This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jul/13/former-ukip-mep-ashley-mote-sentenced-five-years-prison-expenses-fraud
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Former Ukip MEP sentenced to five years in prison for expenses fraud | Former Ukip MEP sentenced to five years in prison for expenses fraud |
(about 1 hour later) | |
A former Ukip MEP who cheated almost £500,000 in European parliament expenses has been jailed for five years. | A former Ukip MEP who cheated almost £500,000 in European parliament expenses has been jailed for five years. |
Ashley Mote, 79, submitted bogus claims for his parliamentary allowance, which was supposed to be for work that organisations had carried out on his behalf. He used the money to fund court battles in the UK after he was prosecuted for a previous benefits fraud. | |
The politician dishonestly obtained about €355,000 and £184,000 of allowances to which he was not entitled. | The politician dishonestly obtained about €355,000 and £184,000 of allowances to which he was not entitled. |
Mote, of Binsted, Hampshire, was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment at Southwark crown court on Monday. | Mote, of Binsted, Hampshire, was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment at Southwark crown court on Monday. |
Justice Stuart Smith said Mote had lied, protested, lied and lied again during his trial. | Justice Stuart Smith said Mote had lied, protested, lied and lied again during his trial. |
He said: “Your greed and dishonesty were matched only by your hypocrisy because while this was going on you carried out a high-profile campaign condemning corruption and the improper use of public money in the very institution from which you were leeching it.” | |
“You knew perfectly well what the rules were for the claiming of expenses and you also knew perfectly well that what you were doing had nothing to do with funding whistleblowers and everything to do with funding your bridging loan, your mortgage, your legal expenses that were unrelated to your role as an MEP. | |
“You abused your position of trust as an elected representative and you abused the trust that the European parliament placed in you, consistently making false statements in the knowledge that the institutions trusted their MEPs to be reliable and honest. | “You abused your position of trust as an elected representative and you abused the trust that the European parliament placed in you, consistently making false statements in the knowledge that the institutions trusted their MEPs to be reliable and honest. |
“Along the way you deceived people who shared your declared political ideals and even considered you to be something of a political hero. You are, as was said by the trial judge when you were convicted of substantial benefits fraud in 2007, a thoroughly dishonest man. The consistency of your dishonesty is breathtaking.” | |
The judge added: “As you came towards the end of your time as an MEP you decided to milk what you saw as your cash cow to the limit.” | The judge added: “As you came towards the end of your time as an MEP you decided to milk what you saw as your cash cow to the limit.” |
Mote was convicted at trial of four counts of obtaining a money transfer by deception, three of false accounting, two of fraud, and one each of acquiring criminal property, concealing criminal property and theft. The offences took place between November 2004 and July 2010. | Mote was convicted at trial of four counts of obtaining a money transfer by deception, three of false accounting, two of fraud, and one each of acquiring criminal property, concealing criminal property and theft. The offences took place between November 2004 and July 2010. |
Mote was allowed to sit in the back of court because of hearing problems. | Mote was allowed to sit in the back of court because of hearing problems. |
Previous version
1
Next version