, but not “sign” the agreement for months. That would give Iran time to come into compliance with the terms, allowing President Obama to “lift” oil and financial sanctions on the first day of the accord. But the ayatollah seemed to rule out any linkage between Iran’s actions and the lifting of sanctions.
Tehran, he said, does not accept the “strange formula” for removing the sanctions, adding that “removing the sanctions must not be dependent on implementing Iran’s commitments.”
The ayatollah also said that verification of Iran’s actions by the International Atomic Energy Agency was out of the question.
“We have said from the first place that we want cruel sanctions to be lifted,” Ayatollah Khamenei said. “You cannot ask us to fulfill our commitments and wait for the I.A.E.A.’s confirmation for removing the sanctions. We completely disagree with it.”
The ayatollah also vowed to maintain an active nuclear program, which he says is for peaceful purposes. “Freezing Iran’s research and development for a long time, like 10 years or 12 years, is not acceptable,” he said.
Under the preliminary agreements described in April by the United States, some research work would be permitted, but Iran could not operate new, advanced centrifuges for more than a decade.