This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/supreme-court-upholds-obamacare-subsidies-in-major-victory-for-white-house-and-millions-of-americans-10345539.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Supreme Court upholds Obamacare subsidies in major victory for White House and millions of Americans President celebrates as Obamacare reforms survive Supreme Court challenge and he wins special powers to pursue Asia-Pacific trade deal
(about 4 hours later)
The health insurance programme that is at the heart of the Obama presidency survived another potentially fatal challenge on Thursday as the United States Supreme Court ruled against plaintiffs who said it was illegally extending subsidies to millions of lower-income Americans. President Barack Obama is savouring critical victories on two fronts as the Supreme Court turned away a potentially crippling challenge to his signature healthcare reforms and he prepared to sign a new law giving him special powers to pursue a new free trade pact with countries in Asia and the Pacific.
The ruling by the nine US Justices was a major victory for President Barack Obama. Had the court fallen the other way, as many as 6.4 million people across 34 states might have had tax subsidies enabling to buy insurance coverage taken from them.  The White House had been bracing for catastrophe if the nine justices on the top court had tipped the other way and agreed with plaintiffs in the case that tax subsidies paid to millions of lower-income Americans under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, to buy insurance coverage were illegal.
Passed after a long struggle in Congress in 2010, Obamacare, which is designed drastically to reduce the numbers without health coverage, might have quickly unraveled thereafter. The 6-3 ruling, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, could mark the moment when Obamacare, driven through a divided US Congress in 2010, finally becomes more or less entrenched. It will dismay those on the right, including Republicans seeking the White House, who want it dismantled. In 2012, Justice Roberts also voted with the majority to reject an earlier challenge that also threatened to torpedo the law.
“The Affordable Care Act is here to stay,” a vindicated President Obama declared shortly after the decision was issued. Noting the serial attempts of foes to extinguish or fatally wound it in the courts and the roughly 50 times that Republicans in Congress had tried to repeal it, he went on: “For all the repeal attempts, this law is now helping millions of Americans.”
“This is a good day for America,” the president said. After the five-year passage of Obamacare through Congress this was the day when “we finally declared that healthcare is not a privilege for a few but a right for all,” he said.
Obama and Vice President Joe Biden react after a heckler was removed for their extended interruption (Reuters)Obama and Vice President Joe Biden react after a heckler was removed for their extended interruption (Reuters)
Chief Justice John Roberts was joined by fellow conservative Justice Anthony Kennedy and the court's liberal members in the majority. On trade, Mr Obama has also been living dangerously. The law giving him so-called fast track authority to conclude a wide-ranging Asia-Pacific free trade pact was sent to his desk late on Wednesday by the US Senate but only after weeks of nail-biting drama on Capitol Hill when it was very nearly killed by a revolt in the ranks of his own party. Without the authority, which means the US Congress has the right to reject or approve new trade deals but not amend then, his entire free trade agenda would have been upended.
The decision means the subsidies will remain not just in the 13 states that have set up their own exchanges and the three states that have state-federal hybrid exchanges, but also in the 34 states that use the exchange run by the federal government. Yet the road ahead for concluding the deal with 11 other countries, including Canada, Australia, Vietnam and Chile, will not be easy. The agreement’s fate and the free trade debate in general, which galvanises opponents on the left and in particular the union movement, is sure to reverberate through next year’s presidential race.
The case centered on the tax subsidies offered under the law, passed by Mr Obama's fellow Democrats in Congress in 2010 over unified Republican opposition, that help low- and moderate-income people buy private health insurance. The exchanges are online marketplaces that allow consumers to shop among competing insurance plans. The plaintiffs in the Obamacare case had seized on murky wording in the original law that could have been seen to imply that subsidies could be paid only to those buying insurance on marketplaces, or exchanges, set up by individual states but not by the federal government. With 34 states using the federal marketplace only, about 6.4 million Americans risked losing those subsidies.
Reuters said the question before the justices was whether a four-word phrase in the expansive law saying subsidies are available to those buying insurance on exchanges "established by the state" has been correctly interpreted by the administration to allow subsidies to be available nationwide As Mr Obama spoke in the White House Rose Garden, so Republicans issued regrets. “I am disappointed by today’s ruling,” Jeb Bush said, promising that as president he would “repeal and replace this flawed law with conservative reforms that empower consumers with more choices and control over their healthcare decisions”.
Roberts wrote that although the conservative challengers' arguments about the plain meaning of the statute were "strong," the "context and structure of the act compel us to depart from what would otherwise be the most natural reading of the pertinent statutory phrase".  Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas Governor, tweeted:  “#ObamaCare ruling is judicial tyranny”.
Yet while Republicans on Capitol Hill might have celebrated the Supreme Court disabling Obamacare it would also have forced them to find ways to compensate the millions suddenly faced with losing their insurance policies.
That would have been a tangle they are happy to be avoiding – although the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Republican John Boehner, suggested the issue was not settled in his eyes. He called Obamacare “fundamentally broken” and that the “struggle” against it would go on.